NTUC INCOME is wrong to waive and subsidy teacher legal cost.Important facts missing from medias1.Do u know the teacher employed his own lawyer Andrew John Hanam
and surveyor to claim for extra 188 dollars?He was not happy
with the judgment of Settlement Judge of Primary Dispute
Resolution Centre.
The judge awarded him $188,but he wanted $376!!14.09.2007 ,www.zaobao.com/sp/sp070914_512.html
2.Assomull Madan,lawyer of NTUC INCOME said the teacher's lawyer
wanted to stop the INCOME's appeal for few times.
THis caused the legal cost piled up.The teacher could keep
a netural position by doing nothing.But he wanted to interfere
INCOME's appeals.
His lawyer also apply for Writ of Seizure just for few
thousand dollars.Has other Letter of Demand sent before
applying the Writ?How do u feel if u receive Writ of Seizure
before receiving other demands to pay?
Do not blame everythings on lawyer3.Every one with with sound mind should know legal legiation
is a double edges sword .One's stupid decisions cost
NTUC INCOME some $70,000.INCOME is a co--operative
corp.In the end ,the policy holders pay the bill.
Is it fair for the policy holders to pay for one's
poor judgement?
sorry for his situation but find out all facts 4.Dunt show your tears so easily.Pl dig out all
the facts.