Everything in Opposition Websites is Fair True and Accurate.
-
The opposition websites are heavily monitored and subject to defamation suits by the Lees and other government figures, like the current defamation suit the Lees took up against the Far Eastern Economic Review.
Conclusion... what they say there is very credible... to know the truth, read their websites. -
All of us believe.... what we wants to believe.....
Since the Opps HAD been sue enough time as it is...... then there is a certain degree that they - as well as PAP - hasn't been all that Accurate or truthful all the time.... -
Don't forget that they are heavily monitored by professionals 24/7 AND subject to threats of defamation suits.
-
Any Politician, whos worth anything, must learn how to twist and turn his/her words to suit their needs. No Politician in this World is ever 100% truthful or Accurate.....
But I will agree that some are more Truthful then the rest........
-
You can get away with it (twisting) unless you are monitored 24/7 by professionals and put in fear of defamation suits. Therefore, it is safe to trust websites that are "monitored 24/7 by professionals and put in fear of defamation suits."
-
Fair true and accurate depends on the evidence provided to support arguments, it has nothing to do with the type of sites that the information appeared on.
-
May I humbly give my personal opinion that the opposition parties in singpore now are the most if not one of the most disciplined , law abiding and kuai opposition party in the world, past, present and future.
This behavior reminds of singaporeans's.
-
But if the evidence provided is bad or if no evidence is supported, then those monitoring them 24/7, those people that issue them licenses will do things to them if the Lees and their cronies do not sue them for defamation as they are prone to do.Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Fair true and accurate depends on the evidence provided to support arguments, it has nothing to do with the type of sites that the information appeared on. -
The letters from public published in SDP Website are all supportive. Does that mean that the public supports SDP and Chee Soon Juan ?
-
I guess the public has not come round to this perspective... that if CSJ is so tightly monitored and what he says is so tightly monitored, then anything that he says that is not stopped is true and accurate and cannot be reasonably stopped.
Anything that CSJ says that is false or inaccurate will be checked.
For example, now that FEER is being sued by LKY and son, anything else that FEER says about Singapore, LKY and son must be true! -
More like anything said about LKY and Son may potentially be sued and anything said about Singapore and the government in general be debated / refuted..hopefully in parliament
-
I believe in WP and SPP
lol... I must be crazy if I believe in SDP... -
but SDP is the most closely monitored! If you cannot trust them, then who can you trust?
-
What about PAP ispyyy?
Do you believe in PAP propaganda? -
I dont even bother look in PAP website... Coz, they r in the newspaper and everywhere...Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:What about PAP ispyyy?
Do you believe in PAP propaganda? -
closely monitor does not mean equal to truth...Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:but SDP is the most closely monitored! If you cannot trust them, then who can you trust?
it is the credibility of the people in there tat matters... -
And hor... I equally trust PAP, WP and SPP as they all have a common goal tat is a SG... The only thing difference is their views on how to bring a better a SG...
-
Trust is built on perception, behaviour observed and other factors over time, not "if they are not being sued, they must be correct".Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:but SDP is the most closely monitored! If you cannot trust them, then who can you trust? -
I dont even bother look in PAP website... Coz, they r in the newspaper and everywhere...
True, we are bombarded with pro-PAP propaganda and pro-Singapore regime propaganda everyday and everywhere.
Internet is only the very few medium that we can escape from PAP propaganda.
How to find articles of this type in the Singapore mainstream propaganda media?
Singapore’s ‘Martyr,’ Chee Soon Juan
http://www.feer.com/articles1/2006/0607/free/p024.html -
Then you'll get into opposition propaganda. Best is take everything with a pinch of salt.Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:True, we are bombarded with pro-PAP propaganda and pro-Singapore regime propaganda everyday and everywhere.
Internet is only the very few medium that we can escape from PAP propaganda. -
Best is to use your own head and think for yourself.
-
Well, those that sent the letters are definitely members of the public that support them.Originally posted by kramnave:The letters from public published in SDP Website are all supportive. Does that mean that the public supports SDP and Chee Soon Juan ? -
Yes, you can study what they say closely but if somebody like the PAP and the government body that issues political website license is doing that, how can you not trust what they say? Impossible! How can you have more resources than a government department that checks 24/7 that what they say is true or not?
Furthermore it is not just the government department but the online community and any time someone spots an error, they can report to the government department and the website has to correct the error. -
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
You can never get tired of this article.
[b]Singapore’s ‘Martyr,’ Chee Soon Juan
http://www.feer.com/articles1/2006/0607/free/p024.html[/b] -
This one is also a gem:
Lee Kwan Yew: a ratbag to the end
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/archives/2007/04/14/2003356611