Please do not compare with CEO, it should be compare with politic. Those who wish to make big money shouldn't be involve in paliament. In paliament you represent the people and you speak for the people not for self profits.Originally posted by NotFromVenus:Actually their pay is considered peanuts compared to the CEOs of companies that failed to perform and stepped down with Golden Parachutes.
They are building their own Diamond Parachute.![]()
Right!!!Originally posted by (human):Please do not compare with CEO, it should be compare with politic. Those who wish to make big money shouldn't be involve in paliament. In paliament you represent the people and you speak for the people not for self profits.
Originally posted by Dounut:I don't understand this:
If Durai's $600 Thousand salary package is not acceptable in the "Charity" Sector, why is our minister salary package of $1 Million +++ acceptable as a "Civil" Sector ? ?![]()
![]()
Isn't it outrightous ? ?![]()
Originally posted by NotFromVenus:Actually their pay is considered peanuts compared to the CEOs of companies that failed to perform and stepped down with Golden Parachutes.
They are building their own Diamond Parachute.![]()
No.Originally posted by shade343:At the end of the day, we have to ask ourselves this. Are we better off than we were 5 years ago? If we are, it means the government has done a good job.
Then ask these insatiable monsters to apply for jobs in other corporations...NOT IN GLC, TOMASICK OR GIC!!!!Originally posted by OO_OO_OO:the worse bull is when thy say what they earn is simply reflective of what they would earn in the private sector.
Well the difference is what you earn in the pivate sector, you earn it yourself. what you earn in the civil service is PAID BY THE PEOPLE.
if they cant accept that fact, then bloody step down.
i want passionate politicians to serve the country, not calculative fools who will only serve if they can get the same outrageous pay.
5 yrs ago, i maybe still able to find things to defend them against the taxi drivers....Originally posted by shade343:At the end of the day, we have to ask ourselves this. Are we better off than we were 5 years ago? If we are, it means the government has done a good job.
you just waked up?Originally posted by (human):Look at thier sky high pay, even US president is not thier match. What kind of big deeds have they done to receive such a huge amount? Don't the excuse given by LKY sound very absurb? Those who shamelessly accept the pay are not worthy to represent Singapore or fit to be in the paliament. Those who seek power are not worthy of that power.
I suggest to put the word bride with inverted commas "bride"!!!Originally posted by Mid9Sun:I strongly suggest the Mod change the title of the thread....or else....
U mean BRIBE?Originally posted by foomwee88:I suggest to put the word bride with inverted commas "bride"!!!
Caus MIW accepts "legalised" bride ,if not,done but dont get caught same as wat army taught us!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()