Have ministers lost their moral authority to lead?
-
And you're supposed to believe fascism actually provides the answers to all the colonial ills...Originally posted by Jontst78:The very moment they abolished public non-violent protests, the government has lost the very moral authority to lead. As these non-violent protests, and the right to free speech and peaceful assembly, was what PAP and other civil societies used to oust the british in the 50's and 60's. And now they abolish it?
-
i don think we can call ministers our leaders.....they are like the arms and legs of the people who actually run this country....they given high $$$$ so that they wont kpkb the people pulling their leash......
-
Goverment of the people, by the people, for the people.
We all singaporeans took an oath to build "a democratic society based on justice and equality", lets do our part to keep to it. -
sometimes when i browsed through this forum's threads, especially those against our ruling party, I couldn't help feeling do all the forumers who criticized actually agreed about the incapability of our leaders, or do they criticised for the sake of want-ing to "feel like someone who knows about politics"...
-
Actually, I personally feel that some of the cabinet ministers do deserve thier posts. There are actually some very capable people within the PAP. But using these capable people to lead GRCs is really low IMHO.
What I am agianst is the power that PAP has that goes unchecked. And also agianst all the injustice that all the victims suffered in the hands of the PAP regime.
Tan Wah Poiw,
JBJ,
CSJ,
Francis Seow,
Said Zahari,
Tang Liang Hong,
(funny thing is that most of the above have legal backgrounds.... wonder why)
All the victims of Operation ColdStore and Operation Spectrum. -
Tyrants have always some slight shade of virtue; they support the laws before destroying them. - VoltaireOriginally posted by Jontst78:The very moment they abolished public non-violent protests, the government has lost the very moral authority to lead. As these non-violent protests, and the right to free speech and peaceful assembly, was what PAP and other civil societies used to oust the british in the 50's and 60's. And now they abolish it?