National Day Rally 2007.
-
Gazelle,
PM Lee did mention "More than half the active members will get 1% more on all their balances", I take it that this means that either, more than half will get 1% return on their balances (i.e. only those that have less than $60,000 will get 1% return). It did not mention anything about those with above $60,000 getting any 1% return. Maybe you can shed more light on it.
But when I calculated the figures for those balances below $60,000, there were less than half (34.87%) about 524,353 members out of a total of 1,461,949. -
Originally posted by Gazelle: 20 August 2007 03.44 PM
What have you got to say with the kind of low-down things that you indulge in ?
At least M13 has the balls to take up the challenge....As for you?? I have got nothing to say
Then again, I will give you the opportunity to respond, since your post must have crossed mine being posted 2 minutes earlier. -
he said those with above $60K, you should be able to take care of urselvesOriginally posted by maurizio13:Gazelle,
PM Lee did mention "More than half the active members will get 1% more on all their balances", I take it that this means that either, more than half will get 1% return on their balances (i.e. only those that have less than $60,000 will get 1% return). It did not mention anything about those with above $60,000 getting any 1% return. Maybe you can shed more light on it.
But when I calculated the figures for those balances below $60,000, there were less than half (34.87%) about 524,353 members out of a total of 1,461,949.
-
Atobe, this discussion is too complicated for your sheep brain and it is too time consuming to teach Sheep to perform tricks.Originally posted by Atobe:While the number of people with a CPF balance of $60,000 and above will total 937,596 is correct - did you make an error is assuming the cost to the Government in the 1% extra payment being made ?
If one is to add the balance of all the totals for these 937,593 persons it will amount to $201,945,361,000 in which the 1% is to be paid.
Unless LHL is capping payment of 1% only up to $60,000 and no more, which leads to your ''ball-park number'' of $56,225,760,000 - then somehow the cost of $700 Million just do not add up.
Yet again, your expertise with the low-down come into play, should we continue to give you any doubt to your credibility in this area of your interest ?
Is your arse any worth, with all the diarrhea that you claimed to be having ?
Will you have much of an arse left for anyone even a Doctor to appreciate, leaving the gays aside ? -
From that I guess he meant, those whose balances are above $60K, there will be no extra 1% interest for you.Originally posted by de_middle:he said those with above $60K, you should be able to take care of urselves
From what it seems now, it's a LPPL strategy to help the poor. How can such a scheme lessen the income gap and help the poor. The rich also gets a share of the 1% interest.
Crap!!!
It's like giving out candy to the poor to make them happy and not telling the poor that he is also giving out candy to the rich too. -
The PM in the recent NDay Rally has emphasised that social cohesion has to be strengthened among races... However, I feel, personally as an Indian myself, alienated from the community. First of all, the prime minister did his speech in three languages. Is it not that Tamil is part of the 4 official languages of Singapore? From reliable sources, I gather that President Nathan learns mandrain on top of knowing the three other official languages. In that case, why is it that the PM cannot give the speech in tamil?
Then, there the Malay and Chinese special programmes. And the suggestion of a Bahasa Indonesia. How come there is no Tamil special programme? I'm sure there are many non-indians who would want to learn Tamil as their third language.
What do you think? -
M13, I just hope you remember the deal we had and this picture will serve as a reminder.Originally posted by maurizio13:Gazelle,
PM Lee did mention "More than half the active members will get 1% more on all their balances", I take it that this means that either, more than half will get 1% return on their balances (i.e. only those that have less than $60,000 will get 1% return). It did not mention anything about those with above $60,000 getting any 1% return. Maybe you can shed more light on it.
But when I calculated the figures for those balances below $60,000, there were less than half (34.87%) about 524,353 members out of a total of 1,461,949.
-
Originally posted by Gazelle:
With the kind of ability that you have, do you even know how to differentiate the sheep from the ewes that you are only interested to sniff ?
Atobe, this discussion is too complicated for your sheep brain and it is too time consuming to teach Sheep to perform tricks.
If you simply do not have the ability to define the limited parameters of your understanding, at least be honest to admit it, why go around with big numbers ?
To afraid to play poker with an empty ''credibility account'', or has your credit worthiness hit so low that you must begin to sniff at others ? -
Talk to the HAND, they are listening...Originally posted by Atobe:With the kind of ability that you have, do you even know how to differentiate the sheep from the ewes that you are only interested to sniff ?
If you simply do not have the ability to define the limited parameters of your understanding, at least be honest to admit it, why go around with big numbers ?
To afraid to play poker with an empty ''credibility account'', or has your credit worthiness hit so low that you must begin to sniff at others ? -
I suggest you read the deal again and see what was agree on.
It stated specifically to prove PM's figure of $700 million.
Have you prove $700 million???
You just got lucky today.
Maybe you can prove my other calculations too.
I agree that I made a mistake in the calculation by assuming that the 1% was to only help the poor, because the PM made it out to be that way. Little did I know that the rich whose balances are above $60,000 will also benefit from the scheme.
Which is more a less a LPPL scheme, like all the other schemes they have. -
Originally posted by Gazelle:
If you cannot manage to sniff out the $700 MILLION - go ahead and sniff your HAND, we will know where YOUR HANDS have been....
Talk to the HAND, they are listening...
If you happen to lick your HANDS - we will understand the preferred positions you are taking. -
M13, you are a pure breed loser!! Period!!Originally posted by maurizio13:I suggest you read the deal again and see what was agree on.
It stated specifically to prove PM's figure of $700 million.
Have you prove $700 million???
You just got lucky today.
Maybe you can prove my other calculations too.
I agree that I made a mistake in the calculation by assuming that the 1% was to only help the poor, because the PM made it out to be that way. Little did I know that the rich whose balances are above $60,000 will also benefit from the scheme.
Which is more a less an LPPL scheme, like all the other schemes they have. -
What if I can proof to you that it will cost the government MORE than $700m per year, are you willing to take up the Gazelle challange?Originally posted by Atobe:If you cannot manage to sniff out the $700 MILLION - go ahead and sniff your HAND, we will know where YOUR HANDS.
If you happen to lick your HANDS - we will understand the preferred positions you are in.
I hope after all that big talk, I hope you also have big BALLS to go with it -
omg....another battle field
-
This was posted on 20 August 2007 03.42 PM on Page 7 of this thread, and still waiting for the superb sniffing ability of a Gazelle to unravel what the leader of his Gazeele herd is saying.
Originally posted by Gazelle:
The S$60,000 cap is the maximum amount you can enjoy the 1% increase in CPF rate. ie. if you have $120,000 in your CPF, only $60,000 will enjoy the 1%.
If you refer back to CPF statistic on page 84, total number of people will $60,000 and above is 937,596, which mean, S$56,225,760,000 of CPF from this group will benefit from the 1% hike, which will cost the government $562,225,760
As for those below $60,000 group their total CPF value is S$12,015,540,000, of which 100% will benefit from the 1% interest hike and will cost the government = $120,014,540.
Total Cost : $562,225,820 + $120,014,540 = $682,713,040
Go easy on the arse, because I just had diarrhea this morning...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the number of people with a CPF balance of $60,000 and above will total 937,596 is correct - did you make an error is assuming the cost to the Government in the 1% extra payment being made ?
If one is to add the balance of all the totals for these 937,596 persons it will amount to $201,945,361,000 in which the 1% is to be paid.
Unless LHL is capping payment of 1% only up to $60,000 and no more, which leads to your ''ball-park number'' of $56,225,760,000 - then somehow the cost of $700 Million just do not add up.
Yet again, your expertise with the low-down come into play, should we continue to give you any doubt to your credibility in this area of your interest ?
Is your arse any worth, with all the diarrhea that you claimed to be having ?
Will you have much of an arse left for anyone even a Doctor to appreciate, leaving the gays aside ? -
ATOBE, stop talking coc.k lah....I am challenging you, do you have the BALLS to take to the gazelle challenge if I can proof to you that the 1% hike in CPF interest rate willl cost the govenment more than S$700m per year.Originally posted by Atobe:[color=darkred]This was posted on 20 August 2007 03.42 PM on Page 7 of this thread, and still waiting for the superb sniffing ability of a Gazelle to unravel what the leader of his Gazeele herd is saying.
If you have no balls to stand by what you said, just shu.t the fcuk up and go find yourself a skirt to wear. -
Originally posted by Gazelle: 20 August 2007 05.01 PM
Are you so desparate to protect yourself, or trying so hard to floor my position after having got yourself kicked several times over ?
What if I can proof to you that it will cost the government MORE than $700m per year, are you willing to take up the Gazelle challange?
I hope after all that big talk, I hope you also have big BALLS to go with it
Is the debate about the Government paying MORE than $700m per year, or is the debate about the accuracy of the $700m that LHL claimed that he is paying ?
What is the ACTUAL AMOUNT that LHL claim in his speech ?
Your mathematics skills is as bad as your reading and comprehension skills... is it due to too much sniffing at others ?
Bad habit kills... surely you should know. -
My post was made at 03.42 PM, and it take you more than one over hour to put this challenge ?Originally posted by Gazelle:ATOBE, stop talking coc.k lah....I am challenging you, do you have the BALLS to take to the gazelle challenge if I can proof to you that the 1% hike in CPF interest rate willl cost the govenment more than S$700m per year.
If you have no balls to stand by what you said, just shu.t the fcuk up and go find yourself a skirt to wear.
At least respond to an original challenge and not create a new challenge that DO NOT even address the original challenge even at a tangent.
Too much creative sniffing will not get you anywhere. -
Atobe, I are you willing to take up the gazelle challenge if I can proof to you that it will add up to more than $700m per year?Originally posted by Atobe:While the number of people with a CPF balance of $60,000 and above will total 937,596 is correct - did you make an error is assuming the cost to the Government in the 1% extra payment being made ?
If one is to add the balance of all the totals for these 937,596 persons it will amount to $201,945,361,000 in which the 1% is to be paid.
Unless LHL is capping payment of 1% only up to $60,000 and no more, which leads to your ''ball-park number'' of $56,225,760,000 - then somehow the cost of $700 Million just do not add up.
Yet again, your expertise with the low-down come into play, should we continue to give you any doubt to your credibility in this area of your interest ?
Is your arse any worth, with all the diarrhea that you claimed to be having ?
Will you have much of an arse left for anyone even a Doctor to appreciate, leaving the gays aside ? -
I was getting my hairy skunk arse lick by M13, and I have no time to reply to your post.Originally posted by Atobe:My post was made at 03.42 PM, and it take you more than one over hour to put this challenge ?
At least respond to an original challenge and not create a new challenge that DO NOT even address the original challenge even at a tangent.
Too much creative sniffing will not get you anywhere.
And btw, are you so dumb and childish to believe that everybody is here 24.7?
what a jerk!! -
this is stupid
-
Eh??Originally posted by Gazelle:I was getting my hairy skunk arse lick by M13, and I have no time to reply to your post.
And btw, are you so dumb and childish to believe that everybody is here 24.7?
what a jerk!!
I don't suppose you have won. You failed to prove $700 million as specified by me. But I prefer you lick your own ass like I so stated in the agreement.
You so desperate to claim a victory over me? -
The fact of the matter that you apologise is already a proof that you have admitted your mistake.Originally posted by maurizio13:Eh??
I don't suppose you have won. You failed to prove $700 million as specified by me. But I prefer you lick your own ass like I so stated in the agreement.
You so desperate to claim a victory over me?
M13, are you willing to take up another challenge if I can proof to you that it will cost the government MORE THAN $700m for this 1% CPF interest hike??
I promise there will be no more hairy arse this time....hahahahaa -
Originally posted by maurizio13:You must prove that the PM's figure of $700 million.
Deal!!!
If you lose, you shall do those exact same things, but to yourself.
The thing is do you have the brains and the balls to take up your own challenge.
So, did you actually prove $700 million?Originally posted by Gazelle:The S$60,000 cap is the maximum amount you can enjoy the 1% increase in CPF rate. ie. if you have $120,000 in your CPF, only $60,000 will enjoy the 1%.
If you refer back to CPF statistic on page 84, total number of people will $60,000 and above is 937,596, which mean, S$56,225,760,000 of CPF from this group will benefit from the 1% hike, which will cost the government $562,225,760
As for those below $60,000 group their total CPF value is S$12,015,540,000, of which 100% will benefit from the 1% interest hike and will cost the government = $120,014,540.
Total Cost : $562,225,820 + $120,014,540 = $682,713,040
Go easy on the arse, because I just had diarrhea this morning...
Do you not understand "MUST prove that the PM's figure of $700 million"?
Did you lose or did I lose?
There is no need for you to lick my arse, you better stick to self licking your own arse.
You must have admired me alot, else you won't be wanting to so desperately claim victory when there was none. I made a mistake does not necessarily mean you won, because you still failed to prove $700 million.
Even if you THINK you won, winning a battle does not equate to winning a war. I suggest you dig up all my post and prove everyone of them was wrong.
If you can prove every piece of post is wrong, then I won't post here anymore. -
Originally posted by maurizio13:So, did you actually prove $700 million?
Do you not understand "MUST prove that the PM's figure of $700 million"?
Did you lose or did I lose?
There is no need for you to lick my arse, you better stick to self licking your own arse.
You must have admired me alot, else you won't be wanting to so desperately claim victory when there was none. I made a mistake does not necessarily mean you won, because you still failed to prove $700 million.
Even if you THINK you won, winning a battle does not equate to winning a war. I suggest you dig up all my post and prove everyone of them was wrong.
If you can prove every piece of post is wrong, then I won't post here anymore.