Financial Times apologies to PM Lee, MM Lee, Ms Ho Ching
-
In the same way that Durai could win defamation suits against him.Originally posted by kramnave:Thats unsubstantiated isn't it. -
I repeat, thats unsubstantiated isn't it ? Temasek lose up to billions every time they put their hands into US/European ...Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:They will make it easy for PM's husband to buy money losing entities... why do you think Temasek lose up to billions every time they put their hands into US/European ...
but they will scrutinize every transaction that has the possibility of making money.
Temasek, profiteer from Singaporeans and lose the money to foreigners.
and
Temasek, profiteer from Singaporeans and lose the money to foreigners
These statements are not true and you know it but why choose to portray it as the truth ? -
Originally posted by kramnave:
Maybe the above statements are not 100% true. However there might be some truth in them too.
I repeat, that unsubstantiated isn't its ? [b]Temasek lose up to billions every time they put their hands into US/European ...
and
Temasek, profiteer from Singaporeans and lose the money to foreigners
These statements are not true and you know it but why choose to portray it as the truth ?
[/b] -
care to elaborate ?Originally posted by Spartans:Maybe the above statements are not 100% true. However there might be some truth in them too. -
Hahah...another failed attempt by foreign media!! I think the FT reporters are probably being corrupted by the sgforums whiners.
-
Exactly... in a court of law, the case might not stand just as Durai could win defamation suits.Originally posted by Spartans:Maybe the above statements are not 100% true. However there might be some truth in them too. -
not one, mind you... two some more... nowadays we connect our own dots....
-
Do you know something that we don't ?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Exactly... in a court of law, the case might not stand just as Durai could win defamation suits. -
what is new here.
-
So did those dishonorable people come out and provide evidence why FT was wrong? We all know that FT did not have the required evidence to go to court, (who doesn't when the accused have the power to hide all incriminating evidence) but they should if they are honorable people come out openly and provide the evidence to show why the FT was wrong.
-
Originally posted by kramnave:
Don't deviate...
I repeat, thats unsubstantiated isn't it ? [b]Temasek lose up to billions every time they put their hands into US/European ...
and
Temasek, profiteer from Singaporeans and lose the money to foreigners
These statements are not true and you know it but why choose to portray it as the truth ?
[/b] -
Which part of this do you not understand?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Exactly... in a court of law, the case might not stand just as Durai could win defamation suits.
-
That has no link to "Temasek lose up to billions every time they put their hands into US/European..."
and "Temasek, profiteer from Singaporeans and lose money to foreigners"
you want, substantiate and back up your statements..don't go into a non-existent circular argument and talk about Durai.. -
-
aiya, why bother to argue.....
-
exactly, like he doesn't know about the Durai case which showed clearly that just because people win defamation suits, it does not mean that what the accuser says is not true...Originally posted by de_middle:aiya, why bother to argue..... -
So we can accuse anything we like without substantiating ? Because of the above ?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:exactly, like he doesn't know about the Durai case which showed clearly that just because people win defamation suits, it does not mean that what the accuser says is not true... -
We connect the dots and the onus is on those taking public money and holding public office to explain and defend themselves to the public's satisfaction. They have the guns, they are not private citizens... they do not explain, and instead sue people? They are dishonorable. *pui*
-
I don't know what dots you have been connecting, neither do you want to explain..so what dots have you been connecting to come to the conclusion that Temasek did what you accused them of ? I'm curious, care to share your dots ?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:We connect the dots and the onus is on those taking public money and holding public office to explain and defend themselves to the public's satisfaction. They have the guns, they are not private citizens... they do not explain, and instead sue people? They are dishonorable. *pui* -
It is all over the internet... and the latest is.... Barclays... don't act blur this is not the Straits Times..... propaganda won't work and your bosses only reward their family and close cronies, so don't hope for the crumbs to fall from the table.Originally posted by kramnave:I don't know what dots you have been connecting, neither do you want to explain..so what dots have you been connecting to come to the conclusion that Temasek did what you accused them of ? I'm curious, care to share your dots ? -
the latest is SIA buying into China Eastern and make US$660 millions paper value gain within 1 day.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:It is all over the internet... and the latest is.... Barclays... don't act blur this is not the Straits Times..... propaganda won't work and your bosses only reward their family and close cronies, so don't hope for the crumbs to fall from the table.
stop trying lah...your effort will only be appreciate by the sheep in this forum. -
Barclays was an investment. How did Temasek lose billions ? Did they ? Does an investment not translate to ownership ? Or did Temasek just give the money to Barclays with no strings attached ?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:It is all over the internet... and the latest is.... Barclays... don't act blur this is not the Straits Times..... propaganda won't work and your bosses only reward their family and close cronies, so don't hope for the crumbs to fall from the table. -
Global crossing?Originally posted by Gazelle:the latest is SIA buying into China Eastern and make US$660 millions paper value gain within 1 day.
stop trying lah...your effort will only be appreciate by the sheep in this forum.
Worse of all, we know of all these losses (writing off, provisions) and yet they can come out and say that they make make tons of profits... where did the profits come from if not profiteering from their local businesses?
Doesn't the China Easter offset the Barclays at the most? -
to Durai, flying first class without paying first class does not consistute to flying first class. therefore he was able to win his case. so what's new?
-
Please dont being an arse lah...if you want to judge their investment returns, look at their overall portfolio returns and not some childish meaningless day to day paper gain and losses.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Global crossing?
Worse of all, we know of all these losses (writing off, provisions) and yet they can come out and say that they make make tons of profits... where did the profits come from if not profiteering from their local businesses?
Doesn't the China Easter offset the Barclays at the most?