Singapore's 6.5 million Population 50 years into the Future
-
From 2000 to 2005, population has increased from 4,017,700 to 4,351,400, while the composition of citizens has decreased from 74% to 71.5%, a geometric decrease of 0.685% per year (0.5% per year arithmetic).
Shows that we are losing more citizens through migration than the authorities would let us know.
If the trend in decreasing citizens continue, when we reach 6.5 million population in 50 years time, we would have 50.70% citizens, while Permanent Residents and Others would make up 49.30%.
(71.5%) X (1 - 0.00685)^50 = 50.70%
Source: Department of Statistics
-
wow
-
How come the PAP supporters who claim that we are getting more citizens than losing them, not making making any statements now?
-
i think the following factors compound the issue:
a. low birthrate
b. aging population = higher death rate
c. higher immigration / PR issuance. -
Yes to all the above. But not many PRs wants to take up citizenship. Maybe it's because of the draconian laws here and constant raising of GST to help the poor.Originally posted by red_amoeba:i think the following factors compound the issue:
a. low birthrate
b. aging population = higher death rate
c. higher immigration / PR issuance. -
d. smarter singaporeansOriginally posted by red_amoeba:i think the following factors compound the issue:
a. low birthrate
b. aging population = higher death rate
c. higher immigration / PR issuance. -
forgot to add if what type of citizens, FT-citizens or born and bred onesOriginally posted by maurizio13:From 2000 to 2005, population has increased from 4,017,700 to 4,351,400, while the composition of citizens has decreased from 74% to 71.5%, a geometric decrease of 0.685% per year (0.5% per year arithmetic).
Shows that we are losing more citizens through migration than the authorities would let us know.
If the trend in decreasing citizens continue, when we reach 6.5 million population in 50 years time, we would have 50.70% citizens, while Permanent Residents and Others would make up 49.30%.
(71.5%) X (1 - 0.00685)^50 = 50.70%
Source: Department of Statistics
-
Imagine your neighbours left and right of you to be ang mohs in 50 years time.
-
You talking about Singapore or other countries (when Singaporeans emigrate). In Singapore, 50 years time, you won't see ang mohs, you will only see more mainland Chinese and ah nehs. Smart ang mohs who receive so much freedom and welfare from their home country will never settle here, only the mullets will settle here.Originally posted by CoolMyth:Imagine your neighbours left and right of you to be ang mohs in 50 years time. 
-
you mean FTs?Originally posted by GHoST_18:d. smarter singaporeans -
Originally posted by GHoST_18:d. smarter singaporeans
-
okay.. you say 6.5m
the other says extinct..
which is which? -
if 50 years oredi liddat, den how abt 100 years?? will there still be such a thing as a singaporean? or will singapore be just a temporary living place for foreigners and others??
singaporeans== endangered??? -
Another BULLCRAP from M13 that is not worth reading...Originally posted by maurizio13:From 2000 to 2005, population has increased from 4,017,700 to 4,351,400, while the composition of citizens has decreased from 74% to 71.5%, a geometric decrease of 0.685% per year (0.5% per year arithmetic).
Shows that we are losing more citizens through migration than the authorities would let us know.
If the trend in decreasing citizens continue, when we reach 6.5 million population in 50 years time, we would have 50.70% citizens, while Permanent Residents and Others would make up 49.30%.
(71.5%) X (1 - 0.00685)^50 = 50.70% -
Originally posted by Gazelle:Another BULLCRAP from M13 that is not worth reading...
Pot calling the kettle black. -
btw. M13 find it pretty amused by my BAR thread, since you are someone who have slept with a married women, what do you think about women giving man BJ and man smelling women's panties?Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:
Pot calling the kettle black. -
Ah, I have no wish to partake in your petty and cheap shot at me. My lady is a legally divorced woman who deserves no less respect for who she is, regardless of what you think.Originally posted by Gazelle:btw. M13 find it pretty amused by my BAR thread, since you are someone who have slept with a married women, what do you think about women giving man BJ and man smelling women's panties?
But I am indeed flabbergasted at the immense pride you take at some of your ''private activities''. I've nothing against you doing that to please whatever pervertic and indeed sickening interests you may hold, but please stop washing your private linens in public. They are hideous to say the least! -
So how does it feel to be sleeping with a married women? Have you met her ex husband before? And is he a BIGGER man than you?Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:Ah, I have no wish to partake in your petty and cheap shot at me. My lady is a legally divorced woman who deserves no less respect for who she is, regardless of what you think.
But I am indeed flabbergasted at the immense pride you take at some of your ''private activities''. I've nothing against you doing that to please whatever pervertic and indeed sickening interests you may hold, but please stop washing your private linens in public. They are hideous to say the least! -
Hehe you are really a pervert, interested in knowing the size of other men.Originally posted by Gazelle:So how does it feel to be sleeping with a married women? Have you met her ex husband before? And is he a BIGGER man than you? -
stop pretending to be innocent lah.Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:Hehe you are really a pervert, interested in knowing the size of other men. -
It seemed more foreigners applying for PR is is increasing compared to 800 local leaving each year.
-
The net effect (foreigners becoming citizens and citizens leaving Singapore) of citizenship is an outflow of citizens, we lose more citizens than we gain from foreigners.Originally posted by will4:It seemed more foreigners applying for PR is is increasing compared to 800 local leaving each year.
From 2000 to 2005, we lost around 0.5% citizens a year. The composition of citizenship has dropped from 74.0% to 71.5%.
Proves that more Singaporeans are giving up their citizenship than there are foreigners taking up citizenship.
When we hit 6.5 million population, we will be on a 50:50 ratio with the foreigners. -
Haha I know I confirm not innocent.Originally posted by Gazelle:stop pretending to be innocent lah. 
Anyway cheers Gazelle, I don't see an end to this. Truce accepted? -
Huh ? Gazelle a spy for PAP ???
Seriously speaking I doubt so, I believe he is more than of a liability than anything else
Anywhere who would want his party to be associated with a panty smelling moron? Of course Bill Clinton is another case -
Hahaha......Originally posted by miserable:Huh ? Gazelle a spy for PAP ???
Seriously speaking I doubt so, I believe he is more than of a liability than anything else
Anywhere who would want his party to be associated with a panty smelling moron? Of course Bill Clinton is another case
The image of a sexually deprived lao fu zi character, going to a friend's house to steal the sister's panties to sniff just tickles my funny bone. And he claims that it's normal sexual behaviour, the rest of us are sexually deprived.
I mean still something valuable lah. Nowadays, no honour amongst thieves.
Hehehe.......