Discussions
-
I've noticed that we have allowed Mat Toro to distract us away from proper discussions. More often than not in the past, both camps namely the "proposition" and the "opposition" has brought up valid points.
However as we can see from some of the topics that Mat Toro has contributed to, namely,
Mr Lee's broken promises.
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270794&page=0
Singapore: A land of plenty but...
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270591&page=1
And even more outrageously, robustly questioning contributors and tried to engaged them in a war of words on a subject and incident he has no knowledge of.
PAP cause Mr Brown...
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270595&page=2
I suggest that everyone just take his oneliner "rebuttals'' with a pinch of salt. -
Well, we should ALL make it a point to simply ignore any "inputs" from him then...
and I find he sounds VERY much like OM... may very well be OM! -
What is OM?
-
Not least that moron hasn't come in much. Unless it is OM and he took a different tack after getting smashed again and again.Originally posted by HyperFocal:Well, we should ALL make it a point to simply ignore any "inputs" from him then...
and I find he sounds VERY much like OM... may very well be OM! -
It isn't just that he makes accusations after another.Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:I've noticed that we have allowed Mat Toro to distract us away from proper discussions. More often than not in the past, both camps namely the "proposition" and the "opposition" has brought up valid points.
However as we can see from some of the topics that Mat Toro has contributed to, namely,
Mr Lee's broken promises.
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270794&page=0
Singapore: A land of plenty but...
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270591&page=1
And even more outrageously, robustly questioning contributors and tried to engaged them in a war of words on a subject and incident he has no knowledge of.
PAP cause Mr Brown...
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270595&page=2
I suggest that everyone just take his oneliner "rebuttals'' with a pinch of salt.
He doesn't even know how to analyse evidence objectively and thus far hasn't shown a hint of critical thinking. Not least his bloody habit of cherry picking which has gotten hopeless blatant, and also, he has a gross lack of understanding of economic issues and treats almost just about anything simplistically.
Ridiculous. -
His only retort is to ask people to provide proofs... use it back on him. It's fun especially when you know he can't.Originally posted by Fingolfin_Noldor:It isn't just that he makes accusations after another.
He doesn't even know how to analyse evidence objectively and thus far hasn't shown a hint of critical thinking. Not least his bloody habit of cherry picking which has gotten hopeless blatant, and also, he has a gross lack of understanding of economic issues and treats almost just about anything simplistically.
Ridiculous. -
If I am not wrong - OM = oxymoron = person with low IQ.Originally posted by selfobliged:What is OM? -
Ya, what is OM?
-
OM = Oxford Mushroom -
Oh I have, he has always pretended I never asked.Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:His only retort is to ask people to provide proofs... use it back on him. It's fun especially when you know he can't.
-
any problem shd pm the mod why start this kind of thread.
-
Hehehe.....
A consensual discussion amongst peers is met with protest from a simian.
Think they trying to discuss amongst themselves how Mat Toro throws the discussion off track with his stupid one liners. And what solutions there are to the current predicament.
Mods don't necessary call to action what is necessarily needed to resolve the issue.
I can't deny there are quite afew low level intelligent beings which throws the discussions of Speaker's Corner off track with their illogical one liners.
If you have an issue which you think the opposition forumnites are wrong and you have a better perspective of the issue.
Show us the money!!!
No point sneaking in one liners to affect the emotions of forumnites, detract and sabotage the topic, one liners which cannot be substantiated with facts. -
Ya, agreed. Though I am quite new here, I find it irritating too when reading through the discussions.
-
I think this is a stupid thread only fit for whiners
-
If minister Lui Tuck Yew really sent such counter cyber-insurgency agents like mad terror here to post against or confuse good and productive views of people on government policies with one-liner claims of success or cover-up existing problems with bold assertions without substance it will reflect on his own ministerial lack of talent or substance.Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:I've noticed that we have allowed Mat Toro to distract us away from proper discussions. More often than not in the past, both camps namely the "proposition" and the "opposition" has brought up valid points.
However as we can see from some of the topics that Mat Toro has contributed to, namely,
Mr Lee's broken promises.
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270794&page=0
Singapore: A land of plenty but...
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270591&page=1
And even more outrageously, robustly questioning contributors and tried to engaged them in a war of words on a subject and incident he has no knowledge of.
PAP cause Mr Brown...
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=270595&page=2
I suggest that everyone just take his oneliner "rebuttals'' with a pinch of salt.
So it does not matter if another mad terror is sent to madly terrorise or salmanize our posts. (Read past posts of salman by doing a search and all could see how he finally did a shameful retreat from all his uncalled for salmanisations) -
Point noted. Welcome to this stupid thread and contributing to it.Originally posted by Gazelle:I think this is a stupid thread only fit for whiners -
It's hard to take seriously the judgement on whatever is "stupid" or "whining" from somebody who thinks the sniffing other people's underwear is justified and desirable.
-
Oh my god! Who can be so perverted and so dumb to tell others about it? Surely such a dumb person does not exist in this world? Only animals will do that!Originally posted by SingaporeTyrannosaur:It's hard to take seriously the judgement of whatever is "stupid" or is a "whiner" of somebody who thinks sniffing other people's underwear is justified and desirable. -
Ask Gazelle lor...Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:Oh my god! Who can be so perverted and so dumb to tell others about it? Surely such a dumb person does not exist in this world? Only animals will do that! -
If it's for whiners.Originally posted by Gazelle:I think this is a stupid thread only fit for whiners
Why are you here?
Aren't you by your own volition admitting that you are a whiner too.
-
Do you specifically mean dogs???Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:Oh my god! Who can be so perverted and so dumb to tell others about it? Surely such a dumb person does not exist in this world? Only animals will do that! -
All in all, I would urge all to totally ignore Mat. Pretend that he never even posted until the day he start answering questions and backing them up with facts.
He is now nothing but a fake wannabe "big boss" who accuses others of fabricating evidences but yet unable to produce evidences. His general knowledge is also seriously lacking.
Again, let's all just ignore him. Totally. -
I think soon enough this Forum is gonna become a Conspiracy forum.. its good discussing about things , point of views and personal thoughts and experiences , but assuming, is another thing. -
It is interesting to engage him only when you have the time.
The surprise is when you make a detailed effort to address every single point he make, and fire it off with a remark about the MIW, he will avoid making any reference to that point but will head off with another question in another direction.
He surely is making some effort to wear any keen discussion down. -
Agreed, he has avoided numerous points brought up...Originally posted by Atobe:It is interesting to engage him only when you have the time.
The surprise is when you make a detailed effort to address every single point he make, and fire it off with a remark about the MIW, he will avoid making any reference to that point but will head off with another question in another direction.
He surely is making some effort to wear any keen discussion down.