what choice r u ranting about, if u r in a 'walk over' constituency, shouldn't u have the rights to vote if that candidate has been doing a good job?Originally posted by the Bear:i didn't... i made this decision myself...
strange that in Singapore, where people rant and rage about "having a choice", and when someone makes a choice which is not theirs, they will condemn the person
i choose NOT to have a person who is a clown representing my ward.. i choose NOT to have a person who doesn't have a clue being part of the parliament... i choose NOT to vote for an incumbent who has done nothing and said nothing for years and years and turns up only during the elections...
so, it is a third path i choose...
just because i choose to reject the idiots in power, doesn't mean i have to support another lot of idiots...
i guess you are no different from the people in power... your way is the only way and everyone else and every other way is not acceptable...
do think about this
i did...
have you?
nicely put..Originally posted by 798:no matter wat, some idiot will STILL won the seat. the third path which u choose is not much different for letting pap to win. how do u justify a person to be clown then? any link? from 149th media?
if everyone think the same way as u do, the next election will be total dominant for the ruling parties.
i rather have a bunch of idiots who think of the people's interest and oppose the ruling party who only think of increasing taxes and make life difficult for us.
i have every respect for the oppositions as they are the minority who are against a bunch of bullies and thinking of pple interest. they are being prejudiced as outcast and some of them were out of job because their employers were scared of offending the government. they are definitely not the clowns or incubent.
ur enemy' enemies may not be ur best friends but they will definitely help to stop ur enemy from preceeding according to his own autocratic way.
like that they divine liao ar.??Originally posted by googoomuck:Aiya, SinGAPORE has to world's first mah.
Where on earth can one find another country with 3 PMs in the government, like the father, son and the holy goh?
ai yo, lor soh le....Originally posted by (human):The son need to give his father a title in order to consult and get advised? Does this mean that President BUSH need to give his father a position in government so that he can get consult from him?
You are not dumbOriginally posted by Mitsubishi hater:ai yo, lor soh le....
got title then got big big pay mah!
Basically he made the choice that he felt would best benefit himself and his constituency on the short run. Can't say he's in the wrong.. not everyone is keep to overthrow the PAP-ites, especially the ones who are currently benefitting from their rule...Originally posted by eyebuzz:what choice r u ranting about, if u r in a 'walk over' constituency, shouldn't u have the rights to vote if that candidate has been doing a good job?
Marlow says, "The mind of man is capable of anything - because everything is in it!"Originally posted by spinsugar:Basically he made the choice that he felt would best benefit himself and his constituency on the short run. Can't say he's in the wrong.. not everyone is keep to overthrow the PAP-ites, especially the ones who are currently benefitting from their rule...![]()



Why not?Originally posted by LazerLordz:The third way may be a moral choice, but it cannot be translated into a realistic outcome.
Those who can see are not blind followers.Originally posted by mistyblue:you guys still think there is a chance to vote?
How about those who can see, but no choice because if they don't follow they don't get anything at all in the future (ie HDB upgrading)Originally posted by (human):Those who can see are not blind followers.
You did not get the point.Originally posted by (human):Those who can see are not blind followers.
No one knows what will happen tomorrow.Originally posted by mistyblue:You did not get the point.