Retuers ignorant on Sg gay issue
-
Retuers ignorant on Sg gay issue.
Reuters is ignorant ,or choose to be ignorant ,on
Singapore's gay issue.
While Reuters reported Lee Kuan Yew questions homosexuality ban,
its reporters seems ingorant of the facts and of course not to report them:
A.Unrelated Singles of same sex can buy public housing
B.Unrelated Singles of same sex can private housing!!17. I am single. Can I jointly use my CPF to buy a property with my friend/cousin?
---Residential Properties Scheme,
You can jointly use your CPF to buy the property so long as both of you are singles (i.e. unmarried, divorced or widowed) and both of you are currently not using CPF for any existing properties.
http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/
The western democratic just want to paint sg as a very conservative,
stubborn country....
2.What do you think SG gov on the gay issue when they
allow unrelated singles to buy houses and stay together?
Because of Sg situation of multi-racial,religions,there are some things
u can do quitely,but cannot talk loudly.
3.SG is conservative?What do you think when SG legalize abortion almost at the same time as US?
How about sg started to regulate prostitues few decades
ago by enforcing regulate health check up?
It need courages to admit there are prostitues in
your own country,especially yours is a new born
country.
Read LKY books why he legalised this damn old trade.
SG dares to crack durain and face the problems. -
Lau Lee's son married a man already what...
our society is the most progressive.. a male PM with a husband!
which other country can say that?
-
your post damn chim... is there a code to break?
-
Well, he is right to say that most are too conservative to accept homosexuality what, just see how people reply to this thread.
-
its amazing how lionnoisy take an effort to link urls and post pictures to make the thread look interesting...
BRAVO!! -
+1
-
What's amazing is that he does not even make a proper move to state what is his opinions, but follows up with more links and pictures...
What's somewhat more amazing is that he can't use proper english to even imply what he means, and thinks the hyperlinks and pictures will do the job. In fact his posts are so un-userfriendly that most people simply don't even bother.
What's really more amazing is that he can already get into trouble with the law for what he is doing here, and he thinks he can get away with it by blaming the mods and media for posting the articles, when of course such a defence will fail miserably. Did the "simply quoting media articles" was a defence used in the racist blogger case?
In fact think we should just do something to all his threads:
+1 -
+4
-
+1
-
+1...
-
Does he get 1 cent for every 5 posts he sends to Speakers Corner?
-
Tambah satu.
-
The term ''Balanced report'' exist only in lecture hall of journalism.
-
I don't understand this topic.
-
Lol!Originally posted by lionnoisy:The term ''Balanced report'' exist only in lecture hall of journalism.
Certainly more "balanced" then your threads!
Here's a tip: Try making sense and learning to talk like a proper person, not in hyperlinkings, one liners, and little irrelevant pictures... I mean haven't you read? Powerpoint presentations have been discovered to be quite useless in retaining audience attention.
+1 -
When the TS is lionnoisy... no one does.Originally posted by Slipshade:I don't understand this topic. -
i think with that statment, he stabbed himself in the footOriginally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:Lol!
Certainly more "balanced" then your threads!
Here's a tip: Try making sense and learning to talk like a proper person, not in hyperlinkings, one liners, and little irrelevant pictures... I mean haven't you read? Powerpoint presentations have been discovered to be quite useless in retaining audience attention.
+1
with regards to the huge amt of articles he took from papers as if they are the truth -
+1.
hmmm. i roughly get wad he means but TS i think u need to elaborate more clearly. -
lionnoisy seems to have this curious habit of thinking that the way to support your position is whatever amount of media articles you can dig up and post as links and pictures.
He seems to leave out all due process of proper independent thought in the process, as demostrated by his attempt to slam the Collins submarine in the Military Nuts forum by posting plenty of media articles on it only to be slammed and totally pwned by the forumites there who knew much more about the sub beyond the political nonsense in the media.
The thing is, this could have easily been found out had someone actually been even basically interested in the subjet and bothered to look beyond all the politics in the matter, but in his haste to toss out any dirt on the aussies, he only made them look better and himself look far worse... and even more ironic it was Singaporeans who spoke out against him.
Not surprisingly he quietly slipped out from that thread and started yet another silly one.
That why, most of the time I think his threads are worth one thing:
+1 -
Neither do I...... is he askin for options or what ?? Can't even really understand what he is writing about.....Originally posted by Slipshade:I don't understand this topic. -
Govt cannot make up its mind,23 Apr 07
Who put this misleading title? Our learned CSJ!!
Reuters' title is more neutral:Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew questions homosexuality ban
2.By allowing unrelated singles to buy public and private
housing in using CPF,sg gov make her stand very clear on gay issue.
Do u expect gov sponsor a gay party in Sentosa?
What are your wish on Gay issue? -
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
Sorry.... me lower end of the 'O' level.... just pass only. Could u again list down your question in point form
[b]Govt cannot make up its mind,23 Apr 07
Who put this misleading title? Our learned CSJ!!
Reuters' title is more neutral:Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew questions homosexuality ban
2.By allowing unrelated singles to buy public and private
housing in using CPF,sg gov make her stand very clear on gay issue.
Do u expect gov sponsor a gay party in Sentosa?
What are your wish on Gay issue?
[/b]
Like
example -
1) blah blah blah
2) blah blah blah
3).... etc
This would help greatly in understanding your thread. Thxs -
+ how many liao?
Dun care lah, I +1 more.
-
Sorry ah, for another unreadable post by lionnoisy there is but one thing to do:
+1
and lionnoisy seems to have this obsession with CSJ, always bring him up one. -
i am just following what others have been doing
+1
