

The government was wrong in trying to encourage the arts..Singaporeans are not ready for it and I am not surprised that they should lose money. The government has allowed themselves to be persuaded by the arty farty types that the investment will pay off. I doubt it...Originally posted by FireIce:we may have the infrastructure for world class arts but the ppl's mindset towards appreciating and involving in arts is not there......
in our yrs of education, how much of the syllabus is for music, dance, drama, painting, design and such?
are there enuf channels for ppl to reach out to the arts?
and will arts guarantee u a rice bowl?
i would say, in recent yrs, the govt did put in effort....
like setting up SOTA and demarcating a "Arts District"
but bear in mind u wun see results over night
it will take many yrs and perhaps a few generations to fully have artists of our own, nurtured from young.....
also the ppl will have to learn tt arts is not something tts oni for the rich and ppl who have too much time......
i wun say the sum of money is not justifiable.....
i see the efforts....but it's the ppl tt are not reacting or giving the desired results......
when was the last time u watched a performance at esplanade?
That's precisiously why government is trying to encourage arts: singaporeans are not ready for it, and if nothing is done about it, there would not be any art left in us, so to speak.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:The government was wrong in trying to encourage the arts..Singaporeans are not ready for it and I am not surprised that they should lose money. The government has allowed themselves to be persuaded by the arty farty types that the investment will pay off. I doubt it...
I agree with bringing in Broadway musicals but classical music and ballet do not have mass appeal. The Arts will not bring in much revenue in Asia outside of Japan. Rather waste money on this, the government should invest in science and technology.
I thought Arts is really something for the rich and the people who indeed have spare time.Originally posted by FireIce:we may have the infrastructure for world class arts but the ppl's mindset towards appreciating and involving in arts is not there......
in our yrs of education, how much of the syllabus is for music, dance, drama, painting, design and such?
are there enuf channels for ppl to reach out to the arts?
and will arts guarantee u a rice bowl?
i would say, in recent yrs, the govt did put in effort....
like setting up SOTA and demarcating a "Arts District"
but bear in mind u wun see results over night
it will take many yrs and perhaps a few generations to fully have artists of our own, nurtured from young.....
also the ppl will have to learn tt arts is not something tts oni for the rich and ppl who have too much time......
i wun say the sum of money is not justifiable.....
i see the efforts....but it's the ppl tt are not reacting or giving the desired results......
when was the last time u watched a performance at esplanade?
If you have money, you can talk about the arts and the finer things in life. When there are Singaporeans who are struggling to survive, the government's priority should be to generate wealth for the population. Popular art forms like broadway musicals may bring in revenue and they should be encouraged. We should not bother with more obscure forms of art that are financially non-viable.Originally posted by airgrinder:That's precisiously why government is trying to encourage arts: singaporeans are not ready for it, and if nothing is done about it, there would not be any art left in us, so to speak.
have you wondered why countires like italy, japan, maldives are rich in their arts and culture? because it is nutured from young. We singaporeans care about making money, surviving, and one day, this appreciation for arts may be completely lost. To be a country in itself, it's more than making money and surving. What's a life only about making money and surviving but without appreciation about the finner things?
Esplanade may not bring in monetary profits that can be broadcast proudly on their balance sheets, but the investments in its people can never be measured in dollars and cents.
The other easy way with immediate effect is......promote local RA moives Artistes. I would bet, it will definitely works.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:If you have money, you can talk about the arts and the finer things in life. When there are Singaporeans who are struggling to survive, the government's priority should be to generate wealth for the population. Popular art forms like broadway musicals may bring in revenue and they should be encouraged. We should not bother with more obscure forms of art that are financially non-viable.
As you will realize from the forumners here, if the Esplanade does not bring in money Singaporeans will consider it a white elephant. I think the building is beautiful and a spectacular landmark. But instead of Aida or Mozart, we should be hosting rock concerts, Aaron Kuok and whoever is the most popular idol of the time. Then I am sure we will see the investment bearing fruit.
The only form of arts that is worthwhile is the form that earns revenue.
Yes, Arts is good ,but the real issue is why we should waste $ like this,to build these 2 LPs,we spent at least S$500millions at one go and S$27 million a yr on maitenance,it is worthwhile!!!!Originally posted by the Bear:i got a question...
if the gabrament wasn't throwing money at the Arts, would you people be here ranting that the gabrament is not doing anything for the Arts?
serious question here...
that's a falsehood.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:I thought Arts is really something for the rich and the people who indeed have spare time.