ST caught lying again?
-
From Sammyboy....
Our Straits Times.....
The Wall Street Journal
Bloomberg
** Seperately, TNP polled 200 people above 20 and the majority said it was the right time to raise minister's pay. -
the number 6% is correct...
whether you want to call it robust (it is when 'benchmarked' against others) or slowed (it is when compared to last year) it is still 6%.. what you have to look at is the spin doctors at work...
and i think the TNP interviewed 200 of the Grassroots bootlickers
-
66.6% is Strong Mandate.
So 6% is Robust Growth -
All these false positive news splash in our local papers are as artificially flavored as the gov's Instant Noodle solutions and policies...
What do you expect???
The truth??
I think that's what they don't want us to know - the TRUTHS! -
so, the PM's husband is 66.6%Originally posted by mistyblue:66.6% is Strong Mandate.
So 6% is Robust Growth -
Our PM is a guy. Wouldn't his husband make him gay?Originally posted by the Bear:so, the PM's husband is 66.6% -
Overseas articles reported that majority feel it's not right to raise ministers' salaries, right here, we have the majority who feel it's right.
-
look at his spouse.. no way can that be a woman.. in fact.. if that was a man, he'd be an UGLY man
hell! even lau lee said it himself! "my son didn't marry for looks"
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Our PM is a guy. Wouldn't his husband make him gay? -
who's going to be shi ming de and hold a protest?
-
tamgo .. ST dont want to be sue by saying the truth .. .. and sometime news report are inaccurate ..
-
obviously right??...u cant see them coming out n say, ya i know majority felt not right but i still wanna increase right.??Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Overseas articles reported that majority feel it's not right to raise ministers, right here, we have the majority who feel it's right. -
He also didn't marry any brains either .... what is the old man so proud of.Originally posted by the Bear:look at his spouse.. no way can that be a woman.. in fact.. if that was a man, he'd be an UGLY man
hell! even lau lee said it himself! "my son didn't marry for looks"
look at temasek and that stupid purchase.
unlike the king whose touch turns everything to gold, hers made everything dust and ashes. -
Is there anybody who would write to ST Forum, and see what happens?
Probably would be ignored.. but no harm trying?Originally posted by ^tamago^:From Sammyboy....
Our Straits Times.....
The Wall Street Journal
Bloomberg
** Seperately, TNP polled 200 people above 20 and the majority said it was the right time to raise minister's pay. -
Actually, ST is quite clever. The 6% is correct as Bear says, it's the way they phrase it. Have to read in between lines...Originally posted by furideriku:tamgo .. ST dont want to be sue by saying the truth .. .. and sometime news report are inaccurate .. -
I don't think he married some brainy human either. Look at what she's done.Originally posted by the Bear:look at his spouse.. no way can that be a woman.. in fact.. if that was a man, he'd be an UGLY man
hell! even lau lee said it himself! "my son didn't marry for looks" -
Hi 5. I wrote that also. Look above.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:I don't think he married some brainy human either. Look at what she's done. -
His son did marry for looks ! His first wife was attractive but she went to her grave too soon.Originally posted by the Bear:look at his spouse.. no way can that be a woman.. in fact.. if that was a man, he'd be an UGLY man
hell! even lau lee said it himself! "my son didn't marry for looks"
Better die young and stay pretty. His son didn't deserve a good looking woman for a wife.
His second wife is average looking in picture. she looks scarier in person. -
No wonder Senior Lee said his son didn't marry for the looks.Originally posted by googoomuck:His son did marry for looks ! His first wife was attractive but she went to her grave too soon.
Better die young and stay pretty. His son didn't deserve a good looking woman for a wife.
His second wife is average looking in picture. she looks scarier in person. -
lol lol .. who really read in between the lines .. i just wonder the benefit of raising the gst also read in between the line ???Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Actually, ST is quite clever. The 6% is correct as Bear says, it's the way they phrase it. Have to read in between lines... -
That's the problem, most don't.Originally posted by furideriku:lol lol .. who really read in between the lines .. i just wonder the benefit of raising the gst also read in between the line ???
Look at the Bloomberg headline and compare it with the Wall Street Journal headline. After Bloomberg got sued by LKY, they are more careful now.
Wall Street Journal headline is very direct, whereas Bloomberg's not. Now read the ST headline, you will understand why.
GST increase... if what they say is true, increase to help the poor... -
It's just like increasing GST.
You can say it increased 40% from 5% to 7%.
Or you can say that 7% is still lower than other countries' 15% GST. -
The majority of MPs, you mean?Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Overseas articles reported that majority feel it's not right to raise ministers' salaries, right here, we have the majority who feel it's right. -
When you have all the international publications speaking the same tune, notice that the old man would not seem to touch them because the damage that they can cause to Singapore's reputation as a economic hub and open financial center is great should they decide to boycott us as a market.
But then again, when it's one magazine at a time, look at AWSJ and you will know what I mean .