And who are these leaders with higher moral standings? In fact, can you find enough throughout history to fill the entire cabinet?Originally posted by robertteh:Who started such a trend - importing citizens, salary benchmarking to benefit themselves and ignoring the plight of the people they are governing?
People are not that stupid to know that this is no longer the same government they once elected as it only cares about itself and its onw connections. Why should they be loyal to the government or country if the government is not loyal to them.
David Marshall was right - worshipping monies can lead to such a consequence where citizens no longer respect the leaders who will lose the necessary moral authority to govern them.
Today what wew are aseeing is a whole society where the government keep getting monies and more monies for itsself and its own sake and ignoring the plight of its citizens.
Something has gone seriously wrong with such a society and new leaders with higher moral standing must now be found to govern the country.
Understanding the root cause of problem is half the battle won. It is doubted if our leaders understand they are the cause many of our current problems.Originally posted by wisefool83:And who are these leaders with higher moral standings? In fact, can you find enough throughout history to fill the entire cabinet?
actually i think if they had offered them the money they would have taken it.Originally posted by richong 3216:Money worshipping is not subscriped by the great voters of hougang during the last general election. Apparently the voters were promised a very big amount of $100 million of upgrading the estate if the imcumbent MP Low Thia Kiang lost.
And what happened? The voters of hougang said "keep your damn money" (actually it's the people's money) & the result was a higher % of votes for Low TK.
Metaphorical wrote:As we have seen in the selective comparison by the ministers in many recent policies, many policies will be presented in one-sided manner to suit their convenience and short-cut solutions.
Now sg economy up already & many co now complain shortage workers & managers. If cant recruit more, their business sure kena affect & so must bring their business go other countrys. MP & ministers everyday kena whack by business co terrok terrok. We all see already also pity our mp & ministers.
That why no choice, glc co also kena force go employ more foreigners, dont say pte co.
Blame who? After gov do serious investigate few yrs, they shock because is sg people dont want work, our sg attitude is no high pay no work! No 5 day week, dont work. Must o/t, dont work.
Foreign talents they nice workers, call them do more works also ok. Everytime like do o/t. Never argue managers. Never complain pay too low. Co make money, they happy. Co lose money, they sad. Always loyal the co & managers & support gov policy & not break law.
My mp say is right: when our sg people can start learn from all the foreign talent?
They just cannot give money (cash) to the voters because it is to tentamount to vote buying which will never happen. Besides u still can take the cash & vote against them since the vote is secret. And in the end they will lose everything.Originally posted by hisoka:actually i think if they had offered them the money they would have taken it.
but its not the money, its the upgrading which actually doesn't help that much anyway. and the real value is much less than the 100 million
Metaphorical wrote:So it is now confirmed by you that your MP easily listen to one-sided arguments to allow the employers easy access to cheap but not necessary more talented foreign workers. What a shame citizens elected the MPs to have the MPs behave like this to side with foreigners and rob the local of their employment opportunities with a lot of bullshit to condemn the local without proper facts or truths.
My MP say before, foreign talents more quiet & do abit more also dont complain, not like sg workers always argue. Some boss also got say: pay foreign talents more than sg workers also worth. They never give you trouble.
He let success get to his head. After all, it's no longer a state of 'by the people, for the people.'Originally posted by justiceforall:He used to be the admired politician in the 50's and 60's.
But over the years, having too much power and with a psychologically well-bent population, made him arrogant, bolder and uncaring for the people who put him up there.
He speaks only of his businesses and profits...but seldom matters close to the hearts of Singaporeans.
Can you not feel it?
Old Folk's in Nursing Home enroll into Nursing Home HR headcount.Originally posted by justiceforall:Unfortunately, there has been recent reports stating that our unemployment rate report is grossly inaccurate.
Yes. Ministers of the first PAP cabinet in 1959 were not very paid.Originally posted by wisefool83:And who are these leaders with higher moral standings? In fact, can you find enough throughout history to fill the entire cabinet?
and singaporeans are not allowed to protest. Sad!!! Where is democracy? We work hard for the $$$$ to feed them who get tons of $$$$ to satisfy them!Originally posted by robertteh:Who started such a trend - importing citizens, salary benchmarking to benefit themselves and ignoring the plight of the people they are governing?
People are not that stupid to know that this is no longer the same government they once elected as it only cares about itself and its onw connections. Why should they be loyal to the government or country if the government is not loyal to them.
David Marshall was right - worshipping monies can lead to such a consequence where citizens no longer respect the leaders who will lose the necessary moral authority to govern them.
Today what wew are aseeing is a whole society where the government keep getting monies and more monies for itsself and its own sake and ignoring the plight of its citizens.
Something has gone seriously wrong with such a society and new leaders with higher moral standing must now be found to govern the country.
Maybe it would be more convincing if we had the statistic of the wages that the general public received during that time. Were the minister receiving a pay that is a lot higher than the public at that time, despite being "low paid"?Originally posted by hawkeye1819:Yes. Ministers of the first PAP cabinet in 1959 were not very paid.
When I started working in 1962 (in a hospital) I was paid $190/- per month.Originally posted by matleep:Maybe it would be more convincing if we had the statistic of the wages that the general public received during that time. Were the minister receiving a pay that is a lot higher than the public at that time, despite being "low paid"?
democray? it's only in the pledge you say everyday when u were in sec sch. In real life, singaopore has nothing to do with democray.Originally posted by rane:and singaporeans are not allowed to protest. Sad!!! Where is democracy? We work hard for the $$$$ to feed them who get tons of $$$$ to satisfy them!![]()
![]()
![]()
To serve the nation is top on their list or to earn tons of $$$ is on their list? What agenda do they have?