U.S. vs. China
-
Oh please... US has enough nukeheads to destroy every single country in this world. What is one China to them? They can decimate the entire China before the latter is able to fire one single nuke.Originally posted by WHATODO:What makes you think that China do not have Nuclear Warhead? China its a nuclear power country and if they retaliates by using their Nuclear Warheads on US, how?
-
China can empty their nuke arsenal on US mainland tooOriginally posted by Slipshade:Oh please... US has enough nukeheads to destroy every single country in this world. What is one China to them? -
Who goes first?Originally posted by *=Optimus=*:China can empty their nuke arsenal on US mainland too 
-
bothOriginally posted by Slipshade:Who goes first? -
ja ja ja......Please Lah.....! i think you must be very young.Originally posted by WHATODO:What makes you think that China do not have Nuclear Warhead? China its a nuclear power country and if they retaliates by using their Nuclear Warheads on US, how? -
great, now we are talking about, nuclear arsenal
why does china wants to resort to nuke usa, i can't recall, that they have ballistic missile that could reach usa, and furthermore, i doubt any country would want to use nuclear again -
You can't be too sure. US and the Soviet Union came very close to nuking each another years ago.Originally posted by allentyb:
great, now we are talking about, nuclear arsenal
why does china wants to resort to nuke usa, i can't recall, that they have ballistic missile that could reach usa, and furthermore, i doubt any country would want to use nuclear again -
China can send man into space and shot down orbitting sattelites, I dont think sending nukes to US is a problem. Besides they have enough Inter-Continental Balistic Missiles (ICBM) to hit every US cities.Originally posted by allentyb:
great, now we are talking about, nuclear arsenal
why does china wants to resort to nuke usa, i can't recall, that they have ballistic missile that could reach usa, and furthermore, i doubt any country would want to use nuclear again -
hello hellomotosxq
-
Originally posted by Slipshade:Oh please... US has enough nukeheads to destroy every single country in this world. What is one China to them? They can decimate the entire China before the latter is able to fire one single nuke.
I dont think US or China will resort to nukes, knowing that both sides have enough nukes to destroy each other until beyond recognition.
So strategic air, land and sea warfare will still be the way to go. -
Ts confirm either prc or diehard china supporter......
Cmon,if things realli get out of hand betw this 2 countries, the whole world will perish together wif them....
Thats why we have to ensure the China premier isnt ppl like hello#@!#$ or like urself.
Dun overestimate ur fellow commrades china military, yes they are improving but that doesnt mean they are the best. -
I think we alos have to ensure that US president isnt ppl like Bush or like urself (arrogant)?Originally posted by Hamiltonian1125:Ts confirm either prc or diehard china supporter......
Cmon,if things realli get out of hand betw this 2 countries, the whole world will perish together wif them....
Thats why we have to ensure the China premier isnt ppl like hello#@!#$ or like urself.
Dun overestimate ur fellow commrades china military, yes they are improving but that doesnt mean they are the best.
Also dun overestimate ur fellow commrades US military, yes they are the best in term of technology but that doesnt mena they are the best i.e. strategy on Iraq and the fight against Terrorism. -
hmmmOriginally posted by Slipshade:You can't be too sure. US and the Soviet Union came very close to nuking each another years ago.
you are referring to the cuban incident -
They would go to war when President Chen of Taiwan mention or rather shout the magical words.
-
U are just copying my word...typical china man...pirates....cmon my post also want to copy and then claim to be "made in china"???Originally posted by WHATODO:I think we alos have to ensure that US president isnt ppl like Bush or like urself (arrogant)?
Also dun overestimate ur fellow commrades US military, yes they are the best in term of technology but that doesnt mena they are the best i.e. strategy on Iraq and the fight against Terrorism.
BTW BUSH DID NOT NUKE U PPL...so even if u were to copy my style , use some brain....bush is the president now and u should thank God he isnt that mad to nuke china....
Go la ,go and copy everyone post and claim them to be made in china la...cheap cheap... -
are you so ready to use nuke as a deterance against the US? Are you PLA properganda machine in this forum. You have no interest in the rest of the Asia!Originally posted by WHATODO:I think we alos have to ensure that US president isnt ppl like Bush or like urself (arrogant)?
Also dun overestimate ur fellow commrades US military, yes they are the best in term of technology but that doesnt mena they are the best i.e. strategy on Iraq and the fight against Terrorism.
If you are Singaporean, I suggest you find out what is going to sit behind your house. Potential radiation fallout.
Article from BBC.
A Russian plan to build a nuclear research centre in Burma has been heavily criticised by US officials.
State Department spokesman Tom Casey said the Asian state had neither the "legal frame" nor the "safeguard provisions" for a nuclear programme.
Russia's atomic energy body, Rosatom, said the project would be monitored by the UN's nuclear agency, the IAEA.
The US and EU maintain sanctions against Burma, accusing its military rulers of human rights abuses.
Rosatom announced the deal in Moscow on Tuesday, saying the centre would include a 10-megawatt light-water reactor and facilities for processing and storing nuclear waste.
In a statement, Russia pledged to train 300-350 specialists for the centre - although no timescale for construction was given.
Environment query
Mr Casey said the US had a "general sense" that Burma had "neither the regulatory or legal frame nor safeguard provisions" for a country to be able to handle such a programme.
He expressed concern that there were "no accounting mechanisms or other kinds of security procedures" to prevent nuclear fuel from being stolen.
"We would be concerned about the possibility for accidents, for environmental damage, or for proliferation simply by the possibility of fuel being diverted, stolen or otherwise removed," he said.
The proposed reactor could not be used for a nuclear weapons programme, says the BBC's Steven Eke.
But the deal will again raise questions about Russia's willingness to export nuclear know-how to countries the West considers repressive or hostile, our correspondent adds.
Russia's nuclear co-operation with Iran - who the US and other nations accuse of trying to develop nuclear weapons - has been a source of tension between Moscow and western nations.
The military have ruled Burma since 1962. Opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, whose NLD party won general elections in 1990, has been under house arrest in the country's former capital, Rangoon, for several years. -
The way to go for what?Originally posted by WHATODO:So strategic air, land and sea warfare will still be the way to go. -
no cannot.
singapore's economy is reliant on both country. dey go war = we suffer. later everything become expensive den how? -
Originally posted by Hamiltonian1125:
I think he was very clever to use your own words to show the absurdity in your statement, but clearly irony is something beyond your limited grasp of English language.
U are just copying my word...typical china man...pirates....cmon my post also want to copy and then claim to be "made in china"???
BTW BUSH DID NOT NUKE U PPL...so even if u were to copy my style , use some brain....bush is the president now and u should thank God he isnt that mad to nuke china....
Go la ,go and copy everyone post and claim them to be made in china la...cheap cheap...
I hope your history knowledge isn't as bad, you did know US is the only country that ever used nukes on civilians, right? On Asians nonetheless. It's been said Truman wouldn't have dropped the nuke if it weren't to be used on some yellow faces. Yeah, you have one too.
Last time I heard, Hu didn't invade Iraq, Afghanistan. China hasn't been busy dropping bombs and installing "freedom" around the world. But same can't be said about Bush. "use some brain", even Americans aren't as optimistic about Bush as you do. LOL. -
Originally posted by Slipshade:
So US has WMDs that will incinerate the whole Earth many times over ... why is that something to be that proud of? especially and oddly, for Singaporeans?
Oh please... US has enough nukeheads to destroy every single country in this world. What is one China to them? They can decimate the entire China before the latter is able to fire one single nuke. -
we also have to ensure China premier and others Chinese leaders aren't people like ah bian or you (stupid)?Originally posted by WHATODO:I think we alos have to ensure that US president isnt ppl like Bush or like urself (arrogant)?
Also dun overestimate ur fellow commrades US military, yes they are the best in term of technology but that doesnt mena they are the best i.e. strategy on Iraq and the fight against Terrorism.
Also dun overestimate ur fellow comrades PLA, they still have to depend on Russia for military technology, and they better not be sure they can still count on what they used to, the cheap life of chinese soldiers (ren hai zhan shu).
The yankees had learned from the vietnamese, and so did the PLA (DO NOT FORGET). and now if they have to learn from fighting the Iraqi and the war against terrorism, what makes you think the PLA can do better?
-
they go war..Originally posted by hiphop2009:no cannot.
singapore's economy is reliant on both country. dey go war = we suffer. later everything become expensive den how?
dunno whether still got any country left in the world or not.. -
Originally posted by Fatum:
this is from a US congressional report:
the danger is not in the US attacking China ... the danger is in China, thinking it can defeat the US military, makes some silly moves and plunge the whole region into war ....
http://www.history.navy.mil/wars/foabroad.htm
....
1986 -- Bolivia. U.S. Army personnel and aircraft assisted Bolivia in anti-drug operations.
1987-88 -- Persian Gulf. After the Iran-Iraq War resulted in several military incidents in the Persian Gulf, the United States increased U.S. Navy forces operating in the Persian Gulf and adopted a policy of reflagging and escorting Kuwaiti oil tankers through the Gulf. President Reagan reported that U.S. ships had been fired upon or struck mines or taken other military action on September 23, October 10, and October 20, 1987 and April 19, July 4, and July 14, 1988. The United States gradually reduced its forces after a cease-fire between Iran and Iraq on August 20, 1988.
1988 -- Panama. In mid-March and April 1988, during a period of instability in Panama and as pressure grew for Panamanian military leader General Manuel Noriega to resign, the United States sent 1,000 troops to Panama, to "further safeguard the canal, U.S. lives, property and interests in the area." The forces supplemented 10,000 U.S. military personnel already in Panama.
1989 -- Libya. On January 4, 1989, two U.S. Navy F-14 aircraft based on USS John F. Kennedy shot down two Libyan jet fighters over the Mediterranean Sea about 70 miles north of Libya. The U.S. pilots said the Libyan planes had demonstrated hostile intentions.
1989 -- Panama. On May 11, 1989, in response to General Noriega's disregard of the results of the Panamanian election, President Bush ordered a brigade- sized force of approximately 1,900 troops to augment the estimated 11,000 U.S. forces already in the area.
1989 -- Andean Initiative in War on Drugs. On September 15, 1989, President Bush announced that military and law enforcement assistance would be sent to help the Andean nations of Colombia, Bolivia, and Peru combat illicit drug producers and traffickers. By mid-September there were 50- 100 U.S. military advisers in Colombia in connection with transport and training in the use of military equipment, plus seven Special Forces teams of 2-12 persons to train troops in the three countries.
1989 -- Philippines. On December 2, 1989, President Bush reported that on December 1 U.S. fighter planes from Clark Air Base in the Philippines had assisted the Aquino government to repel a coup attempt. In addition, 100 marines were sent from the U.S. Navy base at Subic Bay to protect the U.S. Embassy in Manila.
1989 -- Panama. On December 21, 1989, President Bush reported that he had ordered U.S. military forces to Panama to protect the lives of American citizens and bring General Noriega to justice. By February 13, 1990, all the invasion forces had been withdrawn.
1990 -- Liberia. On August 6, 1990, President Bush reported that a reinforced rifle company had been sent to provide additional security to the U.S. Embassy in Monrovia, and that helicopter teams had evacuated U.S. citizens from Liberia.
1990 -- Saudi Arabia. On August 9, 1990, President Bush reported that he had ordered the forward deployment of substantial elements of the U.S. armed forces into the Persian Gulf region to help defend Saudi Arabia after the August 2 invasion of Kuwait by Iraq. On November 16, 1990, he reported the continued buildup of the forces to ensure an adequate offensive military option.
1991 -- Iraq. On January 18, 1991, President Bush reported that he had directed U.S. armed forces to commence combat operations on January 16 against Iraqi forces and military targets in Iraq and Kuwait, in conjunction with a coalition of allies and U.N. Security Council resolutions. On January 12 Congress had passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq Resolution (P.L. 102-1). Combat operations were suspended on February 28, 1991.
1991 -- Iraq. On May 17, 1991, President Bush stated in a status report to Congress that the Iraqi repression of the Kurdish people had necessitated a limited introduction of U.S. forces into northern Iraq for emergency relief purposes.
1991 -- Zaire. On September 25-27, 1991, after widespread looting and rioting broke out in Kinshasa, U.S. Air Force C-141s transported 100 Belgian troops and equipment into Mnshasa. U.S. planes also carried 300 French troops into the Central African Republic and hauled back American citizens and third country nationals from locations outside Zaire.
1992 -- Sierra Leone. On May 3, 1992, U.S. military planes evacuated Americans from Sierra Leone, where military leaders had overthrown the government.
1992 -- Kuwait. On August 3, 1992, the United States began a series of military exercises in Kuwait, following Iraqi refusal to recognize a new border drawn up by the United Nations and refusal to cooperate with U.N. inspection teams.
1992 -- Iraq. On September 16, 1992 President Bush stated in a status report that he had ordered U.S. participation in the enforcement of a prohibition against Iraqi flights in a specified zone in southern Iraq, and aerial reconnaissance to monitor Iraqi compliance with the cease-fire resolution.
1992 -- Somalia. On December 10, 1992, President Bush reported that he had deployed U.S. armed forces to Somalia in response to a humanitarian crisis and a U.N. Security Council Resolution determining that the situation constituted a threat to international peace. This operation, called Operation Restore Hope, was part of a U.S.-led United Nations Unified Task Force (UNITAF) and came to an end on May 4, 1993. U.S. forces continued to participate in the successor United Nations Operation in Somalia (UNOSOM II), which the U.N. Security Council authorized to assist Somalia in political reconciliation and restoration of peace.
1993 -- Iraq. On January 19, 1993, President Bush said in a status report that on December 27, 1992, U.S. aircraft shot down an Iraqi aircraft in the prohibited zone; on January 13 aircraft from the United States and coalition partners had attacked missile bases in southern Iraq; and further military actions had occured on January 17 and 18. Administration officials said the United States was deploying a battalion task force to Kuwait to underline the continuing U.S. commitment to Kuwaiti independence.
1993 -- Iraq. On January 21, 1993, shortly after his inauguration, President Clinton said the United States would continue the Bush policy on Iraq, and U.S. aircraft fired at targets in Iraq after pilots sensed Iraqi radar or anti-aircraft fire directed at them.
1993 -- Bosnia-Hercegovina. On February 28, 1993, the United States bagan an airdrop of relief supplies aimed at Muslims surrounded by Serbian forces in Bosnia.
1993 -- Bosnia-Hercegovina. On April 13, 1993, President Clinton reported U.S. forces were participating in a NATO air action to enforce a U.N. ban on all unauthorized military flights over Bosnia-Hercegovina.
1993 -- Iraq. In a status report on Iraq of May 24, President Clinton said that on April 9 and April 18 U.S. warplanes had bombed or fired missiles at Iraqi anti-aircraft sites which had tracked U.S. aricraft.
1993 -- Somalia. On June 10, 1993, President Clinton reported that in response to attacks against U.N. forces in Somalia by a factional leader, the U.S. Quick Reaction Force in the area had participated in military action to quell the violence. The quick reaction force was part of the U.S. contribution to a success On July 1, President Clinton reported further air and ground military operations on June 12 and June 17 aimed at neutralizing military capabilities that had impeded U.N. efforts to deliver humanitarian relief and promote national reconstruction, and additional instances occurred in the following months.
1993 -- Iraq. On June 28, 1993, President Clinton reported that on June 26 U.S. naval forces had launched missiles against the Iraqi Intelligence Service's headquarters in Baghdad in response to an unsuccessful attempt to assassinate former President Bush in Kuwait in April 1993.
1993 -- Iraq. In a status report of July 22, 1993, President Clinton said on June 19 a U.S. aircraft had fired a missile at an Iraqi anti-aircraft site displaying hostile intent. U.S. planes also bombed an Iraqi missile battery on August 19, 1993.
1993 -- Macedonia. On July 9, 1993, President Clinton reported the deployment of 350 U.S. armed forces to Macedonia to participate in the U.N. Protection Force to help maintain stability in the area of former Yugoslavia. -
hmmm..... surprised even chinese like you can forget history.Originally posted by YaoRockets:I hope your history knowledge isn't as bad, you did know US is the only country that ever used nukes on civilians, right? On Asians nonetheless. It's been said Truman wouldn't have dropped the nuke if it weren't to be used on some yellow faces. Yeah, you have one too. or history is to be used only to suit your own purpose?
if not for the nukes, how many more chinese life would have to be sacrificed? how much longer would the japanese imperialists be holding on to the land of china?
If it is the yellow faces who deserved to be punished so that many other faces, red, black, yellow, white can be liberated, then the yellow faces shall be nuked.
Go back and tell your premier hu it was wrong for US to nuke the japs in ww2 and stop arguing about the changing of textbooks by the japs.
No wonder it will be a long long way before you people from PRC can speak for all other ethnic Chinese outside China, though we are the minority. -
Just nuke the north and south poles and melt the ice