you are right, the payout should be 60 - 65 to be meaningful, we still can use the money at this age, at 85 I doubt so, we cant even walk by then. why the government has this kind of mentality, I think there is hidden agendaOriginally posted by mancha:Emperors in the past have searched for longevity elixirs.
Our government gives us the longevity insurance.
Perhaps the 85 years rule is to encourage Singaporeans to strive for long life.
(oo00OOO Better live healthyly, otherwise cannot collect CPF.)
Rural folks live longer.
City folks don't. Even if they do, it must be in a sheltered place.
The annuity scheme is good.
But the payout must be from 60 - 65 years of age for it to be meaningful.
It is of little wonder there is a poll which indicate local as the unhappiest people in the countries surveyed.Originally posted by Meilin86:This is so sad. I wonder why we Singaporean are been forced to work so hard from day to night to cope with the costs and pacing.
Yet we are underpaid. Shi* and fu** the boss.
I am thinking there are more victims on the streets, the problem is that they don't have the guts to speak up. Bring the Pain to work. See the sad faces on the MRT, you will know.
Stress..Stress and STRESS. How Singaporean can be happy again? A Fast pace and lousy place to stay in....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by Meilin86:This is so sad. I wonder why we Singaporean are been forced to work so hard from day to night to cope with the costs and pacing.
Yet we are underpaid. Shi* and fu** the boss.
I am thinking there are more victims on the streets, the problem is that they don't have the guts to speak up. Bring the Pain to work. See the sad faces on the MRT, you will know.
Stress..Stress and STRESS. How Singaporean can be happy again? A Fast pace and lousy place to stay in....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()