Originally posted by Atobe:This is just a continuation of the previous article of Gary Miller.
Hello Kyas,
Your three postings on 21 January 2003 remains without any impressions left on me, and merely confirms my last reply to you, and that is
[b]Religion (and GOD) is created by MAN
Yusuf Islam (aka Cat Stevens) is the epitome of a typical Western Man, who is disenchanted and bored by his own familiar culture and society; and fell into romantic embrace of a foreign culture that mystify him. He is by no means an intelligent person, although he is creative in his songs, which reflects largely his own disappointment with his own life, culture, society, and family life.
Gary Miller (aka Abdul-Ahad-Omar) is no great Philosopher- Thinker, whom one can place beside Homer, Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, or other similar radical dissident luminaries of their own period.
Your writing confirms the fact that Religion is dependent on Human Recording of some Human visions of events that is awe-inspiring.
To name a few, some of these Human Religious Records are the Jewish Torah, the Islamic Koran, the Bible, (which translate the Jewish Torah into readable English language – but carry with it the writings of Jesus’ Disciples as reflected in the New Testament).
The practice of religion in this Twenty-First Century is still dependent on the Human Interpretation of these Ancient Writings, by some Human Being appointed as a Religious Leader - by some Inner Council of Other Humans, whose own appointments are questionable.
Whether the Religions concerned are Anglican, Methodist, Protestants, Lutherans, Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Jewry, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Taoism, Shintoism, and all other Human Faiths – they are all dependent on some HUMAN Interpretation of Phenomena.
Much of your writing confirms my stated position, in which you have written the close observation of the customary practices as interpreted from your Koran.
The “Big Bang Theory” confirms Man’s continuous search for an answer to his vain quest to find out his origin, his purpose on this earth, and his destiny.
The fact that research and knowledge coincide, does not confirm the correctness of one religion or its superiority over the others.
It merely confirms that the Human Mind is the same regardless of Religion adopted or followed or observed or practiced.
When a Society adopts an ‘Ancient Religion’ and allow it to advocate the suppression of any member of its own Human Race – by the evil and narrow minded interpretation of HISTORICAL records – it merely show the inadequacy of that Society to deal with the social, political, economic, and religious challenges of the Twenty-First Century that its society is facing.
[/b]
Remember the Noah's Ark? why it was bulit? Didn't He destroyed the human race as well except a few?Originally posted by stupidissmart:Well... dinosaur never see Man nor Man never see dinosaur in the first place... there is a time lag of a few million years after the extinction of dinosaur (Ice Age) before the birth of Man...
Having tat fact in mind, then I ask why doesn't religion explain anything about the extinction of dinosaur ?? Doesn't tat seem very important to know as since God can kill dinosaur in almost an instant, why wouldn't he do it to Man ? Anyway since God is so good in his way, and we cannot understand his actions, we can not understand why they will rid us when it happened either.... My explanation is tat... no one know about existence of dinosaurs during the earlier days... it is discovered about 1000 AD and above, way after sources were written... Thus no mention in sources, since they don't know, they don't have to explain in folktales and sources etc :p Anyway... u believe in that dinosaurs exist right... the bones etc...
Just think about it... why kill dinosaurs ?? Is it because they fail to entertain ??
The ruling for statue or doll is it should not be looked exactly the same like real human. This is to avoid people from worshipping statues and to differentiate the Muslims with the ones who worship statues. Are there any human being that is as small as the barbie doll? No. therefore it is allowed. (reminds me of some people who worship Maradona... hahah lawak!!)Originally posted by stupidissmart:Anyway about religion tat teaches moral etc... tat is trueI didn't say religion is not without its merits... The number of good deeds done increased due to religion. Wat I wanna say is tat the sources aren't really so true to believe blindly or defend its cause valiantly, thus should evolved with time to better suit the modern Man. I can see no trouble with Barbie dolls, why deprived little girls from them ? doesn't religion have to go with the times by adding new rules like no smoking, no drugs and dispelling rules like having 4 wives and covering the whole head and eating pork when u feel like it... They may be dirty, but how come Japanese tat lives the longest eat pork too ??
Anyway who is the better person, doing good things because they really help the others or doing good things so tat he can get the carrot of going to heaven without the stick of suffering in hell...
Originally posted by stupidissmart:Hehehe... I like the replies recently... I got a religion too... Anti religion
Anyway about the concept of morals, it is true tat science doesn't really teach u about things like returning a found purse or giving up your seat for the old folks. However by probability, if u do more good things, and tat make more people do more things, the chances tat one do good things to u will increaseTat is why I try to do more good things as much as I felt capable to do... Anyway the law does provide something to prevent us from doing something too bad
Anyway... Earth is billions of years old !!! Dinosaur bones proves them !! about 6000 years is probably when human invent writing !!! ANyway oil aren't thousands of years old onlyWell... Darwin does explain something like why your little toe is getting more and more useless... and some part of your organ (appendices... gall ) seems to be fading away and why people reproduce (to make better offspring) concept of beauty (genes pool) and the digging up of old bodies of Man in some cold places tat look like half man, half apes... The last point seems to be the best proof as they r using tools (only human use tools) and they r older than 6000 !!! If u believe in genes, DNA, than u have to believe in Darwin Evolution theory !!!
On that note I would really like to hear what you think about the idea that the restriction against pork was actually for health and hygiene reasons rather than against the animal itself and todays practical revulsion of the animal is an interpretation error. I mean...lots of animals are dirty. In fact so were we...heck everything was filthy in the old days. Pigs are considered especially (it seems to me) haram...why is that?Originally posted by kyas:you know pigs are dirty... what more to explain?
Originally posted by Iknowu:definitely the best forum discussion i've read so far. bout this religion thing.whoever raised the issue, it definitely beats reading bout the original discussion topic. k, i know this might sound kinda lame and others might just kill it of by saying excuses, but this is wat my pastor offered me when i asked him bout all the dinosaurs and things that we have never heard of in the bible. God is our creator. He determines wat we need to know, when we need to know, and how we are to know of it. if He were to describe every being He has created, we would not be able to distinguish wat He actually wanted us to learn from it. The bible wouldn't be a bible if it had all that knowledge and information, it'd be a complete encyclopedia guide!! how's that?
Let's see, after consulting some Food Drugs Admin lifestock webpages, the risk of these diseases can also be contracted via eating other foodstuffs that are not pork. And it does not appear to work experimentally too, we have yet to see truckloads of people at hospitals from these diseases, if at all. Another fact that is supposed to be scientific that fails proper scientific method again. As a matter of fact, if we have to take what he says seriously and follow them true scientifically, then eating any kind of mammilian meat would entail certain destruction for the human race.Originally posted by kyas:Diseases caused by pigs and by taking pork
Name of parasites and the diseases caused
1. Fasciolopsis Buski – Persistent Diarrhoea
2. Round Worms – Pneumonia, suffocation, jaundice
3. Hook Worms – Anaemia, T.B., Diarrhoea and Typhoid
4. Paragonimus – Bleeding of the lungs (Endemic Haemptysis)
5. Clonorchis Sinensis – Clonorchiasis (liver disease)
6. Giganthorinchus Gigas – Anaemia and digestive disorder
7. Metastrongylus Apri – Bronchitis, Abscess of the Lungs
8. Swine Erysipelas – Ordinary Erysipelas Disease
9. Tubercle Bacillus – Tuberculosis
10. Taenia Solium – Diarrhoea, Digestive disorder, Anaemia, Chronic Invalidism
11. Trichinella Spiratis – Trichinosis or Trichinelliasis
12. Variola Suilla – Small pox
13. Sarcoptes Scabiei – Mange of Scabies
14. Fusiformis Necrofurus – Foot-rot
15. Solmonella Cholerasuis – Cholera
I get the above from a book written by a Chinese Muslim Haji Ibrahim Ma. So if you want to know more about the parasites Â… and the diseaseÂ… please do not ask meÂ… too many to explainÂ… hehehÂ… look for yourselfÂ… anyway itÂ’s the people who eat pork who should be worriedÂ…
I'm just pointing out tht mohammed is a thief, robber and a bandit. If he were alive, we could sue him for copyright infringement. The koran is pirated.Originally posted by awestruck:To :Mazohyst
Are u even remotely relligious? Your last post was just plain antagonistic. Why do u have to go and insult another religion?
I freely admit that Im not religious but i do recognise the finer points it tries to teach people. You very obviously have sadly missed those points.
Thus you are either a: not religious
b: wrongly religous
c: an angry person hiding behind the internet
d: some other whacked up crazy
Its people like you that make me sick.![]()
man... pigs arent the onli animals tht carry disease... you noe y u guys dun eat port n dun like dogs? Cuz mohammed din lyk them, so he kinda decided to force everyone not to like them too...Originally posted by kyas:The majority of the chinese should not eat pork
The majority means those who still follow the teaching of Confucius. The teaching of Confucius and Mencius have been based on LEE-CHI (the book of rites). In Chapter SHAO YI it says "CHUIN TZU PU SHEH HOON YU" which means, "a gentleman does not eat flesh of pig and dog", (according to translation of Rev. R.R. Mathew in his Great Chinese -English Dictionary). To ascertain the real meaning of these 6 words I had asked through the Penang Kwong Wah Press members of the public to offer explanation in modern Chinese. After exchanges of views the chief editor of the newspaper, Mr. Longfellow W.C. Liu asked the educationist and famous Chinese scholar Mr. Kuan Ch'en Min wo agreed that those words mean "No gentlemen does eat pork or dog"
Chinese who still accept Confucianism as a religion or teaching and the Book of Rites as a valuable book should at least not eat prok or dog.
Another article wrote by Haji Ibrahim Ma
eeerr...u r...erhm.....2 direct liao......Originally posted by Mazohyst:I'm just pointing out tht mohammed is a thief, robber and a bandit. If he were alive, we could sue him for copyright infringement. The koran is pirated.
watch wat you are saying.this is highly sensative.such replies are a threat to the religious harmony of singapore.I have no choice but to close it.Originally posted by Mazohyst:I'm just pointing out tht mohammed is a thief, robber and a bandit. If he were alive, we could sue him for copyright infringement. The koran is pirated.