sad state of the american judiciary
-
we need something similar to "racial hygeine".Originally posted by unclebutcher:lech walesa
adolf hitler
mao tsetung
felicien kabuga
The wiping out of anything that is impure by moral standards. -
Originally posted by unclebutcher:
When i say criminals,i meant HARDCORE.
genocide of [b] all criminals?[/b]
Not theives.. -
You are nothing but a senseless idiot.Originally posted by boka:we need something similar to "racial hygeine".
The wiping out of anything that is impure by moral standards. -
i shall not talk to you anymore, hitler-wannabe.Originally posted by boka:we need something similar to "racial hygeine".
The wiping out of anything that is impure by moral standards. -
judging from ruthless acts of criminals,i have more than enough sense and logic to inculate justification into my mentality unlike u.Originally posted by LazerLordz:You are nothing but a senseless idiot.
U name call too much MR NOTATIONAL SPEAKER. -
If anything, you're the one who's confused.Originally posted by sgdiehard:Rogue governments are back by the jurisdiciary system, their Constitution, and the votes of the majority, whether they were conned forced or otherwise. What are the backing of organised crime syndicates?
The existence of rogue governments do not justify organised crime in anyway. By getting rid of crime syndicates a rogue government has become a good government. A crime syndicate got rid of a rogue government, it remains a crime syndicate and the government they replaced become a rogue and criminal government.
don't get mix up.
I didn't say rogue governments justify organised crime - I'm saying rogue governments are the worst organised criminals on earth. Can you understand that simple argument in its entirety?
So what's more dangerous? A bunch of ordinary organised criminals who conduct their illicit activities in the dark to avoid detection or organised criminals who conduct their activities in the open with the full backing of the Constitution? If you need any evidence, 200, 000 people are imprisoned or detained in labour camps across North Korea. -
Whatever. You place too much investment in your emotions in the context of a web forum.Originally posted by boka:judging from ruthless acts of criminals,i have more than enough sense and logic to inculate justification into my mentality unlike u.
U name call too much MR NOTATIONAL SPEAKER.
Go get a dosage of reality. -
That's what happens when you've got mugs who are so inadequately exposed to the workings of the real criminals that they can't seem to make light of whatever they haven't been fed with from this beloved media of theirs...Originally posted by Fingolfin_Noldor:What the heck are you talking about? How does a rogue govt get rid of crime syndicates and become a good one? The N. Korean Govt is essentially a massive crime syndicate! How do you get rid of a crime syndicate which is also a Govt?
-
You are much closer to being a member of an asylum than you're to becoming a law enforcer with an international organisation...Originally posted by boka:Your idealogy will never work.
The day i can i become a law enforcer with the international organisation will be the day where i wil gun down criminals for self validation of my personal code and as well as trophies. -
For all the noble talk about meting out justice to organised crime (nevermind if it can even be practically enforced), these folks have still to address the issue of tackling organised crime that comes in the form of governments.Originally posted by googoomuck:I agree with you in such cases.
Drug lords and human traffickers or slave traders are indeed special criminals that need to be dealt with diffiferently. They are ruthless.
They work as a syndicate. Druglords in Myanmar even have private armies to protect the lucrative business.
So yes, if you want to fight these criminals, you need to get involve with international organizations that deal with such crime syndicates.
How can any druglord, arm smugglers or human traffickers working as an independent entity in the form of syndicates ever come close to beating the state-organised tyrants which have the added effect of being safeguarded by their respective constitutions? North Korea may be the most culpable government of such activities, but they sure aren't the only rogue government on the planet.
Are you convinced independent organised crime syndicates actually wreck more havoc than organised criminals that come in the form of governments? -
Is that the best u can come up with?Originally posted by LazerLordz:Whatever. You place too much investment in your emotions in the context of a web forum.
Go get a dosage of reality.
I though u were doing some research on the justice system...what a dissapointment. -
Me? You're taking the Internet too seriously.Originally posted by boka:Is that the best u can come up with?
I though u were doing some research on the justice system...what a dissapointment.
Here's some salt ya. -
alright time to step out of the closet.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Me? You're taking the Internet too seriously.
Here's some salt ya.
Next time u debate,at least provide yourself with some substaintial material or a firm stand instead of name callings. -
Originally posted by walesa:
North Korea is a dictatorship, got back up of Constitution meh?
If anything, you're the one who's confused.
I didn't say rogue governments justify organised crime - I'm saying [b]rogue governments are the worst organised criminals on earth. Can you understand that simple argument in its entirety?
So what's more dangerous? A bunch of ordinary organised criminals who conduct their illicit activities in the dark to avoid detection or organised criminals who conduct their activities in the open with the full backing of the Constitution? If you need any evidence, 200, 000 people are imprisoned or detained in labour camps across North Korea.
[/b] but i agree that north korea is the largest organised criminal organisation, but not the worse. Drug syndicates are the worse. -
Wah, wu niah bo? Debate or not you say one har?Originally posted by boka:alright time to step out of the closet.
Next time u debate,at least provide yourself with some substaintial material or a firm stand instead of name callings.
I'll decide if I want to debate, or not. The same goes for every individual here. They make the choice to participate in a debate or not.
It's not sweet to waltz around and presume that everyone wants to be in a debate with you when they choose to pass a few comments on your arguments.
Remember, this is not your home. It's a public marketplace of ideas.
Mai kei kiang ah..
-
For tyrants, itÂ’s a different ball game.Originally posted by walesa:For all the noble talk about meting out justice to organised crime (nevermind if it can even be practically enforced), these folks have still to address the issue of tackling organised crime that comes in the form of governments.
How can any druglord, arm smugglers or human traffickers working as an independent entity in the form of syndicates ever come close to beating the state-organised tyrants which have the added effect of being safeguarded by their respective constitutions? North Korea may be the most culpable government of such activities, but they sure aren't the only rogue government on the planet.
Are you convinced independent organised crime syndicates actually wreck more havoc than organised criminals that come in the form of governments?
Tyrants are much too powerful to be put to justice. A people power or a whole army or both are needed to overthrow them and to help install a new government. -
What planet are you from? I see this regime's propaganda mouthpieces have fed you well indeed - at least, good enough for your intelligence.Originally posted by sgdiehard:North Korea is a dictatorship, got back up of Constitution meh? but i agree that north korea is the largest organised criminal organisation, but not the worse. Drug syndicates are the worse. 
-
Whether they can be put to justice or not is another matter. But since some gnomes have been talking about some utopian brand of justice, it's remarkably foolhardy they can't seem to comprehend rogue governments are far more dangerous - and by extension, more pernicious to humanity - than any other independent organised crime syndicates on earth.Originally posted by googoomuck:For tyrants, itÂ’s a different ball game.
Tyrants are much too powerful to be put to justice. A people power or a whole army or both are needed to overthrow them and to help install a new government. -
some ppl think everybody must conform to their way of thinking(read:genocideOriginally posted by walesa:Whether they can be put to justice or not is another matter. But since some gnomes have been talking about some utopian brand of justice, it's remarkably foolhardy they can't seem to comprehend rogue governments are far more dangerous - and by extension, more pernicious to humanity - than any other independent organised crime syndicates on earth.
) or else their just low level creatures -
Are you an idiot? Do you understand the phrase "I am the Law"? Is the Constitution not the Highest Law of the Land? Is Kim Jong Il not the master of the nation, and thus the "Law"? Is he not the "Constitution"?Originally posted by sgdiehard:North Korea is a dictatorship, got back up of Constitution meh? but i agree that north korea is the largest organised criminal organisation, but not the worse. Drug syndicates are the worse.
If your pathetic brain cannot comprehend what I just wrote, then go to the corner and stop spouting nonsense. Your ignorance is more a threat to the human race than these thugs. -
If barbaric human beings have no compassion for other beings,then they are lower than animals in my eyes and in the eyes of the world.Originally posted by unclebutcher:some ppl think everybody must conform to their way of thinking(read:genocide ) or else their just low level creatures
Like some have pointed out,syndicates manipulate and enslaves human beings through controlling them by drugs,depriving them of food and even to the point of HOUSING THEM IN SLAVE PENS.
What on earth is compassionate inject another being with drugs and control them?
What on earth slap a debt bondage for their personal gains?
These are not humans.
Personally i admit that apart from the personal code i adhere to,i have an inate desire of seeking higher challenge and what else other than criminals can i gun down to self validate and their heads for trohpies?
Personal fulfillment for me.
It doesn't matter if u can change these syndicates or not,most likely u wun be able to because these people are ruthless and has to empathy for the lives of others but even if u do,can u reverse the pain and psychological suffering that will scar these peopl for life?
Look it's a life gone!
How will u feel if u are inflicted with HIV or other STD at the young age of <20 because u were forced against your will by these brutual beings?
We all grew up in safety and so comfortably and for me,i know everyone in any nation can live safely and have a childhood but i know this image is repeatly being tarnished by heartless synidicate who would not think twice of using an innocent human being to fulfill their needs.
Hilter was a noble person who had the right vision of leading his people out of misery but slowly he went down the wrong path of being an xtremist for the wrong reasons.
I'm an extremist but i never doubt my intend was wrong.
If anyone tells me Subjecting such cold blooded criminals to the harshest form of punishment then these people must be suffering from a similar chronic syndrome close to stockholm syndrome and in any case anyone does,they,to me are in league with the criminals.
One particaly area that i felt was undermining the effort of NGO to save people from brothel is because police are too fearful.
They seek the mastermind behind the running of these brothels but hardly can they find these master syndicates.
If u ask me,i would gun down every of the henchmen ordered to run the brothels for their master and i'm just gonna see how much more hencmen they are they going to send before they emerge from their bunny holes.
If u can't get someone,make them come after u.