Pity the British's youth
-
Originally posted by Daddy!!:better than being condemned right from the start like a British youth.
-
the rich Arabians, mostly Saudis, own London, push up the property prices and leave the British youths to struggle.Originally posted by Gazelle:What the British government could do is to open up the flood gate for immigrants so that Singaporeans whi.te dic.k suckers can migrate to their England to share the burden of paying taxes to fund their social welfare system. -
It's sad to see Singapore society degrade to only monetary existence.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:and the do not need to worry about their parents falling sick ... and bankrupt them... because NHS is free...
You see old folks of no economic use to their children being kicked out of their house after they have outlived their economic usefulness.
This is the kind of materialistic society that the P4P promotes.
Believe me, I live in support for this kind of system to exploit the poor of society.
Long live P4P.
I hope they come up with more policies to reduce the taxes of the rich and increase the taxes of the poor, so that I will be richer from it.
-
personal guarantee, no one can & will guarantee it.Originally posted by hloc:hahaha.... who could guarantee that
-
m13, are you a British youth ? -
No I am a Singaporean.Originally posted by Daddy!!:m13, are you a British youth ?
I support the P4P's policies of exploiting the poor to support the rich.
Don't worry, I am same as you, we support P4P's policies of exploitation. Just don't let the serfs know that they have been exploited and we should be able to make more money. -
white di.ck suckerOriginally posted by Daddy!!:m13, are you a British youth ? -
We are discussing British youths, m13.Originally posted by maurizio13:No I am a Singaporean.
I support the P4P's policies of exploiting the poor to support the rich.
Don't worry, I am same as you, we support P4P's policies of exploitation. Just don't let the serfs know that they have been exploited and we should be able to make more money.
We can talk about how to help campaign in the next elections later. -
Damn you!!!Originally posted by Gazelle:white di.ck sucker
Don't call my idol LKY a white d|ck sucker!!!
He lived and studied in England during his youth.
Shame on you!!
Calling our beloved LKY names like that!!!
LHL also had his stink in England (formerly called GREAT Britain) and the Great US of A. (ooops, "stink" should be stint, minor typo mistake of mine)
If those western countries are that GREAT, why would our beloved leaders and their lackeys send their children there??? -
m13, you sound like a well educated person when you wrote to me the other time. learn how to control yourself.
what is making you so unhappy about life, m13? -
Because he lost a deal yesterday.Originally posted by Daddy!!:m13, you sound like a well educated person when you wrote to me the other time. learn how to control yourself.
what is making you so unhappy about life, m13?
-
Me unhappy?Originally posted by Daddy!!:m13, you sound like a well educated person when you wrote to me the other time. learn how to control yourself.
what is making you so unhappy about life, m13?
I am very happy with the way things are comparing British youths and Singapore youths.
I am happy with the way how things are addressed by the P4P government.
Those poor British youths should all migrate to Singapore, then perhaps they will have a life under our well renowned P4P government.
Don't you think so?
That is if we want to take in those low life westerners. -
Gazelle, i think you are an idiot. -
I think maybe that's the reason why the majority of our migrants are from 3rd world countries like India, China and Indonesia, because our government don't want those westerners from 1st world countries to migrate to Singapore and be a burdern to Singapore's economy.
-
Let's face it, ALL western democracies are a failure, Singapore is the only kind of political system that they should adopt!!!
-
please dont assume that I wrote these words, because that is exactly what M13 promise to do and I just hope he will honour his words like a MAN with balls and not a man with skirtOriginally posted by Daddy!!:Gazelle, i think you are an idiot. -
I think you owe me the honour, if you read the terms of the contract properly, it did mention specific performance.Originally posted by Gazelle:please dont assume that I wrote these words, because that is exactly what M13 promise to do and I just hope he will honour his words like a MAN with balls and not a man with skirt
Did you perform what was required under the terms of the contract?
In my understanding, you violated the agreement because you failed to prove it.
Maybe you can attach a link to the original agreement for others to see. Did I mention that if you failed to prove that "amount" $700 million, then the conditions will reverse.
There's no need for you to do what was stated in the terms, I have no desire to have my orifice cleaned.
Look at the original agreement again before you make stupid accusations. -
It's sad to see that the MIW agents resort to condemning other countries in order to make Singapore look good.
But deep down in our hearts, we have to ask ourselves, are we really that much better? -
who do you think are MIW agents?Originally posted by maurizio13:It's sad to see that the MIW agents resort to condemning other countries in order to make Singapore look good.
But deep down in our hearts, we have to ask ourselves, are we really that much better? -
M13,Originally posted by maurizio13:I think you owe me the honour, if you read the terms of the contract properly, it did mention specific performance.
Did you perform what was required under the terms of the contract?
In my understanding, you violated the agreement because you failed to prove it.
Maybe you can attach a link to the original agreement for others to see. Did I mention that if you failed to prove that "amount" $700 million, then the conditions will reverse.
There's no need for you to do what was stated in the terms, I have no desire to have my orifice cleaned.
Look at the original agreement again before you make stupid accusations.
1) You have accused the government of inflating figures and according to your stupid calculation, you say it only cost them $120m for the CPF interest hike
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=273383&page=6
I have warn you to becareful about what you said and being as corky as you have always been, you took up the gazelle challenge.
I have prove to you that you calculation is flawed and that PM Lee S$700m figure is correct and based on 2006 CPF account balane, the cost work out to around S$682m, just a mere $18m short of the S$700m.
However please remember that we are using 2006 CPF balance as calculation and you dont need to be a genius to know that if we use the CPF balance in 2007 it will cost the government more than $700m
Please stop trying to argue that the S$700m which PM Lee annouced in his speech has to be exactly S$700,000,000.00 to the last dollar and cents.
Thats so pathatic and puss.y!! -
m13, are you saddened to know that the other side isn't better? -
Err..... why must ppl who disagree with your view instantly becames MIW agentsOriginally posted by maurizio13:It's sad to see that the MIW agents resort to condemning other countries in order to make Singapore look good.
But deep down in our hearts, we have to ask ourselves, are we really that much better? ..... Gazelle most likely does suffer from some form of mental problem, but that is his problem. But I think Daddy!! is mainly expressing his view. So try not to Stereotype ppl. Hahaha, I make a exception of Gazelle & Mat Toro of course.
I met with ppl from some western countries who does express their dislike about their own contries welfare or medical system. Just like us, they too have difference groups of ppl who agree or disagree with certain policy their Govt made.
I, personally, would like some form of safety net for poor and old S'porean. But I'm against the western style Welfare system. I'm still in my early 30s.... not very intrested to pay high taxes in exchange for a 'promise' that I would be look after when I'm old. We all know promises could easily be broken.... and rules change. Just look at the CPF withdrawn age.... -
Originally posted by maurizio13:You must prove that the PM's figure of $700 million.
Deal!!!
If you lose, you shall do those exact same things, but to yourself.
The thing is do you have the brains and the balls to take up your own challenge.
Source: http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=273383&page=6Originally posted by Gazelle:The S$60,000 cap is the maximum amount you can enjoy the 1% increase in CPF rate. ie. if you have $120,000 in your CPF, only $60,000 will enjoy the 1%.
If you refer back to CPF statistic on page 84, total number of people will $60,000 and above is 937,596, which mean, S$56,225,760,000 of CPF from this group will benefit from the 1% hike, which will cost the government $562,225,760
As for those below $60,000 group their total CPF value is S$12,015,540,000, of which 100% will benefit from the 1% interest hike and will cost the government = $120,014,540.
Total Cost : $562,225,820 + $120,014,540 = $682,713,040
Go easy on the arse, because I just had diarrhea this morning...
I do hope you understand the meaning of proof and specific performance in the terms. Go consult a lawyer and see if this were truly a contract document, would it stand up in court?
Is $682 million equivalent to $700 millon?
Is your calculation proof or just circumstantial evidence?
I think if you really want to prove something, you would need to ask your superiors for permission to get a document for the calculation done by your masters.
I know that there were some inconsistencies in my calculation, but I don't know where the error lies. My initial thought was that the 1% extra interest was to help the poor who have balances of less than $60,000, afterall he did say that those with balances above $60,000, have to look after themselves. But thanks to you, I now know that the 1% applies to both the rich and the poor. It's like giving candy to the poor, giving candy to the rich, not telling the poor that the rich received candy too, so that they will feel much better
I know you are working as an agent for the MIW, therefore you should know more about how the figures were derived. So what I merely did was to trick you into giving me the information. You fell for it hook, line and sinker. -
YOU ARE A BLOODY PU.SSY!! PERIOD!!Originally posted by maurizio13:Source: http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=273383&page=6
I do hope you understand the meaning of proof and specific performance in the terms. Go consult a lawyer and see if this were truly a contract document, would it stand up in court?
Is $682 million equivalent to $700 millon?
Is your calculation proof or just circumstantial evidence?
I think if you really want to prove something, you would need to ask your superiors for permission to get a document for the calculation done by your masters.
I know that there were some inconsistencies in my calculation, but I don't know where the error lies. My initial thought was that the 1% extra interest was to help the poor who have balances of less than $60,000, afterall he did say that those with balances above $60,000, have to look after themselves. But thanks to you, I now know that the 1% applies to both the rich and the poor. It's like giving candy to the poor, giving candy to the rich, not telling the poor that the rich received candy too, so that they will feel much better
I know you are working as an agent for the MIW, therefore you should know more about how the figures were derived. So what I merely did was to trick you into giving me the information. You fell for it hook, line and sinker. -
Originally posted by hloc:
I agree with many parts of what you wrote. Honestly, I ain no MIW agent lar.
Err..... why must ppl who disagree with your view instantly becames [b]MIW agents ..... Gazelle most likely does suffer from some form of mental problem, but that is his problem. But I think Daddy!! is mainly expressing his view. So try not to Stereotype ppl. Hahaha, I make a exception of Gazelle & Mat Toro of course.
I met with ppl from some western countries who does express their dislike about their own contries welfare or medical system. Just like us, they too have difference groups of ppl who agree or disagree with certain policy their Govt made.
I, personally, would like some form of safety net for poor and old S'porean. But I'm against the western style Welfare system. I'm still in my early 30s.... not very intrested to pay high taxes in exchange for a 'promise' that I would be look after when I'm old. We all know promises could easily be broken.... and rules change. Just look at the CPF withdrawn age.... [/b]
It is such a kindergarten here.