But if the evidence provided is bad or if no evidence is supported, then those monitoring them 24/7, those people that issue them licenses will do things to them if the Lees and their cronies do not sue them for defamation as they are prone to do.Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Fair true and accurate depends on the evidence provided to support arguments, it has nothing to do with the type of sites that the information appeared on.
I dont even bother look in PAP website... Coz, they r in the newspaper and everywhere...Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:What about PAP ispyyy?
Do you believe in PAP propaganda?
closely monitor does not mean equal to truth...Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:but SDP is the most closely monitored! If you cannot trust them, then who can you trust?![]()
Trust is built on perception, behaviour observed and other factors over time, not "if they are not being sued, they must be correct".Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:but SDP is the most closely monitored! If you cannot trust them, then who can you trust?![]()
I dont even bother look in PAP website... Coz, they r in the newspaper and everywhere...True, we are bombarded with pro-PAP propaganda and pro-Singapore regime propaganda everyday and everywhere.
Then you'll get into opposition propaganda. Best is take everything with a pinch of salt.Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:True, we are bombarded with pro-PAP propaganda and pro-Singapore regime propaganda everyday and everywhere.
Internet is only the very few medium that we can escape from PAP propaganda.
Well, those that sent the letters are definitely members of the public that support them.Originally posted by kramnave:The letters from public published in SDP Website are all supportive. Does that mean that the public supports SDP and Chee Soon Juan ?
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:You can never get tired of this article.
[b]Singapore’s ‘Martyr,’ Chee Soon Juan
http://www.feer.com/articles1/2006/0607/free/p024.html[/b]