Termination of train services is bullcrap. Works can be carried out at night to solve that problem. If we can close major roads for roadworks, i dont see why we cant do the same for our rail system.All maintain work start 0100hr and must end by 0430hrs....... 4.5hrs to check, repair, clean the rail for the whole 90+KM of route.......
Feedback your suggestion to SMRT. See what happens.Originally posted by hloc:No..... those A*shole who 'share' their music on their loudspeaker really really PISSES me off...... the $$$ will be put to good use..... like saving some other A*shole who can't take care of themselve and don't understand ''NOT to step over the yellow line''.......
Panels like that prevent access to the track. Simple.Originally posted by CKeer:Ok, let me first start by asking you what kind of glass panel are u referring to? Glass panels like those of underground stations or those build a feet apart from one another, leaving space for the door opening?
Either of those requires lots and lots of money. On top of that, who will guarantee that glass panel would stop accidents like those from happening?
Carried out at night? How many train stations are there in Singapore? Those that are not underground. You'll need lots of manpower and on top of that, the equipments.
Why do incidents like those that happened recently doesn't appear like, 10 years ago?
I've taken train during peak hours and i've a place to stand that is far away from the yellow line. Those that squeezed in front are the kiasu ones, waiting to seize the opportunity to grab a seat. The smarter ones would have stepped back.
Think harder.
Cheers.
C.K
Yes indeed, you have quite a point there; why weren't there any incidences in the early 80s?? Maybe, people were well making a good living and then life was more precious??? Unlike now, where a lot of people are living hand-to-mouth and then some are basically crawling along and can barely put food on their tables?Originally posted by pwnz0r:All I can say it is odd that the MRT has been in service since the 80's and these incidents have only occured in more recent times. Perhaps the solution is beyond these barrier panels and the onus should be passenger's own caution.
However, it is a ridiculous notion that the cost of barrier panels to be borne by the passengers. In every year the SMRT makes a profit, do they redistribute this surplus back to passengers? A company, much less a GLC should be not guaranteed a profit year-on-year. It is ridiculous to put the consumers in a position to guarantee profits for these GLCs. Any cost, especially that towards safety, should be borne wholly and soley by SMRT.
They already made substanial retained earnings over the years. That should more than cover the cost of the panels.
How much time does an SMRT/SBS Transit team has to carry out maintainence works?Originally posted by OO_OO_OO:Maintenace isnt a good reason. If we can afford all the luxuries now, is it so difficult to clean a simple glass pannel?
Termination of train services is bullcrap. Works can be carried out at night to solve that problem. If we can close major roads for roadworks, i dont see why we cant do the same for our rail system.
And if you've taken a train before, you'll know that there is close to no standing room during peak hours. One doesnt need to be sick for an accident to happen.
try harder![]()
I would beg to differ.Originally posted by ShutterBug:Yes indeed, you have quite a point there; why weren't there any incidences in the early 80s?? Maybe, people were well making a good living and then life was more precious??? Unlike now, where a lot of people are living hand-to-mouth and then some are basically crawling along and can barely put food on their tables?
Could it be so??? And if so... WHY???
Yes indeed, you have quite a point there; why weren't there any incidences in the early 80s?? Maybe, people were well making a good living and then life was more precious??? Unlike now, where a lot of people are living hand-to-mouth and then some are basically crawling along and can barely put food on their tables?The reason no ''death'' was reported in the 80s is there was a clamp down on news about SMRT death..... 1st death happen in Bishan in the late 80s. Woman walk into the tunnel..... kept quite because the govt or SMRT scare more copycat....... therefore, the press were told not to put such death on the main page...... nowadays, with handphones and internet..... you can't 'cover' such matters anymore..... thats why it seems like alot of ppl are dying.
Could it be so??? And if so... WHY???
Maybe, people were well making a good living and then life was more precious???I don't remember my family ''making good living'' in the 80s. We just make do. Perhars not big screen TV, no big house, no cars loan or credit cards.... means less stress. Having food ont the table and a 20'' TV is good enough when I'm a kid.....
SMRT like all Company & Bosses...... don't want to listen to employee. We are paid to work..... not tell them what to do. The only suggestion they want, is how to make more $$$$ for the share holder...... employee are not consider 'Human' anyway......Originally posted by iveco:Feedback your suggestion to SMRT. See what happens.
there are no news reported does not mean it did not happenOriginally posted by pwnz0r:All I can say it is odd that the MRT has been in service since the 80's and these incidents have only occured in more recent times. Perhaps the solution is beyond these barrier panels and the onus should be passenger's own caution.
However, it is a ridiculous notion that the cost of barrier panels to be borne by the passengers. In every year the SMRT makes a profit, do they redistribute this surplus back to passengers? A company, much less a GLC should be not guaranteed a profit year-on-year. It is ridiculous to put the consumers in a position to guarantee profits for these GLCs. Any cost, especially that towards safety, should be borne wholly and soley by SMRT.
They already made substanial retained earnings over the years. That should more than cover the cost of the panels.
It actual will..... less stopage, means more passager per train load. Not need to have buses ready to bring passager to & from affected Station..... bus drivers are paid OT....... no need to repay passager of their tickets.... etc.Originally posted by mistyblue:Will stopping people from committing sucide increase SMRT Profit?
Answer this and you will know what will be SMRT reply.