OMFG!!!!Originally posted by Gazelle:If I can proof you wrong, (ie. Singapore reserves are not ALL in US$) are you willing to take a gazelle challenge? ie. to kiss my hairy deer arse and call yourself a stupid piece of sheep?
Or are you going to hide under the skirt again?

Originally posted by Gazelle: 14 August 2007 12.33 PMDo you know how to read what m13 has written ?
Atobe, do you agree that US$138b Singapore reserves are all in US$?
Originally posted by Gazelle: 14 August 2007 12.32 PM [/b]Do you even know where you are heading with your argument after going one whole circle ?
I think only dumb people will expect a government to disclose the details of the foreign currency reserve.
The reason why it is 1.51 is because, everything, except the US$ reserves will be converted to S$ value before converting to US$.
[/b]
Originally posted by maurizio13: 14 August 2007 11.27 AM
If it's in other currencies, they would have put GBP, JPY, DEM, AUD and EUR, instead they chose to only put USD under the constituent of "Gold and Foreign Exchange".
Moreover if it's in other currencies, the division of the numbers SGD 208,202.1 / USD 137,735.7 would not have given you USD 1 = SGD 1.51, due to the bid-ask spread when you convert from other currencies to USD.![]()
Originally posted by Gazelle: 13 August 2007 - 11.03 PMIs it not your own dumbness to interprete m13's post in the manner of your OWN understanding of what he has written ?
obviously M13 is so dumb to understand that when you say US Dollar Reserve, that mean that everything is in US$. However when you say that Singapore Reserve stood at US$138b, it means that it is the equivalent of US$138b and it can consist of multiple currencies and gold which are not peg to the US$.
Thats how M13 will chicken out and hide under the skirt.Originally posted by maurizio13:OMFG!!!!
Not another lame Gazelle challenge!!!!
Wahahaha!!!!!!
You have a hairy deer's arse???
ROTFLMAO!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Atobe, let cut the long story short as I have got better things to do than to read all you BS and panties sniffing story, because such childish act are means for people wearing skirts not man.Originally posted by Atobe:Is it not your own dumbness to interprete m13's post in the manner of your OWN understanding of what he has written ?
Shoule we believe your clever interpretation of what m13 intend to mean by your own opinion that ''gold is not peg to the US$'', or what did you actually intend to mean ?
Originally posted by Gazelle:Are you going to ask Atobe to take the Gazelle challenge too?
Atobe, let cut the long story short as I have got better things to do than to read all you BS and panties sniffing story, because such childish act are means for people wearing skirts not man.
Do you agree with M13 statement
"Our [b]US$ reserves held by MAS stood at US$ 138 billion as on March 2007. FYI, US is one of Singapore's major trading partners, what better currency to hold than US$. ""
[/b]
Originally posted by Gazelle:Yes, only you will be able to sniff out the differences in how those who wear skirts will behave.
Atobe, let cut the long story short as I have got better things to do than to read all you BS and panties sniffing story, because such childish act are means for people wearing skirts not man.
Do you agree with M13 statement
"Our [b]US$ reserves held by MAS stood at US$ 138 billion as on March 2007. FYI, US is one of Singapore's major trading partners, what better currency to hold than US$. ""
[/b]
Originally posted by maurizio13:Nah...girl dont usually have the balls to take such a challenge.
[b]Are you going to ask Atobe to take the Gazelle challenge too?
Just reply to the above US Treasury department statistics and stop diverting attention away from the topic.![]()
![]()
![]()
[/b]
Atobe, simple question requires simple reply such as Yes or No, and why yes and why no.Originally posted by Atobe:Yes, only you will be able to sniff out the differences in how those who wear skirts will behave.
However, are you sure you know what makes a MAN after all your boastful sniffing accomplishments and infatuations with what lies beneath the skirt ?
Should we need to wonder your constant fantasies with everything to do beneath the skirt - always accusing others about hiding behind the skirts ?
My comments have been clearly stated in explaining m13 statements to you, and it seems you have no interest to read clearly and carefully.
Is it so difficult to read ?
If you have no ability to read and comprehend what is written then do not attempt to be arrogant and insist on your point of views - and call others names that only you will be interested to sniff at.
Originally posted by Gazelle:Do you appreciate bandwidth after all the many SHEEP and BIRDS photos that you have posted ?
Atobe, simple question requires simple reply such as Yes or No, and why yes and why no.
Cut all the BS story lah, you are just wasting bandwidth here.
Dude!Originally posted by Gazelle:Nah...girl dont usually have the balls to take such a challenge.
US Treasure Statictic, reflect US$159b, my question to you is that our total reserves stood at US$138b which consist of Gold and deposit and foreign currency, can you explain how much of the US$159b reflected in your statistic belongs to the Singapore reserves?
Just another way of sayin, OK Doki, I am going to hide under the skirt now...Originally posted by maurizio13:Dude!
If I have the authority to know the exact composition, I will be sitting in the MAS Chairman's chair and making afew millions every year.
Due to the difference in year end and the assets that are included in the calculation, the make up will be slightly different.
Ermm....
Is that the best response you can muster up?![]()
![]()
Oki doki, I am going to bed.
Good night.
***Atobe is diverting discussion to bandwidth***Originally posted by Atobe:Do you appreciate bandwidth after all the many SHEEP and BIRDS photos that you have posted ?
I am surprised that you have even begun to appreciate bandwidth - is this the reason for the sudden absence of the BIRDS and the SHEEP over last 30 or more hours ?
If you are interested in bandwith, then take the simpler route and try to understand what has been written, otherwise admit that you need help in comprehension.
Are you saving bandwidth with another useless response that again display your infatuation with the skirt ?Originally posted by Gazelle:
Quote: Original post by maurizio13:
Dude!
If I have the authority to know the exact composition, I will be sitting in the MAS Chairman's chair and making afew millions every year.
Due to the difference in year end and the assets that are included in the calculation, the make up will be slightly different.
Ermm....
Is that the best response you can muster up?![]()
![]()
Oki doki, I am going to bed.
Good night.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just another way of sayin, OK Doki, I am going to hide under the skirt now...
whats new!!
BIG TALK, NO SUBSTANCE!!
You could have been more honest with yourself if you know even how to be an honest kid by claiming yourself as the First in line in starting this bandwidth discussion in your earlier post quoted below:-Originally posted by Gazelle: 14 August 2007 02.14 PM
Originally posted by Atobe:
Do you appreciate bandwidth after all the many SHEEP and BIRDS photos that you have posted ?
I am surprised that you have even begun to appreciate bandwidth - is this the reason for the sudden absence of the BIRDS and the SHEEP over last 30 or more hours ?
If you are interested in bandwith, then take the simpler route and try to understand what has been written, otherwise admit that you need help in comprehension.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***Atobe is diverting discussion to bandwidth***
Originally posted by Gazelle: 14 August 2007 - 02.00 PMAtobe, simple question requires simple reply such as Yes or No, and why yes and why no.
Cut all the BS story lah, you are just wasting bandwidth here.
Can you not discern from what I have written to explain m13's position to you ?Originally posted by Gazelle:Atobe
Do you agree with M13 statement of
"Our US$ reserves held by MAS stood at US$ 138 billion as on March 2007. FYI, US is one of Singapore's major trading partners, what better currency to hold than US$. ""
1) I am asking you a question, not asking if M13 arse smell like a sheep.Originally posted by Atobe:Can you not discern from what I have written to explain m13's position to you ?
Are you disputing my explanation too ?
would you like to help to comment on the above statement?Originally posted by ^tamago^:same tactic as Mat Toro. WOB.![]()
Originally posted by Gazelle:Will I dare to challenge your expertise in sniffing out how anybody's arse will smell like a sheep ?
1) I am asking you a question, not asking if M13 arse smell like a sheep.
You not only cannot read, but you seem to have problem in comprehension.
2) Can you please explain what nonsense are you talking about and in relationship to which statement?
""If EVERYTHING is converted to US$ and lumping it back into the US$ Reserves - should we not take it at the face value of what your favorite Government has done by using the US$ as the common comparative denominator for all nations as recognised by the IMF ?""
Atobe,Originally posted by Atobe:You not only cannot read, but you seem to have problem in comprehension.
If you cannot even understand the basic structure of sentences, how can you possibly hope to cope with the structure of how Reserves are formed and calculated ?
Originally posted by Gazelle:Am I the one doing the sniffing and smelling, or did everyone in this Sg Forum defer to your claims of being THE Expert Sniffer ?
Atobe,
There is no need to compare understanding what BS you write to understanding how reserves are formed and calculated because all you know is about smelling your fellowSHEEP arse. (while M13 is sleeping I hope)
You are slowly getting it right, but if only you care to read more in detail instead of asking to be spoonfed.
Can you then tell us why ou make that statement and in response to which statement in this thread?
It has been proven many times that this ATOBE is only good at BIG TALK because he doesnt really know what he is talking about other than smelling sheep arse, and in return he will try to play poker by threatening you with further BIG TALK.Originally posted by Atobe:You are slowly getting it right, but if only you care to read more in detail instead of asking to be spoonfed.
m13 had already mentioned the basics of the whole scheme, but it is your own preferred indulgence in always attempting to show-off your superior knowledge above everyon; and which lead you into a rush that pushed you to put your foot into hole that you did not take the trouble to sniff carefully first.
Try sniffing more diligently to what has been written and it will dawn on you the full text of what m13 had written.
The 'panties' must have been locked in your own mind, as no where in 'all my writings' have I mentioned the word 'panty or panties' being associated with the word ''sniffing''.Originally posted by Gazelle:
Originally posted by Atobe:
You are slowly getting it right, but if only you care to read more in detail instead of asking to be spoonfed.
m13 had already mentioned the basics of the whole scheme, but it is your own preferred indulgence in always attempting to show-off your superior knowledge above everyon; and which lead you into a rush that pushed you to put your foot into hole that you did not take the trouble to sniff carefully first.
Try sniffing more diligently to what has been written and it will dawn on you the full text of what m13 had written.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It has been proven many times that this ATOBE is only good at BIG TALK because he doesnt really know what he is talking about other than smelling sheep arse, and in return he will try to play poker by threatening you with further BIG TALK.
2 things which you can remember after reading his BS,
1) Panties Sniffing,
2) Panties Sniffing,