Why are all Malaysians like that huh?
-
Why are all Malaysians like that huh?
come look for trouble, uneducated racist, son of bitches, nothing better to do......
especially the wat haurimau or wat shit and his fellow company of malaysian bastards......
Its seems that all Malaysians are unreasonable, uneducated, blaming others for their own misjudgements and whatever shits -
hmm if i knew anything else about u... i could be picky too...
maybe i can try:
why the fuck you put so many z after such a nice thing like a star? damn stupid leh... wanna create attention issit? then u waste server space also... everytime u post got 3 more bytes to save.. wtf were u thinking?
seriously are u THAT hung up over the behaviors of malaysians? -
hahahaaa
hes just another pot calling the kettle black -
relax not all malaysian but their government lor...i generally believe and find that its citizen are ok...quite similiar to local....Originally posted by starzzz:Why are all Malaysians like that huh?
come look for trouble, uneducated racist, son of bitches, nothing better to do......
especially the wat haurimau or wat shit and his fellow company of malaysian bastards......
Its seems that all Malaysians are unreasonable, uneducated, blaming others for their own misjudgements and whatever shits -
It is only those Malaysians who become power hungry, and seek the spot light that behave in unreasonable way.
The problem is that the more these 'attention seekers' become more vocal in their 'unreasoned' opinions, the more attractive their views become to the uneducated or un-informed or mis-informed Malaysian people.
Most of these attention seekers are from the Malay Malaysian community, and espouse unreasoned thoughts so as to make it simple to be understood by the simple minds Malay Malaysian country folks and urban workers.
Generally, the Chinese and Indians are the "dis-privileged" ones (with the Indians being the worse discriminated lot) when compared to the coddled and privilege Malays of Malaysia.
The Malaysian Chinese and Indian communities can hardly be bothered with the plights of Singapore when they face daily difficulties in making a living from a tight and unfavored space for them to survive.
The non-Malay Sarawak and Sabah people do not have any ill feelings towards Singapore - to name a few, these people are from the various native tribes of which the Ibans and Kadazans are better known amongst a dozen more.
When Singapore separated from Malaysia, they even had the same desire to quit Malaysia and form a nation of 3 S.
It was a good thing it did not materialise as it would certainly be a real ASS of an idea for Singapore to form a single country with Sarawak and Sabah, when we are separated by an expanse of Indonesian and Malaysian waters. -
sabah and sarawak would be better off becoming an independent nation of their own... OR they can see if brunei would absorb them...Originally posted by Atobe:It is only those Malaysians who become power hungry, and seek the spot light that behave in unreasonable way.
The problem is that the more these 'attention seekers' become more vocal in their 'unreasoned' opinions, the more attractive their views become to the uneducated or un-informed or mis-informed Malaysian people.
Most of these attention seekers are from the Malay Malaysian community, and espouse unreasoned thoughts so as to make it simple to be understood by the simple minds Malay Malaysian country folks and urban workers.
Generally, the Chinese and Indians are the "dis-privileged" ones (with the Indians being the worse discriminated lot) when compared to the coddled and privilege Malays of Malaysia.
The Malaysian Chinese and Indian communities can hardly be bothered with the plights of Singapore when they face daily difficulties in making a living from a tight and unfavored space for them to survive.
The non-Malay Sarawak and Sabah people do not have any ill feelings towards Singapore - to name a few, these people are from the various native tribes of which the Ibans and Kadazans are better known amongst a dozen more.
When Singapore separated from Malaysia, they even had the same desire to quit Malaysia and form a nation of 3 S.
It was a good thing it did not materialise as it would certainly be a real ASS of an idea for Singapore to form a single country with Sarawak and Sabah, when we are separated by an expanse of Indonesian and Malaysian waters.
No point being part of a malaysian federation when they are being treated like baggages and backward...
I once saw a malaysian documentary portraying HOW RARE and HOW INCREDIBLE and DISBELIEAVABLE that a student in one of the malaysian university is from a native tribe in sarawak!!!
Tell you all lah.. those upside down nose malays in malaysia think they are smarter then the average horsies.... i think they should just flush their face in their toilet... -
Relax....Not all Malaysians are like wat u mentioned above! Only a handful does dat!!Originally posted by starzzz:Why are all Malaysians like that huh?
come look for trouble, uneducated racist, son of bitches, nothing better to do......
especially the wat haurimau or wat shit and his fellow company of malaysian bastards......
Its seems that all Malaysians are unreasonable, uneducated, blaming others for their own misjudgements and whatever shits -
Not another troll...
-
Not another troll...
-
just accept who they are and what they are.No point arguing.
As describe in the sunday times 27/10/2002.
SINGAPORE and Malaysia's dismal failure to sort out water supply and other outstanding issues that have dogged the two sides in the past decade must have many asking: Why?
The most obvious reason for the protracted to-ing and fro-ing that has yielded little than a lot of sound and some fury is, of course, money, as evidenced by the haggling over water price.
But the chasm appears to be more than one of dollars and cents.
Malaysian leaders and opinion makers have given the clearest signals of this in the sport they make of lobbing accusations at Singapore's approach and attitude.
The epithets that have been hurled south include 'legalistic', 'unreasonable' and 'insensitive'.
Singapore says its lack of response to the barrage is the wish to just 'quietly and politely state the facts and let them stand'.
Another reason for the reticence is the knowledge that politics play a greater role in Malaysian life.
Hence much of what emanates from across the Causeway can be discounted as being aimed at voters from Johor to Kelantan rather than at Singapore.
This may explain why Singapore has been calm - until now.
The turning point came last week when it unleashed an unprecedented broadside against Malaysia.
On the day that talks in Johor Baru between officials ended yet again without any breakthrough, it charged Kuala Lumpur for being not sincere, serious or realistic.
The departure from 'stating the facts' indicates that mere logic no longer serves.
Perhaps Singapore leaders and officials are coming to the conclusion that Malaysia perceives Singapore in a peculiar way.
How?
One theory goes like this: There is an irreconcilable difference between the two countries that not only began with but was the very reason for their separation.
Malaysia wanted a 'Malay Malaysia' and threw Singapore out for its vision of a 'Malaysian Malaysia'.
This is a fundamental divergence in political philosophy between a system that gives special rights to the people of the soil over the other races and one that is meritocratic and colour-blind.
So, on top of the economic competition, there is a contest between two social and political systems that are the antithesis of each other.
A Malaysian who follows bilateral relations told me: 'The rivalry stems from Malaysia wanting to show that, despite its bumiputra policy, it can be better than Singapore's 'so-called' system of meritocracy.'
Another observer, a KL-based Singaporean, explains the 'so-called': 'Malays there question Singapore's success because they see Malay Singaporeans as 'oppressed' '.
But others believe the rivalry goes further. In this view, the success, perhaps even the very existence, of one system becomes an indictment of the other.
During Separation, Malaysia in particular thought it would always better Singapore in three areas: military, economy and water.
These asymmetries give Malaysia sway over Singapore.
New Straits Times reader M. Ghazali Osman said in a letter to the Malaysian daily last month: 'We don't depend on Singapore for anything. Singapore does, very much, depend on us for its existence.'
Nobody expected that the leverage in all three areas would disappear. First, Singapore prospered, which allowed it to gain military parity or more with Malaysia.
Then this year with Newater opening the prospect of self-sufficiency, the last of Singapore's dependence on Malaysia has vanished.
But Malaysia cannot quite believe that if it comes to the crunch Singapore can do without its water. So it still treats the smaller neighbour as a younger brother.
And those who feel the balance shifting regret letting Singapore go 37 years ago. They include Mr Noor Azam who wrote in Malaysia's Berita Minggu in August that former Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman okayed Singapore's 'amputation' in the midst of weathering a bad case of shingles in London.
This kind of thinking, the theory concludes, is the reason that Singapore and Malaysian leaders - at least among the older generation who lived through Separation - approach bilateral issues differently.
But it is clear that Singapore doesn't see ties that way. It sees no special, much less a dependent, relationship.
The question is whether it is beginning to think that Malaysia holds the view that Singapore's success is a critique of its own system - and whether Malaysia in fact does.
On the first question, Singapore leaders have not given any indication publicly how it sees Malaysia see Singapore.
If they believe that Malaysia will not be happy as long as Singapore does well, then it will mean many years of turbulent ties ahead until the new generation without the emotional baggage takes over.
And it will of course colour Singapore's own response to Malaysia's words and actions.
As for the second question, some Malaysians such as Mr Noor Azam evidently consider Singapore's existence as an affront to Malaysia.
But is it the majority view or even the prevailing view among the leaders there?
Both the Singaporean and Malaysian analysts I quote above don't think so.
It is a rivalry, one said, but not a 'I-want-to-kill-ya' kind.
Let's hope that this is really the case. -
Malaysia thought that the Singapore of 1965 will never make it. So basically Malaysia has this hang up because Singapore can whip its northern neighbour militarily and economically.
-
Its about time Malaysia treated us as a sovereign nation, instead of this big brother little brother crap they keep doing. If they do something stupid, which denies or attempts to cease our status as an independent and sovereign nation, everyone knows that they are going to regret when Singapore flags are raised in Johor.
-
Well, first of all, not ALL M'sians are like that.
Its just their politicians that are totally screwed up. The normal M'sians are totally OK guys and gals. They know that cooperating is good for both sides. I scratch your back, you scratch mine... both of us happy-happy.
If they (the politicians) want to carry on with their "big-brother, little brother" act, we S'poreans are nice enough to let them bitch and moan (ie. We are used to it anyway) . We have more military might anyway... Live and let live lah.
Afterall, all the countries in the world know who truly wears the pants around this region (Singapore, just in case one of our northern politicians needs a little help deducing this. ) M'sian politicians are just making their countrymen look petty with their constant bitching and whining.
Anyway, UMNO is definitely better than the PAS... Let Dr M rant and rave every now and then also better than see the PAS take power.
Finally... As long as they are just jaw-jacking, things are nice and fine. But if they try anything funny...
Then the lamp-posts from here to Johor will be decorated with more than just birdshit. -
The majority of the MALAYsians who hold antagonistic views towards Singapore are generally from the "Politically Active" MALAY community; and they try to score points with the "low brow" audience with every extreme radical statement and views that they can make to excite the crowd.
However, their anti-Singapore rhetoric has also aroused the sublime fears of the Chinese and Indian communities in Malaysia.
Although the main parties - MCA and MIC - that represent these two racial groups in the Barisan Nasional Government, pay lip service to support all the anti-Singapore policies, they do not represent the true feelings of the Chinese and Indian Communities.
Most of the common Chinese and Indian Communities are disgusted with the idiosyncratic policies created by the MALAY dominated MALAYsian Government, which has affected them negatively, and reduced their own space.
The Chinese Community is the "bread winner" in the MALAYsia, and yet they are squeezed for every drop of their hard earned profits; while the Bumiputra are favored blindly to the sad lamenting by Dr Mahatir and yet cannot perform to par.
See my other post - "Sit Back and Watch the Show".
If ever push becomes shove, and Singapore is forced to retaliate with the full force of our military, and hold a large chunk of the MALAYsian Territory for our own security, the Chinese and Indian Communities in MALAYsia will be too happy to switch sides.
They missed it in 1965, when Singapore was amputated out of MALAYsia, they will not miss the opportunity a second time. -
i doubt that a lot. i think they would've gotten used to working from within the framework of a malay dominated malaysia by now. changing the system by force would threaten their current status quo.Originally posted by Atobe:If ever push becomes shove, and Singapore is forced to retaliate with the full force of our military, and hold a large chunk of the MALAYsian Territory for our own security, the Chinese and Indian Communities in MALAYsia will be too happy to switch sides.
They missed it in 1965, when Singapore was amputated out of MALAYsia, they will not miss the opportunity a second time.
people are self-centered. they would fight tooth and nail to prevent a Sg dominated peninsula. they fear us and fear for themselves more than they fear the malays now...
also indicative is the fact that the m'sian chinese refuse to give in to english education despite mat's best efforts. this shows that they favour stagnation and retaining their current status quo than to move into something they can't predict or control.
they won't co-operate.
u fancy sending in troops to put down the chinese and indians after defeating the malaysian military? it would look real bad on CNN -
When in 'Rome' do as the 'Romans' do.Originally posted by CX:i doubt that a lot. i think they would've gotten used to working from within the framework of a malay dominated malaysia by now. changing the system by force would threaten their current status quo.
people are self-centered. they would fight tooth and nail to prevent a Sg dominated peninsula. they fear us and fear for themselves more than they fear the malays now...
also indicative is the fact that the m'sian chinese refuse to give in to english education despite mat's best efforts. this shows that they favour stagnation and retaining their current status quo than to move into something they can't predict or control.
they won't co-operate.
u fancy sending in troops to put down the chinese and indians after defeating the malaysian military? it would look real bad on CNN
Many ethnic Chinese and ethnic Indians in MALAYsia have got used to working from within the framework of MALAYsia, but they certainly have to accept many negative policies at a huge sacrifice to themselves.
Witness the large numbers of Johor Chinese and Indian kids that commute daily into Singapore, to attend Singapore schools, at non-subsidised school fees that are much higher than in MALAYsia, and in Singapore Dollars.
Given the opportunity to do so, most of the Chinese and Indian Community in MALAYsia (further north of Johor) would have also sent their kids to Singapore, despite having to commute from their homes at 04:30hrs each school day (morning sessions), and reaching home at nearly 21:30hrs (afternoon sessions).
The Chinese Community, even in Singapore, are well known for their quick reaction and protective instinct towards any changes that will negatively put their community at a disadvantage.
Call it Chinese Chauvinism, or whatever you like, it is no different when many Chinese Schools in Singapore, during the mid-1970's, putting up their strongest resistance when they had to switch to the English medium for all lessons.
This is no reflections that they are anti-Singapore.
The ground swell of quiet antagonism exist for every policy that the MALAYsian Government put up that has a creeping effect of narrowing the space further for the already severely strangled ethnic Chinese and Indian communities.
The Chinese Community throughout MALAYsia (more so in Johor) have always supported Singapore's speak Mandarin Policies, observation of Confuscius teachings, and most Singapore Government campaigns to promote good relations between the Old and the Young, CPF policies, Medisave, hospitalisation plans.
Most of the Singapore government policies to enhance the lives of Singaporeans bring envy to the non-malay MALAYsians - from both sides of the MALAYsian East and West Territories.
They depend on our Channel 8 and Channel U for high quality, sensible entertainment and news in Mandarin, Channel Central for the Indian language programmes, Channel 5, Channel 'i', Channel Newsasia for English. Sometimes, they support the Singapore Government policies more then the Singaporeans.
Although there is a strong public face put up in the Barisan National coalition of all the major RACIAL political parties from UMNO, MCA, MIC with minority involvement from Gerakan and PBI, the feelings from the ground remains antagonistic.
MALAYsia is sittting on a time bomb, with a short fuze.
All it takes is for another MALAY Nationalist, in the flavor of the Mentri Besar of Kuala Lumpur during the 1960's, the UMNO politicians of the mid-1960's, and those from the Singapore USNO in the late 1960's, then another repeat of the racial riots of 1969 will happen. (Read the memoirs of LKY, and from the Straits Times archives of politics during the 1960's).
Notice how long it took for the Tengku Abdul Rahman University to actually come into being, so as to give the ethnic Chinese and Indians, who qualify for university education, to actually get fair treatment for their qualifications to enter university - without any artificial hindrance of quota alotment to the favored 'sons FROM the SOIL'. -
even if we managed to take over johor... i would recommend that its not wise to remain in occupation in the area..
we may have to face malay resistance groups fighting a guerilla warfare wif us...
in the end..when we start to take losses...we still have to retreat...
why dont we might as well implement the soviet 'scorched earth' policy? take over as many important areas as possible...then retreat and burn everythin to the ground johor can become a wasteland already again..the end justifies the means... 
-
oh mine..... We should occupy their land!!!!
Let them see who's the boss....
The M'sians are fools who will never ever face up to reality -
yea,
and then the US will come meddling with our own affairs... -
NoOriginally posted by Prodigy:yea,
and then the US will come meddling with our own affairs...
We will be helping the US to get rid of terrorists - it was written that the Barisan Nasional party is also a terrorists organisation by their close association with the Filipino Terrorist Abu Sayyaf Group.
If the Barisan Nasional is already labelled by the UN as a Terrorist Group, what hope can we be left when looking at PAS ?