Malaysia's Big Weapons Armament Purchase
-
Try bombing all viable landing spots, you will run out of rockets before your spotters can even call out the damage. What makes you think our vipers have no shelters as well? Tengah is not as open as you think... ORBATs are, at best, for public showcase only. Everyone who thinks hard enough will know that every country has its little secrets...
-
Do your maths-18 x MLRS =4 ss90 each vehicle x 120 bomblets each rounds=8460 bomblets within a few seconds.
-
wah....he can count?? I thought he still need diapers. Aiya....mabbe he is really ex-service person, but is clean toilet one lor.Originally posted by HARIMAU:Do your maths-18 x MLRS =4 ss90 each vehicle x 120 bomblets each rounds=8460 bomblets within a few seconds. -
Yup, but only 18 launch vehicles. Can you ensue saturation of ALL viable military targets in that few seconds, even in a island 40km by 25km?Originally posted by HARIMAU:Do your maths-18 x MLRS =4 ss90 each vehicle x 120 bomblets each rounds=8460 bomblets within a few seconds.
I thnik with that kind of calculations you've proven your credibility and knowledge of military matters, which is exactly none. Try taking this calculations to other military forums, you'll be laughed off the site...
-
hello....hamirau..........u sure.....spore will let those northers wack our runway......blah blah............relax.......i ensure u.......Spore....will always let out our first punch .. ....ur mlrs......howitzer.......wat..g5 shit..........ha.........can cry the hell out of this surface of the earth........18 mlrs..to protect two large territory and u are still boasting.....ha...pls lah........be realistic......we will ensure u that u wiil fight two front..........we will not give up........we may not survive.....but we will make ur life a living hell.......trust mi...........
got guts to boast ur SAMs ha ha ...........u think so great ar.....pls lah....our F-16 are bulit with a self defence suit.......ur hornets leh.......have ......buy wholesale.....fly wholesale leh...........alot more to say lah.....mi no patience to say one by one......u haolian so much.........also lao lan........experts are reviewing Spore as the strongest armed force in SEA........so.......the more u boast in sgforum....the more stupid u are going to make...........y not boast at malayforums........i dare not go sia...........u and go and attract a audience............by the way back to the mlrs thing.......relax....singapore will not allow....u to wack all valuables ......that is at surface......so come on think wat is present underground........advance C4I facilities.......intelligence HQ.......weapon dump ....aircraft packing.........lets think of wat we dun know.........tok cock mlrs....pls lah....got guts hor.......fire now lah.........oh.....must train ur men very hard leh......if they miss...and killed a American GI hor......they will make u sure hor......they will not accidently but in purpose kill thousands of ur side u know.......so good day off training.....i wish u all the best hor........ -
Wah foxtrout... i was trying so hard not to lose my composure and there you are posting that... i salute you man!
-
actually hor...no need agrue one.......he come here want to pick a fight.......alemak...and we have to entertain him meh......sigh....we argue how hard......he still say he correct one
-
Too bad most of you guys still cannot take life seriously...no wait a minute my mistakes....you're sings.
-
Aiya...lose your composure over a person of such quality?...not worth it lar...bad for health.Originally posted by EXCO:Wah foxtrout... i was trying so hard not to lose my composure and there you are posting that... i salute you man!
He's only making a fool of himself. All can see he does not know his ABC in military stuff and operations. 10 yrs in military and this kind of quality?.....*gosh*...I think we can cut down my ICT liao...haaa -
So we singaporeans don't take life seriously yet we are generally doing better then malaysians. Wow!Originally posted by HARIMAU:Too bad most of you guys still cannot take life seriously...no wait a minute my mistakes....you're sings.
BTW MAF use artillery to bombard Singapore, SAF can also use artillery to bombard Malaysia. -
ya lor we so stupid.. leave all our vipers for you to shoot with MLRS.Originally posted by HARIMAU:Do your maths-18 x MLRS =4 ss90 each vehicle x 120 bomblets each rounds=8460 bomblets within a few seconds. -
Why don't you go and ask the Iraqi soldier how the their full of crap artiliary and MLRS worked against the Coalition forces?Originally posted by HARIMAU:
Surely you guys know little about weapons systems-Keris MLRS comes with a fire control radar truck,command and control vehicle,weather forecast vehicle etc.It is not a stand alone weapons systems.Accuracy is legendary-ask any Iranian soldiers who got blasted by the Iraqi MLRS. -
Wow!!!!!i didnt sings has got a piece of the supergun which could fire up to 200-400km-amazing
actually we dont really need the mlrs -all we have to do is to throw frag grenade across the causeway-surely hit something
country that small want to 'action'-even SAF were developed based on the malay regiment traditions-....what was the SAF moto again??was it in mandarin,english or malay???? -
I don't like to go into a flaming war, but to set things right for some ignorant zealots from Malaysia, do you know that in an all out arty war, Singapore has more 155mm tubes than Malaysia, more 52 calibre ones which can fire at a much higher rate than the FH-70. The only comparable gun in Malaysia army would be the South African G5/6, which you have got a pitful number. Do you even start thinking of an arty exchange because once push comes to shove, JB would be flatten within hours. Of course Singapore will suffer too but we will survive.Originally posted by HARIMAU:Wow!!!!!i didnt sings has got a piece of the supergun which could fire up to 200-400km-amazing
actually we dont really need the mlrs -all we have to do is to throw frag grenade across the causeway-surely hit something
country that small want to 'action'-even SAF were developed based on the malay regiment traditions-....what was the SAF moto again??was it in mandarin,english or malay????
Stop daydreaming about how good your armed forces really are. They are not bad but they are NOT as good as Singapore's and that is a fact. We are not trying to start an armed race or prepare to take on Malaysia or anyone else in the world. Being such small land mass, we need to have "the sting of a scorpion" and be able to commit deadly force whenever necessary to ensure our survival. -
In a Chinese saying, "qin chuan yu lan, sheng yu lan" which literally means that the disciple will outshine the master. Who cares if the SAF were developed based on the Malay regiment tradition (although I thought that we were based on the Israelis concept but I may be wrong) because in the actual war these do not count.Originally posted by HARIMAU:Wow!!!!!i didnt sings has got a piece of the supergun which could fire up to 200-400km-amazing
actually we dont really need the mlrs -all we have to do is to throw frag grenade across the causeway-surely hit something
country that small want to 'action'-even SAF were developed based on the malay regiment traditions-....what was the SAF moto again??was it in mandarin,english or malay???? It is a well-known fact that the SAF is much better than RMAF therefore it is a disgrace actually if we were to outshone your armed forces. Having our motto in Malay is a respect that we gave to the original inhabitants of our island unlike somebody who proclaim to be the first inhabitant of Malaya and ignore the rights of the local native tribes.
Moreover your argument has a flaw, which I am surprised that you did not notice. Most armed forces work on their strength, which in your case will be jungle warfare (we do not have so much forest that we can be very proficient in) and numerical advantage. Therefore instead of trying to show off how good your weapons are, which we know deep in our heart will never be as good as the ones that Singapore possess. Harp on your jungle ability and do not be like the British that are caught with their pants down when the Japanese attacked. They have the biggest gun in the region but look at where it has gotten them.
War between both countries is not beneficial due to the economical, social and political ties that exist between both countries. But if Malaysia ever tries, let this be a warning, we will ensure that they will regret their decision and action for a very long time.
-
i thought we got the SS-60....
-
You THOUGHT. Please, back it up with proof. I dun know what you are trying to tell us here.Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:i thought we got the SS-60.... -
DONT BLUFF LAHOriginally posted by HARIMAU:Do your maths-18 x MLRS =4 ss90 each vehicle x 120 bomblets each rounds=8460 bomblets within a few seconds.
the 300mm ASTRO2(should be SS60) can only carry 64 DPICM, where got 120??? you make in your toilet isit??
and your 180mm rocket carries even lesser at 20 DPICM....
LIER!!!!
For your info singapore also make submunitions... in fact.. we are one of the 33 nation in the world which knows and is producing submunition ammunitions...
AND... unlike malaysia... singapore is also one of the 56 nations who has build up a STOCKPILE of submunitions... and the only nation in ASEAN to do so....
so... while you run out of submunitions... we will have millions of submunitions to spare.... on you....muahahaaaa.......
Anyway.... dont feel too bad... although it has been calculated that singapore arty can flatten more then 3000 football field size of malaysian land every 15 seconds... we hopefully believe that we will not use it indiscriminately..... -
i think i conflict they will flatten not entirely by Arty ammnuntion,i think mostly by bombs from fighters.
The fighter can knock down colmuns of tank using cas.bombs,air launch hellfire missile,maverick etc.
it is quite possible singapore has casbombs a powerful airforce cant do without cas.bomb. -
the SS-60 thing was a rumour....
here are more rumours from the msian MoD...
we are probably getting both the SH and su-30...
our su30 will most probably be based on the more advanced su-30mki....
our fighter deal is gonna be worth at LEAST USD 1Billion -
...which brings us right back to the point that you're boasting about capabilities that you don't have yet. If you haven't already bought something, or haven't confirm having bought something, don't go about bragging to everyone like it has already been delivered.Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:the SS-60 thing was a rumour....
here are more rumours from the msian MoD...
we are probably getting both the SH and su-30...
our su30 will most probably be based on the more advanced su-30mki....
our fighter deal is gonna be worth at LEAST USD 1Billion
It only makes you:
1) a loud-mouthed braggart
2) a laughing stock, especially if a replay of the RMAF Tornado "deal" occurs
Don't you get it? -
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:
the SS-60 thing was a rumour....
here are more rumours from the msian MoD...
we are probably getting both the SH and su-30...
our su30 will most probably be based on the more advanced su-30mki....
our fighter deal is gonna be worth at LEAST USD 1Billion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
do u have proof of their acutal buying it???? somemore, FI also say m'sia also considering gripen, wat do u wan to say?????? there is too many rumours 4 now.....n the more debate, is still back to square 1. -
the gripen??
not much of a competitor,bcoz the RMAF doesnt really favour single engine fighters.......
i am very confident about getting the su30 and SH....you wanna be about this???how much??S$1million??
and im also very confident about AWACs in the near future...(8th malaysian plan....2001-2005).....probably Ericsson's Erieye on a Embraer ERJ-145........ -
Hahahaha...bet? You sure or not small boy...sekali RMAF Tornado Part 2 happen...Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:the gripen??
not much of a competitor,bcoz the RMAF doesnt really favour single engine fighters.......
i am very confident about getting the su30 and SH....you wanna be about this???how much??S$1million??
and im also very confident about AWACs in the near future...(8th malaysian plan....2001-2005).....probably Ericsson's Erieye on a Embraer ERJ-145........
I asked, "Don't you get it?" and its obvious you don't. Even if you are 99% sure, as long as the contract has not been signed, you shouldn't go about bragging like its gospel, because like I've said before, it only makes you
1) a loudmouth braggart
2) look like a fool when the 1% chance occurs, like the 1980s deal for Tornadoes for Malaysia -
malaysia changed its mind about the tornados bcoz it wanted to save some money for better fighters like the F/A-18 and MiG-29