SDP is SINGAPORE DEMORALIZE PARTY.
-
Wrong answer, Mat....Originally posted by Mat Toro:
Original post by Atobe:
Do you know ?
If you do not know, what are you insinuating with your cynical tone in the question asked ?
Do you know where the Singapore Money is going when the surplus is transferred from the Finance Ministry to GIC and Temasek Holdings ?
Where are the Annual Profits announced by GIC, Temasek and all the Government Linked Companies that got its funding from the SURPLUS PUBLIC FUNDS transferred from the Finance Ministry ?
Do you know ?-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong anology sir.
There is obvious transfer of money although we do not know the details.
However, Chee activities is not one that generates income for a service rendered, yet he has the money to travel abroad to attack Singapore. So there is every logic and reason to question, 'where did the money come from?'.
You should think more critically..... if you do not know the details, how can you assume the ''obvious transfers of money'' ?
The fact that we do not know the details demand that we should be more persistent in getting such details.
What are you insinuating that Dr Chee's activities in NOT one that generates income for a service rendered ?
Have you been using the service of a neuropsychologist and paid for such services to know that it is insignificant sums ?
What logic and justifiable reasons are there for you to question Dr Chee's sources of income when he is not even in Public Office ?
Is there not more logic and justifiable reason to pursue the questions as to the transparent accounting of GIC and Temasek ?
How will Temasek account for the loss of S$3 BILLION in the Shin Corp debacle ?
Will it be buried and the political cost of such a failed investment of Singapore Public Money be forgotten ?
Where is the justifiable accountability ?
You probably have a bad mental deficiency and have not seen the services of Dr Chee or any other neuro-psychologists, which explains for your persistent hang-ups with Dr Chee's income.
Hang-ups are indication of some psychiatric or psychological problems.
It is bad. -
he has the right to take money that ppl willing give him, be it a grant, sponsorship, donation or watsoever lah. he has family to feed also.Originally posted by Mat Toro:so do you how how Chee got so much money to travel the world?
You dunno? -
Ich kann nicht die unterrichten, die nicht erlernen.
Ironie ist eine verlorene kunst heute. -
Originally posted by Atobe:
The one who really needs critical thinking is you.
Wrong answer, Mat....
You should think more critically..... if you do not know the details, how can you assume the ''obvious transfers of money'' ?
The fact that we do not know the details demand that we should be more persistent in getting such details.
The source of the funding for the govt bodies are clear, the details may not be there but the source is not in doubt.
The source of funding for Chee isn't. So where is there basis for comparison.
Is Chee even open about his source? Nope.
So what service does he render to get paid? kindly explain to us all so we can understand.
What are you insinuating that Dr Chee's activities in [b]NOT one that generates income for a service rendered ?
Is he a practicing neuropsychologist? Are you saying he still have an active practice?
Have you been using the service of a neuropsychologist and paid for such services to know that it is insignificant sums ?
Chee is involve in local politics right? Do you know that foreign funding isn't allowed for local politics?
What logic and justifiable reasons are there for you to question Dr Chee's sources of income when he is not even in Public Office ?
Nope, not in this context, there is no basis for comparison.
Is there not more logic and justifiable reason to pursue the questions as to the transparent accounting of GIC and Temasek ?
Temasek and GIC don't get involve in politics.
Bad business decision. Just like any fund out there. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, its that simple.
How will Temasek account for the loss of S$3 BILLION in the Shin Corp debacle ?
You fellas do have a hang up in defending Chee's shady funding? Don't you have psychiatric or psychological problems according to your logic?
Hang-ups are indication of some psychiatric or psychological problems.
It is bad.
[/b] -
This is getting ridiculous. This moron has successfully hijacked the thread and attempted to steer it in the direction of something that is not only distorts the issue, and it is a clear attempt at ad hominen on Mr Chee.
Atobe, ignore this fool so we can then get on with our lives. -
You certainly can't debate anyway, so might as well ignore me mr.FN, please.
-
Is the source of the funding for GIC and Temasek ever in doubt ?Originally posted by Mat Toro:
Originally posted by Atobe:
Wrong answer, Mat....
You should think more critically..... if you do not know the details, how can you assume the ''obvious transfers of money'' ?
The fact that we do not know the details demand that we should be more persistent in getting such details.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The one who really needs critical thinking is you.
The source of the funding for the govt bodies are clear, the details may not be there but the source is not in doubt.
The source of funding for Chee isn't. So where is there basis for comparison.
Is Chee even open about his source? Nope.
You surely do not even read carefully let alone have any ability to think critically.
The question was your previous response with your statement that - ''the 'PROFIT' was obviously transferred but I do not have the details''.
My question asked again is - 'where are the PROFITS from Temasek and GIC investment of Singapore's PUBLIC MONEY' ?
Are there anyone here interested or concerned with Chee's source of money ?
You tell me, since you were the one who is fixated with his source of income and had said that his activities DO NOT generate enough income for him to travel.
What are you insinuating that Dr Chee's activities in NOT one that generates income for a service rendered ?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So what service does he render to get paid? kindly explain to us all so we can understand.
Why don't you ask him all that you are guessing and wasting your time posing your questions here ? Just head to SDP address and be forthright with your views and questions.
Have you been using the service of a neuropsychologist and paid for such services to know that it is insignificant sums ?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he a practicing neuropsychologist? Are you saying he still have an active practice?
Am I - or is anyone here in this Speakers' Corner - his Keeper ?
Finally, you expose the background of all your pretentious ignorance in being fixated with the question to his source of income.
What logic and justifiable reasons are there for you to question Dr Chee's sources of income when he is not even in Public Office ?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chee is involve in local politics right? Do you know that foreign funding isn't allowed for local politics?
Do you think the Singapore Government will not know more about his source of funding than anyone of us here in this Forum ?
What is to you even if he is paid by the CIA who will provide money anonymously for some University in Australia to employ him to give a series of Lecture ?
What makes you think that the CIA or the Chinese Government or any other parties will also not also pay some organisation to engage someone from the Singapore Government to attend and give a Lecture at a Private Function organised by a supposedly ''Private Enterprise'' or ''University'' ?
Will anyone of us know who is funding the Think Tank that engages LKY to be a member ?
GIC and Temasek is part of the POLITICAL STRUCTURE of the Singapore Government and the Ruling Party.
Is there not more logic and justifiable reason to pursue the questions as to the transparent accounting of GIC and Temasek ?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not in this context, there is no basis for comparison.
Temasek and GIC don't get involve in politics.
It is manned by Political Appointees - can they not get involved in the political process ?
Bad decision, or simply a dereliction of political responsibility in a total lack of due diligence in managing Singaporean's Money collected from a web of taxation policies.
How will Temasek account for the loss of S$3 BILLION in the Shin Corp debacle ?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bad business decision. Just like any fund out there. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, its that simple.
You certainly can be callous in giving excuses with the loss of $3 BILLION - how much did they assure you of your survival ?
Carpetbeggars love to live on carpets, unfortunately yours will be only a mat.
Mat, take a mat and lie in the corner and suck on your thumb.
Hang-ups are indication of some psychiatric or psychological problems.
It is bad.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You fellas do have a hang up in defending Chee's shady funding? Don't you have psychiatric or psychological problems according to your logic?
You surely cannot look cute when you are hung and dried, and still attempt to imitate so poorly what has been directed at you.
Are we hang up defending Chee's position, or are we simply questioning your perverted hang up with Chee's source of income - when there are more important issues concerning Singapore Public Money that is not transparently accounted, while being managed by the GIC and Temasek Holding ? -
He has disappeared in thin air! After not able to get anything out of it, he has gone back to the gang?!Originally posted by HyperFocal:hmmmm....
I wonder where's that OPF (Oddly Polite Fellow), 'Daddy!'...?
He's a much friendlier Agent....
-
This thread is about SDP. If you are interested in Temasek, you can always start a new thread.Originally posted by Atobe:Mat, take a mat and lie in the corner and suck on your thumb.
You surely cannot look cute when you are hung and dried, and still attempt to imitate so poorly what has been directed at you.
Are we hang up defending Chee's position, or are we simply questioning your perverted hang up with Chee's source of income - when there are more important issues concerning Singapore Public Money that is not transparently accounted, while being managed by the GIC and Temasek Holding ?
In the meantime, can you show that Chee is having an active psychologist practice? -
Originally posted by Mat Toro:
Have you awaken from sleeping on your mat ?
This thread is about SDP. If you are interested in Temasek, you can always start a new thread.
In the meantime, can you show that Chee is having an active psychologist practice?
How ironical that you should suddenly realise that this thread is about SDP - and not a thread dealing with your concerns in Dr Chee Soon Juan, or his sources of income, or even about his neuropsychologist practise - which some others have been attempting to 'hint' to you ?
Is PAP only about LKY ? or GCT ? or LHL ?
Surely, SDP is more then just CSJ ?
Start a new thread if you have no guts or simply too lazy to visit SDP HQ and confront Dr Chee Soon Juan with all your perverted hang-ups. -
Chee is SDP. Chee's funding affect SDP activities.
If you do not know the source of Chee's funding just so so. There is no shame. -
Originally posted by Mat Toro:
This is only your assumption.
Chee is SDP. Chee's funding affect SDP activities.
If you do not know the source of Chee's funding just so so. There is no shame.
Chee's personal funds are his own, not SDP.
SDP's funds come from the members and Singaporeans giving their political, financial and morale support to SDP and its Secretary-General CSJ - not CSJ the Neuropsychologist.
Only you will feel not an iota of shame about things that you have no idea about BUT will pretend to make all kinds of insinuations and assumptions - as IF you know something HOT that no one else is aware.
It is not shameless to be a mental handicap, why do you fight so hard to deny accepting this fact but continue to display it so well ? -
I believe that he has been drilling into your head for the last few pages, that he does not know, but you keep pestering him for it, as if you want to drive a point home.Originally posted by Mat Toro:Chee is SDP. Chee's funding affect SDP activities.
If you do not know the source of Chee's funding just so so. There is no shame.
You know, there is no shame in being more blatant about your stated agenda, if only to let others understand what you are attempting to say in the first place. -
eh? I thot you wanted to ignore me? Why yu keep flip floppin like john kerry? are you a loser like kerry and chee?
-
I can show that you are an active idiot who cannot read. Please add neuro.Originally posted by Mat Toro:This thread is about SDP. If you are interested in Temasek, you can always start a new thread.
In the meantime, can you show that Chee is having an active psychologist practice?
For idiots who can't read, you sure top the class. -
a neuropsychologist is still a psychologist. Add neuro if you like, can you prove that Chee has an active NEUROPSYCHOLOGY practice? Where is teh source of his funding?
-
In 2002 he did mention his source of fundings. Do a search or do you want us to spoonfeed you again?Originally posted by Mat Toro:Chee is SDP. Chee's funding affect SDP activities.
If you do not know the source of Chee's funding just so so. There is no shame. -
Do a search. I found it in less than 2 minutes. Unless of course you don't know how to do that in the first place.Originally posted by Mat Toro:a neuropsychologist is still a psychologist. Add neuro if you like, can you prove that Chee has an active NEUROPSYCHOLOGY practice? Where is teh source of his funding?
Go on. I challenge you to find it. -
Infantile.Originally posted by Mat Toro:eh? I thot you wanted to ignore me? Why yu keep flip floppin like john kerry? are you a loser like kerry and chee? -
really? why hide it? why not post it here and embarass me immediately?Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:Do a search. I found it in less than 2 minutes. Unless of course you don't know how to do that in the first place.
Go on. I challenge you to find it. -
gotcha didn't i? you are super duper infantile.Originally posted by Fingolfin_Noldor:Infantile.
what university you graduate from sir? -
Cause you need to learn how to search. Come on, it's easy. Quick go do it... shoo shoo.Originally posted by Mat Toro:really? why hide it? why not post it here and embarass me immediately? -
no proof say no proof lah. dunno anything say dunno anything lah, talk so much for what liar?
Chee doesn't have an active psychologist practice at all and thats that. -
Ah that depends what period you are talking about. Come on you are not trying at all you baby...Originally posted by Mat Toro:no proof say no proof lah. dunno anything say dunno anything lah, talk so much for what liar?
Chee doesn't have an active psychologist practice at all and thats that.
Come on. I'm sure you can do it... big boss.
-
You know, I don't really care about flip flopping.Originally posted by Mat Toro:gotcha didn't i? you are super duper infantile.
what university you graduate from sir?
Only a Repulitard like yourself actually cares.
Carry on with your infantile baiting.
And yes, when am I going to get those polls you claimed to have performed?