You still need someone among them who's familiar with what the safety requirements for an F1-spec track are.Originally posted by IIOOII:Hi Kuali Baba, the reason why i didn't include professionals from within F1 initially is to do away with "that's impossible" syndrome. Then the proposal by the other group of professionals will at least have some possibility. For normal cases, even if the final result is just 10% of the orinignal from the creative group, it will be very spectacular.
Originally posted by hloc:pardon me, am i missing out something here...are u also implying tt the gahmen here is also `cheap and good' since they adopt that line of thinking? practice what they preach?
But 1st...... Govt must overcome the [b]"CHEAP & GOOD'' thinking...![]()
[/b]
Originally posted by IIOOII:Definitely, as we are talking about 1 ton projectiles travelling as speed of excess 300kmh, thus safety is priority one. But they have to come in later as you cannot expect a safety officer to be very creative, their job is to make people stick by the rule, else people will die.
Let the creative people propose then see what can be pass thru safety, take what is left of the best, then the result should be ok. Must let the correct people do the correct job in the correct sequence.
The Eiffel tower was first built to be a monument for an exhibition, then they use it for telegraphy antenna, then for radio antenna and then for TV broadcasting. Now it is a landmark that preciously guarded by French.
HAHAHA..... no lah..... When they do anything, the thing must be "Cheap & Good".... but when come to their pay.... what do you think.... hahahahaOriginally posted by weiqimun:pardon me, am i missing out something here...are u also implying tt the gahmen here is also `cheap and good' since they adopt that line of thinking? practice what they preach?