What people think of Singapore
-
there are people who love to challenge those who speak up though it is a known fact that we have such a FSWQYURIRRO ---> (lost in words to describe them), low class govt!Originally posted by maurizio13:Ya rite to what? Can you please provide more higher order thinking and analysis here? Does your affirmative agrees with all my statements? -
the above sounds so arrogant, umm, attitude problem!!!Originally posted by crazy monkey:wats the point of analysing the rubbish you post ? a line of rebuttal is good enough. -
wats the point of challenging for the sake of challenging ?Originally posted by qlqq9:there are people who love to challenge those who speak up though it is a known fact that we have such a FSWQYURIRRO ---> (lost in words to describe them), low class govt! -
Then I suggest you stick to eating bananas and climbing trees. A forum, is a place for discussions, I haven't seen you participating in much discussions. Only simple one liners from a lower order primate.Originally posted by crazy monkey:wats the point of analysing the rubbish you post ? a line of rebuttal is good enough. -
that's the reason why I don't really read local newspapers and watch the local news. Nothing but propaganda and some actresses and actors acting in sketch, drama!Originally posted by Rock^Star:There was this GST survey that I read over CNA.com: 'Only 6% of shops surveyed attempted GST profiteering' or something along that line.
I read the article and just shook my head.
Propaganda. And it just papers over the cracks so conveniently.
This is the dot com era. Do they think Singaporeans are stupid?
It defeats the purpose to have newspapers in our country when it is a tool used for propaganda purpose. -
ya rite.Originally posted by maurizio13:Then I suggest you stick to eating bananas and climbing trees. A forum, is a place for discussions, I haven't seen you participating in much discussions. Only simple one liners from a lower order primate.
-
No contentions here, since you agree with my statements.Originally posted by crazy monkey:ya rite. 
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Do you dispute with my statement that media is used to brainwash the populace?
Do you dispute that our media is controlled by the government?
Do you dispute that none of the 66.6% are being subliminally programmed by our propaganda media?
Nice one liner reply again, shows no in depth understanding of issues. If all universities could accept a one liner thesis or dissertation.
Maybe someday all the PAP MPs in parliament will provide one liner reponse.
Stupidity is a subjective opinion. Wonder how does one prove it? If I think you are stupid, does it mean I have to prove it? here you go again. You made a one liner remark, "I am afraid the 66.6% are still so". Then you are asked "have you done any survey to back up your claim" ? you started answering one questions with more questions. The one liner is not a reply but a question, you expect a question in the form of a thesis or dissertation? then come words like "stupidity" .....
shoot the fellow down if indeed stupid remark was made, but you are shooting yourself all the time, ..... 
-
Do you understand a statement of fact and a statement of opinion?Originally posted by sgdiehard: here you go again. You made a one liner remark, "I am afraid the 66.6% are still so". Then you are asked "have you done any survey to back up your claim" ? you started answering one questions with more questions. The one liner is not a reply but a question, you expect a question in the form of a thesis or dissertation? then come words like "stupidity" .....
shoot the fellow down if indeed stupid remark was made, but you are shooting yourself all the time, .....
So your understanding of one liners is, 7 sentences you quoted from my reply is a 1 liner equivalent to crazy monkey?
The 7 liner response is to query his one liner or sometimes two worded replies. I am unable to ascertain his disagreement with any of my sentences. How is it possible to post any credible replies. Most of the time he says "ya rite", which in my opinion agrees with what I have to say.
If you think you are capable of taking me on, why not dig up all the old topics which we have discussed and take me on again? -
May I ask your purpose of posting such a message, are you nitpicking? shoot, use what may I ask, you mean you saw the person use a gun to shoot? shoot shoot shoot! Focus on the discussion, why spend time to find fault?Originally posted by sgdiehard: here you go again. You made a one liner remark, "I am afraid the 66.6% are still so". Then you are asked "have you done any survey to back up your claim" ? you started answering one questions with more questions. The one liner is not a reply but a question, you expect a question in the form of a thesis or dissertation? then come words like "stupidity" .....
shoot the fellow down if indeed stupid remark was made, but you are shooting yourself all the time, ..... -
huh, these two are into finding fault rather than coming here to discuss. They have nothing better to do but to find fault when people are into discussion.Originally posted by maurizio13:Do you understand a statement of fact and a statement of opinion?
So your understanding of one liners is, 7 sentences you quoted from my reply is a 1 liner equivalent to crazy monkey? -
They could be kids.Originally posted by qlqq9:huh, these two are into finding fault rather than coming here to discuss. They have nothing better to do but to find fault when people are into discussion. -
they think and act like kids. that sgdiehard has served NS, I suppose he is in his early twenties or late teens. crazy horse has been around and I read his irritating posts to challenge others in other forums and sometimes are told off by people. Anyway, they love to attract attention by behaving such, such is a behaviour of toddlers.Originally posted by maurizio13:They could be kids. -
Crazy Monkey is scared.
-
The reporter's attitude is that freedom is the best thing we all can have. Sadly, not many people can actually appreciate freedom, much less make use of it.
-
Always be suspicious when
1. The media praises the government very often, almost as a habit.
2. Citizens can be relegated to the rear and immigrants given intangible comparative benefits.
3. There is a lack of investigative journalism in the largest circulating press.
add more as you go along.. -
It is not too difficult to find fault, especially it is the same thing repeating itself. You call that discussion?Originally posted by qlqq9:huh, these two are into finding fault rather than coming here to discuss. They have nothing better to do but to find fault when people are into discussion. -
just answer this question, is your motive of coming to this forum to nitpick at whatever which are not up to your fancy. You are happier to play your computer games.Originally posted by sgdiehard:It is not too difficult to find fault, especially it is the same thing repeating itself. You call that discussion?
If you find that the discussion is not up to your standard, you can jolly well don't visit and post here. Nobody here is pointing any gun at you to force you to come here to post. -
4. Media is selective in reporting as in the case of the GST hike. Stating that no shoppers and retailers are affected. REport all that is beneficial to the ruling party.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Always be suspicious when
1. The media praises the government very often, almost as a habit.
2. Citizens can be relegated to the rear and immigrants given intangible comparative benefits.
3. There is a lack of investigative journalism in the largest circulating press.
add more as you go along..
OUr local media cannot be investigative journalism as they are under the control of the gahmen. -
The people here are not entertainers to provide you with new things, new ideas to entertain you. WE people here owe you nothing to provide entertainment to you, kid.Originally posted by sgdiehard:It is not too difficult to find fault, especially it is the same thing repeating itself. You call that discussion? -
If you can only see it as "the same points repeating itself", then what have you learnt from participating in SC?Originally posted by sgdiehard:It is not too difficult to find fault, especially it is the same thing repeating itself. You call that discussion?
There are new forumites coming in everyday. These discussions may seem stale to some but it is refreshing to others. It may also jog the minds of the regulars in SC and Sgforums. No matter what, there are always new perpectives even when reading the same topics again....unless one chooses not to see them. -
Sometimes you can't blame the points repeating itself, because some of the points are fundamental issues which affects Singapore as a whole.
Some imbeciles treat Speaker's Corner as a Lost, Desperate Housewives or Prison Break serial, they expect new stories every episode. Some issues which forumers feel that there is a case for discussion, they will post it here, not like as if we are the writers for Lost, where every episode we churn out something interesting to keep the audiences glued to their seats.
If the idiots want more interesting topics, suggest they ask the regime create more self serving policies, so that they can have more interesting topics for discussion everyday. -
Originally posted by maurizio13:Sometimes you can't blame the points repeating itself, because some of the points are fundamental issues which affects Singapore as a whole.
Some imbeciles treat Speaker's Corner as a Lost, Desperate Housewives or Prison Break serial, they expect new stories every episode. Some issues which forumers feel that there is a case for discussion, they will post it here, not like as if we are the writers for Lost, where every episode we churn out something interesting to keep the audiences glued to their seats.
If the idiots want more interesting topics, suggest they ask the regime create more self serving policies, so that they can have more interesting topics for discussion everyday. -
ya rite. who's clone are you btw ?Originally posted by qlqq9:they think and act like kids. that sgdiehard has served NS, I suppose he is in his early twenties or late teens. crazy horse has been around and I read his irritating posts to challenge others in other forums and sometimes are told off by people. Anyway, they love to attract attention by behaving such, such is a behaviour of toddlers. -
when i reply to kids i have to keep things simple so they can understand.Originally posted by maurizio13:They could be kids.