Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:malaysia changed its mind about the tornados bcoz it wanted to save some money for better fighters like the F/A-18 and MiG-29
Its nothing personal...but if you keep posting arguments or poinst you can't back up with logic, reason or evidence then you have to be prepared for people to rebut you.Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:say what ever you want.....we will see....
btw,viper,why are you always nailing me???
Riiiiigggghhhhttt.....that was the very same trick HARIMAU used....no one believed him then, what makes you think we believe you now...?Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:i can give evidence,but i wont bcoz it is classified.....(im not gonna elaborate)
I never said M'sia is not getting Sewer...er...I mean Super Hornet or Su-30...all I'm saying is you should wait for comfirmation before bragging...otherwise you MIGHT malu yourself, is that so difficult to understand?Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:lets wait and see if everything i said was correct.....
(wait for our fighter deal to be announced)
........Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:malaysia changed its mind about the tornados bcoz it wanted to save some money for better fighters like the F/A-18 and MiG-29
So what? Almost all ASEAN nations had diplomatic relations with the USSR, but because during the Cold War, they were all aligned more closely to the US, the ASEAN countries would never consider buying Russian, neither would they consider selling anything to ASEAN.Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:malaysia has had diplomatic relationships with the USSR/russia for a long time(b4 the tornado deal).....
and when i said m'sia was saving for a better fighter,i didnt say they already had the hornets and migs in mind....
and you said the hornet wasnt for export yet then.....
so what?the government of malaysia(GOM) enter talks with boeing for the SHs even b4 the export of the SHs was passed......
btw,here is something about me,
i am not working for the GOM or MAF......
That's a funny statement to make.... During the confrontation, Singapore armed forces and Australian Army helped too in a big way, and Mahathir and many Malaysians don't like Singaporeans nor the Aussies.... Hmm.... I'm just wondering if your statement makes sense at all.Originally posted by Innocent_Malaysian:ok i dont want to argue with you over this matter..
btw,do you know why we are not so happy with the US??
the reason is bcoz during the Indonesian Confrontation,malaysia was too weak to defend itself.....so the CW countries like Pak,NZ and UK helped to defend us.....but when we asked the US for help,the US didnt help us bcoz we they couldnt get anything from helping us unlike thailand and the philipines...
Centurion, sorry to disagree. I respect everyone's right to free speech. But in an Internet forum like this, if someone chooses to say something, then we have to have the right to reply if we feel hes wrong. As for being harsh to Innocent M'sian, I don't think I, or Joe Black, was. The only point I and others have repeatedly asked him to do, which he has admitted he failed to do, is to quantify his argumentsOriginally posted by CenturionMBT:oie please lah, you people don't need to be so harsh on him right?
Let him have a say lah.
they didnt like the brits too.. remember that mahatir had a buy british last call not so long ago???Originally posted by Joe Black:That's a funny statement to make.... During the confrontation, Singapore armed forces and Australian Army helped too in a big way, and Mahathir and many Malaysians don't like Singaporeans nor the Aussies.... Hmm.... I'm just wondering if your statement makes sense at all.
I agree with Viper52.Originally posted by Viper52:Centurion, sorry to disagree. I respect everyone's right to free speech. But in an Internet forum like this, if someone chooses to say something, then we have to have the right to reply if we feel hes wrong. As for being harsh to Innocent M'sian, I don't think I, or Joe Black, was. The only point I and others have repeatedly asked him to do, which he has admitted he failed to do, is to quantify his arguments
Respetfully yours,
Viper52
Rebuting his arguments and calling for him to justify his claims hardly equates flaming.Originally posted by CenturionMBT:Ya . . .but he don't seem to be flaming you, so why flame him?It is HARIMAU who had been attacking you, he deserves to be the one to be flamed
Then don't...Originally posted by CenturionMBT:Haizzz. . . got nothing to say![]()
Originally posted by Viper52:Then don't...![]()
![]()