Believe in science & ethics
-
Dear MonkeyOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:If someone claims to love you, the scientists can conduct test and do observations to determine whether he is telling the truth or not.
For people like you, there is no need to do tests and observations and just go with the conclusions in your head, right? Delusional, when there is no proof and evidence. I am glad you finally agree with me that you are stupid.
To date, there is no concrete proof that such tests and observations can determine love. Love is expressed in so many different ways that so far all scientific attempts to prove love has never succeeded.
Even the lie detector can be circumvented
Again, stupidity at its maximum.
Continue arguing that 1+1 = 3, you stupid monkey -
oh by the way, if everyone thinks like you stupid monkey, then everyone will go to the lab when they fall in love to determine if they are really in love.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:If someone claims to love you, the scientists can conduct test and do observations to determine whether he is telling the truth or not.
For people like you, there is no need to do tests and observations and just go with the conclusions in your head, right? Delusional, when there is no proof and evidence. I am glad you finally agree with me that you are stupid.
The fact that NO ONE IS DOING THAT shows you are the delusional one.
Andrew is displaying STUPIDITY at its max. Again he thinks 1+1 = 3 -
Yes you did imply Ethics is delusional.
Mathematics have proven that your statement "If there is no proof or evidence, its delusional" applies to Ethics
Since you can't prove ethics, ethics is a delusion to you.
Want more?
1) Philosophies are subjective. There is no one single philosophy that is correct or wrong
2) Ethics is a philosophy. Therefore Ethics is subjective.
3) Science, with its requirement for proof or evidence, is objective
4) Andrew's statement, "If there is no proof or evidence, its delusional", means in Mathematics that ANYTHING that has no proof or evidence is delusional.
5) Since Ethics is subjective, it cannot be proven by any scientific method, therefore based on point (4), ethics is delusional.
No wonder you cannot understand something called Respect of Fellow Humans (which is an ethic), since Ethics to you is delusional. With your rude and obnoxious behavior, no matter how good you are with your head at certain fields, you will never be able to succeed in whatever you do, coz you do not respect others.
Feel free to argue some more. You CANNOT win Mathematics. And to date, aside from ranting about how good Science is, you haven't shown yourself to know any field of Science at all.
Go ahead to or 
, that's all you can contribute to this thread. Stupidity at its absolute, arguing against Mathematics. Its like saying 1+1 is not 2 but its 3.
The more you talk the more stupidity is revealed -
Back to your delusions again?Originally posted by soul_rage:Dear Monkey
To date, there is no concrete proof that such tests and observations can determine love. Love is expressed in so many different ways that so far all scientific attempts to prove love has never succeeded.
Even the lie detector can be circumvented
Again, stupidity at its maximum.
Continue arguing that 1+1 = 3, you stupid monkey
Of course everything can be circumvented and nothing is fool-proof. The question, is whether the "thing that can be circumvented" and is "not 100% fool-proof" is better or your delusion in your mind is better?
After so many pages you hace not gotten the concept?
So your assertion a few pages back that Science is Great was a lie or another of your delusion? 
Gross stupidity. -
You cannot do proper scientific observations and come up with a framework to determine if someone's ethics is valid or not? Suicide bombers are very ethical people and there is no way to prove that their ethics is delusional like the way you are delusional?Originally posted by soul_rage:Yes you did imply Ethics is delusional.
Mathematics have proven that your statement "If there is no proof or evidence, its delusional" applies to Ethics
Since you can't prove ethics, ethics is a delusion to you. -
As expected, the stupid monkey only hasOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:Back to your delusions again?
Of course everything can be circumvented and nothing is fool-proof. The question, is whether the "thing that can be circumvented" and is "not 100% fool-proof" is better or your delusion in your mind is better?
After so many pages you hace not gotten the concept?
So your assertion a few pages back that Science is Great was a lie or another of your delusion?
Gross stupidity. and to defend himself, and has skipped postings that he cannot (or too cowardly) answer
As summarized, you can't argue against Mathematics. And you have only yourself to blame when you imply that people who are in love should go and test themselves since if they don't get tested, its all delusions.
there's not much further need to argue with you. You don't know implicit and explicit proving methodology, and you insist to argue 1+1 = 3 (which is an implicit proof coz you are arguing against the basis of Mathematics). So whoever reads this thread can see who is the delusional and stupid one -
The above is a SUGGESTIONOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:You cannot do proper scientific observations and come up with a framework to determine if someone's ethics is valid or not? Suicide bombers are very ethical people and there is no way to prove that their ethics is delusional like the way you are delusional?
Ethics right now are not governed by ANY scientific method.
Therefore your argument about whether suicide bombers are correct or not in their ethical code IS irrelevant.
The topic is "Anything that has no proof or evidence, is delusional"
Therefore current ethics are all delusional to you.
Once again, the stupid monkey at its max stupidity. 1+1 = 3 -
Who said that ethics is governed by scientific methods? I said that science can inform on ethics.Originally posted by soul_rage:The above is a SUGGESTION
Ethics right now are not governed by ANY scientific method.
Therefore your argument about whether suicide bombers are correct or not in their ethical code IS irrelevant.
The topic is "Anything that has no proof or evidence, is delusional"
Therefore current ethics are all delusional to you.
Once again, the stupid monkey at its max stupidity. 1+1 = 3 Originally posted by AndrewPKYap: 28 September 2007 · 02:13 AM"Use science to inform on your ethical decisions" is "must use science to to decide morally whether..."?
I think you should first take some English comprehension lessons before you make more of a fool of yourself.
What has it got to do with mathermatics, other than in your delusional head? What has Science is not 100% fool-proof but is vastly better than your own delusions got to do with mathematics?Originally posted by soul_rage:As expected, the stupid monkey only has and to defend himself, and has skipped postings that he cannot (or too cowardly) answer
As summarized, you can't argue against Mathematics. And you have only yourself to blame when you imply that people who are in love should go and test themselves since if they don't get tested, its all delusions.
there's not much further need to argue with you. You don't know implicit and explicit proving methodology, and you insist to argue 1+1 = 3 (which is an implicit proof coz you are arguing against the basis of Mathematics). So whoever reads this thread can see who is the delusional and stupid one
You can say anything you like / make any stupid claims about me you like ... it is still delusional without evidence and proof
-
whoever reads this thread will know who is the monkey in boogie wonderland. ha ha!! -
haha, the stupid monkey now has NOTHING left to answer, and now starts to act dumb, and pretend he never made any stupid claimsOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:What has it got to do with mathermatics, other than in your delusional head? What has Science is not 100% fool-proof but is vastly better than your own delusions got to do with mathematics?
You can say anything you like / make any stupid claims about me you like ... it is still delusional without evidence and proof
Even mathematics is spelt wrongly.
You can look above for all the validity of my claims against you. Don't need to look far, just the previous page and this page.
Once again, the monkey at his max stupidity. 1+1 =3. Then now saying he never argued against Mathematics when I have proven his stupidity
Come on, some more , that's all you have. At least you are entertaining and provide me some comic relief in this forum -
Originally posted by Daddy!!:someone saw a monkey with a naked butt jumping on trees in boogie wonderland. wow that is a formidable feat, FA AA Yap. unbelievable. Ha ha!!Originally posted by Daddy!!:28 September 2007 · 08:57 AMsomeone saw a monkey with a naked butt jumping on trees in boogie wonderland. wow that is a formidable feat, FA AA Yap. unbelievable. Ha ha!!Originally posted by Daddy!!:28 September 2007 · 09:02 AMa monkey asking for proof? ha ha! I thought monkey only knows "Monkey see monkey do". A monkey can only imitate. No use to explain too much to a monkey. Can only play with him. Correct hor FA AA Monkey Yap? ha ha !!Originally posted by Daddy!!:28 September 2007 · 09:03 AMhow about Boogie Wonderland's FA AA Monkey Yap? Ha ha!!Originally posted by Daddy!!:28 September 2007 · 09:04 AMdont know your way home to boogie wonderland, monkey? ha ha!Originally posted by Daddy!!:28 September 2007 · 09:06 AMi have evidence that you are behaving like a monkey. want to see it, monkey?Originally posted by Daddy!!:28 September 2007 · 09:08 AMfree the monkey. let the monkey jump around as he wishes. thats humanity. ha ha!Originally posted by Daddy!!:28 September 2007 · 10:16 AMwhoever reads this thread will know who is the monkey in boogie wonderland. ha ha!!Originally posted by soul_rage:28 September 2007 · 10:16 AMhaha, the stupid monkey now has NOTHING left to answer, and now starts to act dumb, and pretend he never made any stupid claims
Even mathematics is spelt wrongly.
You can look above for all the validity of my claims against you. Don't need to look far, just the previous page and this page.
Once again, the monkey at his max stupidity. 1+1 =3. Then now saying he never argued against Mathematics when I have proven his stupidity
Come on, some more , that's all you have. At least you are entertaining and provide me some comic relief in this forum 
Lose the debate also no need to get so worked up. Be careful you get a heart attack. -
Delusional.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Lose the debate also no need to get so worked up. Be careful you get a heart attack.
Already lost the debate and at a loss of words. Now using the standard tactic:
1) Pretend he never made the claim "If there is no proof or evidence, it is delusional"
2) Pretend he never implicitly claimed that current ethics is delusional, based on point (1)
3) Pretend he never implicitly claimed that 1+1=3 (by questioning Logic Mathematics)
4) Pretend he never implicitly claimed that people in love should get tested by Science to prove love. No proof means they are delusional
What else have you to say?
Correct?
-
Of course I made that claim and I proudly stand by itOriginally posted by soul_rage:Delusional.
Already lost the debate and at a loss of words. Now using the standard tactic:
1) Pretend he never made the claim "If there is no proof or evidence, it is delusional"
Implicitly? I said, science can inform on ethics. The "implicitly in your head", was just a delusion in your own head (see 1)Originally posted by soul_rage:2) Pretend he never implicitly claimed that current ethics is delusional, based on point (1)
Please show me where I said 1+1=3 or else get rid of the delusion in your head.Originally posted by soul_rage:3) Pretend he never implicitly claimed that 1+1=3 (by questioning Logic Mathematics)
Implicitly again? Delusion in your head. What I said was that science can observe a person and do some test to determine if he is really truly in love or just out to fool a lady or delusional person.Originally posted by soul_rage:4) Pretend he never implicitly claimed that people in love should get tested by Science to prove love. No proof means they are delusional
I don't need to say anything else. Just get rid of the delusions in your head and you will be OKOriginally posted by soul_rage:What else have you to say?
Correct? -
Whatever lah, Mr Andrew
If you don't understand Logic Mathematics you just aren't able to argue properly. All you can do is to shout and rant.
Till you understand how proving works, you won't be able to comprehend that THOSE who understand Science knows fully well your claim is the root of all your delusions.
Othewise, continue ranting, you just look more and more stupid.
You can't argue against Mathematics. *shrugs* -
Of course you can't argue against Mathematics. Why did you think you could?Originally posted by soul_rage:Whatever lah, Mr Andrew
If you don't understand Logic Mathematics you just aren't able to argue properly. All you can do is to shout and rant.
Till you understand how proving works, you won't be able to comprehend that THOSE who understand Science knows fully well your claim is the root of all your delusions.
Othewise, continue ranting, you just look more and more stupid.
You can't argue against Mathematics. *shrugs*
BTW you also cannot argue against the superiority of science and the scientific method as you have tried to do for last 13 pages. -
hehehe still beating around the bush.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Of course you can't argue against Mathematics. Why did you think you could?
BTW you also cannot argue against the superiority of science and the scientific method as you have tried to do for last 13 pages.
English also got problem.
You don't understand Mathematics and you are still continuing
Carry on! Continue showing us how stupid you are.
The real stupid people are the ones that don't know they are stupid, but instead continue to say others are stupid
and only stupid people like you argue against implicit proof which is part of Logic Mathematics -
Prove it, that I do not understand mathematics... otherwise you are just what? what again?Originally posted by soul_rage:hehehe still beating around the bush.
You don't understand Mathematics and you are still continuing
Carry on! Continue showing us how stupid you are.
The real stupid people are the ones that don't know they are stupid, but instead continue to say others are stupid
If people can accept your statement that I don't understand mathematics, just because you say so.... they can accept the statement that you are a pedophile without any evidence.
Just stop being stupid and back up your statements. -
I don't have to back up my statements.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Prove it, that I do not understand mathematics... otherwise you are just what? what again?
If people can accept your statement that I don't understand mathematics, just because you say so.... they can accept the statement that you are a pedophile without any evidence.
Just stop being stupid and back up your statements.
YOU have already backed up my statements with all your stupid replies
For a person who loves calling others stupid, its really amusing to see you walk on a path of self-destruction (and not knowing some more)
Stupidity at its max, Monkey brains!
1+1=3. Hahahaha -
You don't have to back up your statements? You don't need proof and evidence? That is why you have so many delusions in your head.Originally posted by soul_rage:I don't have to back up my statements.
YOU have already backed up my statements with all your stupid replies
For a person who loves calling others stupid, its really amusing to see you walk on a path of self-destruction (and not knowing some more)
Stupidity at its max, Monkey brains! 1+1=3. Hahahaha -
round and round we goOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:You don't have to back up your statements? You don't need proof and evidence? That is why you have so many delusions in your head.
I just love making the monkey chase the banana
Backing up statements can be done by either myself or someone else.
In this case, you backed up my statements that you are delusional and stupid.
You think Scientific proof equals must say things out word for word? Like if you are stupid need someone to say "HE IS STUPID" to prove you are stupid?
All we need is just you running around making stupid statements, and you have already backed up the fact that you are stupid and delusional
Again, you still don't know implicit proving methodology and nothing about Logic Mathematics by making the statement above.
Continue lah! Just continue to expose more about what you don't know
stupid monkey. 1+1=3!
hahaha -
If other people do it, they will not have delusions in their heads. You refuse to do it, the delusions in your head remains. You think that I am asking you to do it for the sake of other people?Originally posted by soul_rage:round and round we go
I just love making the monkey chase the banana
Backing up statements can be done by either myself or someone else.
In this case, you backed up my statements that you are delusional and stupid.
You think Scientific proof equals must say things out CLEAR. Like if you are stupid need someone to say "HE IS STUPID" to prove you are stupid?
All we need is just you running around making stupid statements, and you have already backed up the fact that you are stupid and delusional
Again, you still don't know implicit proving methodology and nothing about Logic Mathematics by making the statement above.
Continue lah! Just continue to expose more about what you don't know
stupid monkey. 1+1=3!
hahaha Another Delusion. -
The stupid monkey is continuing his rant.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:If other people do it, they will not have delusions in their heads. You refuse to do it, the delusions in your head remains. You think that I am asking you to do it for the sake of other people? Another Delusion.
Now his postings doesn't make any more sense, after losing completely and exposing his total ignorance of Science and of Ethics.
Maybe I should just toss the banana to him to end his misery. -
Lose the debate and resort to name calling? Delusional and stupid not bad enough for you? You want everyone to know that you have no self-control as well?Originally posted by soul_rage:The stupid monkey is continuing his rant.
Now his postings doesn't make any more sense, after losing completely and exposing his total ignorance of Science and of Ethics.
Maybe I should just toss the banana to him to end his misery. -
ok let's end it hereOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:Lose the debate and resort to name calling? Delusional and stupid not bad enough for you? You want everyone to know that you have no self-control as well?
*tosses banana to monkey* -
Originally posted by soul_rage:ok let's end it here
*tosses banana to monkey*