IF, our knowledgeable government had forseen these circumstances long ago, these issues could have been successfully avoided. Fact is, they DID NOT.Originally posted by thinkloud2004:Jakarta cut off sand supply to us. KL wants to limit or terminate water flow to us. Our two close neighbours, when they cannot compete with us on other economic terms, resort to "bankrupt" us with what they have and we have not. I am sure our Govenment have had forsee this long ago. We simply cannot depend on desperate competitors who are trying hard to be level with us.
2.ur comments are not fair.PAP have prepared it well and soundOriginally posted by ShutterBug:IF, our knowledgeable government had forseen these circumstances long ago, these issues could have been successfully avoided. Fact is, they DID NOT.
........
.




You are just making a fool out of yourself for making these sort of statement.Originally posted by ShutterBug:IF, our knowledgeable government had forseen these circumstances long ago, these issues could have been successfully avoided. Fact is, they DID NOT.
Doing things their way, having things done their way, being strictly by-the-book in negotiations, and being inflexible as well as insensitive, brought them these denial of services and supplies today!!
What do youthink?? They forsaw all these??? They were thinking that they can strong-arm our neighbors!!!
Too bad, doesn't work on others - only on meek and suppressed Singaporeans.
I have no eyes to see liao...
2.u mean SG can control the weather and use RSAF ''towOriginally posted by :Fret not! Haven't you noticed that Jarkarta & many parts of Malaysia have been submerged in water..........? I control the weather and turn it against them mah - aka retribution.!![]()
In all fairness Shutterbug, the SG govt has been finding means through the decades to resolve the water issue by damming up the reservoirs as well as developing cheaper desalination methods. The closing of Malaysian taps is not unforeseeable cos of the very obvious reliance on them for water. If Malaysia wants to play hardball and strong-arm us, surely you wouldn't want the govt to go meek and be suppressed?Originally posted by ShutterBug:IF, our knowledgeable government had forseen these circumstances long ago, these issues could have been successfully avoided. Fact is, they DID NOT.
Doing things their way, having things done their way, being strictly by-the-book in negotiations, and being inflexible as well as insensitive, brought them these denial of services and supplies today!!
What do youthink?? They forsaw all these??? They were thinking that they can strong-arm our neighbors!!!
Too bad, doesn't work on others - only on meek and suppressed Singaporeans.
I have no eyes to see liao...
If this was not planned for, I am sure Singapore would have been taken as hostage with any possible new supply from overseas, plus how can the first shipment of sand arrive singapore so soon if this wasnt planned ahead.Originally posted by zaxis:Indonesia Cut off Sand
but not Papua New Guinea.
We still have fresh delivery 400,000 metric ton from there.
and that should be better, now even Cambodians would like to deliver Sand to singapore
You must know that they are facing difficulties now, the flood around the region has affected thier decision to supply us. Imagine if your country can't provide for your own people will you go and supply others?Originally posted by thinkloud2004:Jakarta cut off sand supply to us. KL wants to limit or terminate water flow to us. Our two close neighbours, when they cannot compete with us on other economic terms, resort to "bankrupt" us with what they have and we have not. I am sure our Govenment have had forsee this long ago. We simply cannot depend on desperate competitors who are trying hard to be level with us.
Originally posted by a-Lost-9uY:let it be la..
we SG always kana bully by them de..
i believe our govt sure got some countersteps against their moves
2.How safe is MY pig?Pl read--Originally posted by zaxis:Still remember the case of Pork from Malaysia?
how can Malaysia pork problem, solved over night?
how long they need before new pork can breed from Indonesia?
how till now cannot import from Malaysia?
Veterinary Services Department (VSD) director-general Datuk Abdul Aziz Jamaludin says pig farmers who dishonour the "Aku Janji" oath will be brought to court.---http://www.thesundaily.com/article.cfm?id=16704
"There's no need for new laws to prosecute errant pig farmers. If they feed pigs with beta-agonist, a banned growth enhancer, the court will decide on the penalty under the Penal Code," he added.
Abdul Aziz said state governments can also use their state enactment to punish the culprits, including closing down their farms.
He said VSD enforcement teams are still conducting checks and collecting samplings on pig farms in the country. "If they are found using beta-agonist, the farms will be quarantined."
"Farms found free from the use of beta-agonist, we will continue to conduct tests. We will not tell them that they are clear," he added.
Deputy Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister Datuk Mah Siew Keong said it was now mandatory for pig farmers to sign the "Aku Janji" oath for renewal of farming licence.
"This will enable us to take legal action when they break the oath," said Mah.
Meanwhile, Federation of Livestock Farmers' Associations of Malaysia pig unit chairman Tung Hong Chai said: "We support the government's oath signing requirement for pig farming licence.
"Although most pig farmers had agreed to sign the oath, they were advised to seek legal advice from their lawyers.
"If pig farmers have stopped using the growth enhancer, there is no harm in signing the oath," he said.
Tung said the VSD should reconduct tests on pig farms, found using beta-agonist and quarantined for a month, again so the farmers can resume their operations and business.
However, an industry source said the many loopholes in the various Acts governing the use of the growth enhancer had been exploited and "is now the source of problems" as the control of drugs in animals is under the jurisdiction of the Health Ministry.
The loopholes in the Poison Act:
* beta-agonist has been classified as Group A poison for animal feed since 1991, but no action has been done to ensure it is not used;
* the Act allows drugs to be sold to farmers directly and they do not need to seek any veterinary advice from veterinarians or prescription;
* no requirement for pharmacists to declare what is in the product when they sell it to the customers. Most packages can even have no labels or can be sold in plastic pails, bags or drums with minimal labelling; and
* the Act also allows complete exemption on import and sale without restriction of all veterinary feeding supplements, which means if an importer falsely declares the growth enhancer as importing veterinary feeding supplements - there is no need for him to have a poison licence.
He said although the Sale of Drugs Act accepts the registration of veterinary medicines, to date there is no veterinary drug registered.
He said any drug in any label, without the quality check or control in any way can be imported if it is declared as veterinary drug.
He said the VSD through its primary legislation, the Animal Act, has no authority on producers on the use of drugs.
"Why is the Health Ministry pushing the problem to the Agriculture Ministry as the Act has no authority on producers on the use of drugs," he added.
He said the VSD provided veterinary inspections at government and privatised abattoirs but once the meat leaves the abattoirs, "it falls under the jurisdiction of the Health Ministry's Food Act".
He said it was ironic that the (health) minister now wants to identify the root causes of the problems afflicting pig farmers when the puzzling problems had been looming since 1991 when beta-agonist was banned.
SDP calls on the PAP to identify itself on the Internet and challenges it to an online debateOriginally posted by JLennon:In all fairness Shutterbug, the SG govt has been finding means through the decades to resolve the water issue by damming up the reservoirs as well as developing cheaper desalination methods. The closing of Malaysian taps is not unforeseeable cos of the very obvious reliance on them for water. If Malaysia wants to play hardball and strong-arm us, surely you wouldn't want the govt to go meek and be suppressed?
As for the sand issue, to what extent that itself was foreseeable remains unknown. In fact, anyone can always look back on hindsight to say that anything that has occured could have been foreseeable.
I doubt strong-arming was an agenda when dealing with our ASEAN neighbours. SG is not a superpower and cannot do that. As far as SG is concerned, it is standing up for its sovereign status and will not subject itself and its citizens to any form of blackmail by our neighbours.
In all the posts I have seen from you, I do not recall seeing you credit the govt for any good that they have done for SG. I might have missed it though....
2.i appeal to SDP also do the same.Originally posted by ShutterBug:SDP calls on the PAP to identify itself on the Internet and challenges it to an online debate
05 Feb 07
>>> http://www.singaporedemocrat.org/articlepapinternet.html
Originally posted by :Fret not! Haven't you noticed that Jarkarta & many parts of Malaysia have been submerged in water..........? I control the weather and turn it against them mah - aka retribution.!![]()