Everything in Opposition Websites is Fair True and Accurate.
-
Otherwise, they would have been sued for defamation.
For the truth, better read the opposition websites. -
Yes, I fully agree with this...! -
You forgotten Chiam's party ?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
-
Sorry!
-
Thank you for telling us that your posts in this forum are filled with nonsense.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Otherwise, they would have been sued for defamation.
For the truth, better read the opposition websites. -
Denial is delusionalOriginally posted by Gazelle:Thank you for telling us that your posts in this forum are filled with nonsense. -
Are you using opposition website to help boost your credibility in this forum?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Denial is delusional
so damn pathatic... -
are you trying to discourage me from speaking with baseless accusations?
-
I believe in his credibility more than yours.Originally posted by Gazelle:Are you using opposition website to help boost your credibility in this forum?
so damn pathatic... -
Thanks, but just a word of caution for everyone... a person is credible only as far as the "reasons" and the "rationale" that he provides to support his case and you must consider each case on its own merits.Originally posted by ^tamago^:I believe in his credibility more than yours.
Otherwise GST increase is to help the poor (not to enable them to cut corporate tax rates, not enable them to raise their million dollars salaries) would be true just because so and so said it.
If people are given to making suspect conclusions constantly, you have to look at what they say even more carefully but even if people constantly make good reasonable well supported conclusions, you still have to see what and how they support their conclusions. -
Wrong! Go do your research on what defamation is first before you make such idiotic claims, trying to look smart but ending yp looking the fool!!
-
it's funny to see him struggling
-
to some, everything from PAP is fair true and accurate, everything from Opposition is false fake and wrong,
to some others, everything from PAP is false fake and wrong, everything from Opposition is fair true and accurate,
these are all no brainers. -
if you believe that, you're more naive than we give you discredit forOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:Otherwise, they would have been sued for defamation.
For the truth, better read the opposition websites. -
It's ok to be a no-brainer..... But better keep quiet and be suspected of being one than to open one's mouth and confirm it all......!
-
Actually its true to a degree, that opposition websites are not lying per se. Although my be somewhat opinionated, they pretty much cannot lie. Once registered with MHA or whichever ministry or statboard as SG political website, they'll be heavily monitored.Originally posted by the Bear:if you believe that, you're more naive than we give you discredit for -
...just to add, anything not Fair True and Accurate would have been removed by the LEES through their use of the defamation laws...
and I see many posts that give many opinions without bases, reasoning and support for the opinions again... as if you people do not know that only stupid people will trust baseless opinions of anonymous nicks
-
that too...Originally posted by Jontst78:Actually its true to a degree, that opposition websites are not lying per se. Although my be somewhat opinionated, they pretty much cannot lie. Once registered with MHA or whichever ministry or statboard as SG political website, they'll be heavily monitored. -
Originally posted by Gazelle:Are you using opposition website to help boost your credibility in this forum?
so damn pathatic...
meaning you are speaking with baseless accusations, and don't want to be discouraged.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:are you trying to discourage me from speaking with baseless accusations? 
-
means:Originally posted by mancha:meaning you [b]are speaking with baseless accusations, and don't want to be discouraged. [/b][/quote]wow you have such a low level of comprehension, let uncle help you:
[quote]Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
are you trying to discourage me from speaking with baseless accusations?
"are you are trying to discourage me from speaking... with YOUR baseless accusations"
YOUR is redundant. Any primary school kid would have understood that. -
Lets look at what you say again.
First partOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:are you trying to discourage me from speaking with baseless accusations?
"are you trying to discourage me from"
Second part,
from what
"from speaking with baseless accusations?"
From the standard of all your previous posts, you do not have the privilege of poor sentence construction.
Try smarter, not harder. -
Originally posted by mancha:Lets look at what you say again.
First part
"are you trying to discourage me from"
Second part,
from what
"from speaking with baseless accusations?"
From all your previous posts, you do not have the privilege of poor sentence construction.
Try smarter, not harder.
First part: "are you trying to discourage me from from speaking"?
2nd part "with baseless accusations" -
Ok!
I presume you know about punctuation marks.