my sentiments exactly.Originally posted by hisoka:suspension should only be carried out if the student represents a substantial and proven obstacle to other student's learning.
the point of punishing in the school should be to rehabilate not penalise the victim which is what suspension does by depriving of education and supervision.
besides, i don't see how suspension would work to discipline the kid![]()
as i said not abolished but the criteria to use it changed drastically.Originally posted by selfobliged:At least suspension exist as a way to warn students who went beyond the limit. So it shouldn't be abolished.
soul searching to substitute the lack of education? an errant way of soul searching. how many do this 'soul searching'? it proves ineffective.Originally posted by T E M P O:i agree suspensions shouldn't be used, but in a way it is effective.
When a student gets suspended, he or she is not allowed to enter the school to study, hence will feel weird and probably remorseful. Probably after a period of time, he or she will return to school, and in most cases i've came across, the student has changed for the better. Some even call the suspension period '' soul searching period. ''
So somehow suspension does have its positive effect. However, it should be put on the last few on the list of punishments. ( It already is, though. )
Jail, boys/girls homes might be a better idea.Originally posted by CoolMyth:Nowdays, suspension has to include no usage of internet, handphone, and whatever popular electronic gadgets out there.
The student will definitely wake up his/her idea.![]()
Agree with this. Isolate this person instead of suspension with maybe the principal or a councillor with the person.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:If he's really a nuisance, he can have a spare classroom for himself, with all the materials for him.
If any kind soul would guide him, then that would be good.