While what you say may have some truth but it still does not diminish the paramount importance of democracy.Originally posted by Daddy!!:.........capitalism dominates over democracy, profits dominates ideology.
Shhhhh.....no speak others.....Bush has committed tyrannicide.Originally posted by elindra:I think Bush is the bigger tyrant how he bull doze his way into the Middle East for Oil and the Weapons of Mass Destruction all turns out to be a figment of his imagination.
And history tells you that income inequality will never be sustainable.Originally posted by Daddy!!:quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Daddy!!:
China is a communist country and yet all the western democracies invested in China like seow. What does that tell you ?
wake up Andrew. still dreaming?
===============================================
i am surprised at your IQ level. The logic is so simple that you dont seem to understand.
China is communist country where Chinese people dont have a say in politics. Their PLA controls everything. People get rounded up and get shot like nobody's business. Farmers got chasen out of their land by greedy and politicallypowerful property developers etc. Yet western democracies invested so much in China that China gets to be prosperous.
My question to your simplistic mind is this : To the western democracies, which is more important, ideology or profits, specifically democracy or capitalism ?
The fact that China is made more properous by foreign direct investments teaches us that capitalism dominates over democracy, profits dominates ideology.
From Russia to China, every nation that once believed in the utopia of income equality and tried everything from communism to socialism of various kinds have come to realize that only capitalism works. There is greater income disparity, but everyone is better off.Originally posted by LazerLordz:And history tells you that income inequality will never be sustainable.
Resist all that revisionist crap that you've been hearing, it's not all good all the time.
Again, you show little ability to perform a nuanced and contextual comprehension.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:From Russia to China, every nation that once believed in the utopia of income equality and tried everything from communism to socialism of various kinds have come to realize that only capitalism works. There is greater income disparity, but everyone is better off.
It does not matter if some are far richer than others, as long as everyone becomes better off. The leftist liberals would rather have everyone equally poor and become a north korea.
In the end i guess there will never be a perfect model that both meets the needs and satisfies the wants of everyone. The reason why capitalism prevails is simply because it's pros outweigh its cons, pure and simple when distilled.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Again, you show little ability to perform a nuanced and contextual comprehension.
Utopia, by virtue of its own lexical term, is not capable of existing.
You're right, capitalism tempered with policies that bootstrap the less-well off is fine. Problem is, some policies are sorely lacking because they might hinder supernormal profits for those who make policies.
You did not advise him to apply for a permit?!Originally posted by jessepoh:Dear Doctor Chee Soon Juan,
Please do not test the system again and again, we all know who is the master in singapore.Please do something that will help to change the political landscape in singapore.Start a movement, a soft approach like a non violent non confrontational way(gandhi sitting down despite riot police bashing people) by wearing black gloves(black panther movement in usa fight for civil rights) or black armbands.
Start with small things than tackle heavier stuff like governmental regulations.
All people can see and hear because no wool can be pulled over our eyes or ears.
During Elections, who are supporting PAP ? "the entire machinery" of civil service and "grassroots organisations" are supporting PAP. Why, can someone tell me why?
Should this be so?I thought civil service should be neutral as they are paid in singapore dollars,taxpayers dollars not some party funds.Grassroots organisations should be not be partisan being taxpayers dollars are used fund their activities.
Court Judges are appointed by the party in power, to serve the purpose of judging,passing laws and to preserve the constitution.Please bear in mind who is paying your salary not PAP not workers' party not chee soon juan. we the people of singapore.To serve with honour and pride not to serve vested interests of other people. I am such a idealist but that is the truth. What can we do if party in power appoints judges that "assist" them?
Nonething because i am not the person in power, not you citizens of singapore, people of singapore voted for PAP for this term.So we have to bear with it.You cannot start a people revolution(as in China) with two or three people from workers' party or Mr Low or Mr Chiam right?
So we are in this boat for these years,try your luck in the next election.
You think that PAP can lose their majority in the next election ? I think not for at least next 20 years.
Originally posted by equlus84:Another seldom known fact is that Lxx once worked as English translator for the Japanese during the war years. This in fact speaks great volume of the character and moral integrity of Lxx.....
Originally posted by Rock^Star:Life of a martyr.
[b]A prisoner in his own country
Huang Chih Mei
07 Sep 07
Last week, our children were feeling excited about the coming school holidays and they were talking about what they wanted to do as a family. My husband told them, "Well, I am going to prison next week."
My eldest daughter looked at me and asked, "Is Papa joking or serious?"
I said, "This government doesn't seem to like your Papa very much, does it?"
Soon Juan's travel ban resulted from his bankruptcy has effectively made him a prisoner in his own country since 1 April 2006.
I am partly pleased with the fact that he doesn't need to be constantly traveling and away from the family. At the same time, however, I understand his frustration at not being able to attend meetings overseas, to be there to network with fellow democrats, to make passionate presentations, and to impress upon the international community of the political situation in Singapore.
Most of the time, the world is rather uninformed of Singapore's authoritarian government and its sophisticated yet repressive controls, despite Singapore being a presumably modern, progressive, rich city-state.
Even when they know, many prevailing commercial interests tend to out-weigh the prospects of antagonizing the Singapore government that is very much into business itself. In addition, there are always many well-paid mercenaries to carry out the PAP government's public relations work among various international circles.
Apparently, for most people and organisations around the globe, the cause of those living in third-world countries with their familiar TV images of poverty and unrest seem a less threatening one to defend.
It is a lonely job at home and overseas for any Singaporean democracy advocate.
Despite the authority's rejections for all of Soon Juan's travel applications, there is little we can do about it. Neither do we know how long they will hold him under city arrest.
Personally, I don't really need to get out of Singapore, except to go back to Taiwan to visit my parents. Nevertheless, I can still feel the effects of being confined to a small place, a city without countryside, nor the change of four seasons.
There are people who ask me why I have not become a Singapore citizen after having lived here for more than 16 years. I thought the answer should be quite obvious - it would be a terrifying thought that your own government which is supposed to protect you is instead, your enemy. But, I told them that this place is my home, and I am prepared to grow old in Singapore with my husband and children.
One evening, when our three children were brushing their teeth before going to bed. Soon Juan looked at them and commented, "They are the cushion of our tough life in this political struggle."
True, when my mother asked me, "Are you happy?" I told her that I am not unhappy at all.
Nowadays, three weeks for Soon Juan to be away from home is considered a long time, especially for our children who always enjoy his being around. But, I told them that this unpleasant inconvenience is not going to be forever.
Meanwhile, we will wait patiently for his release from prison. We are not going anywhere else.
Dr Huang Chih Mei, the wife of Dr Chee Soon Juan, is from Taiwan. She has been living in Singapore since 1991.
[/b]