Gays : To all Singapore Religious Leaders
-
According homo supporters, there is neither right or wrong about homo.
Adultery is wrong because u let your other partner down. Incest can give birth to defect children which is cruel. Having sex with animals give uncomfortness to the animals but other than tat I don't really care. Now u say homo is wrong. Why ?
Is it also no right and wrong for incest, adultery or having sex with an animal?I declare myself to be for fairness.If homo is right,I would certainly support it even thou the minority believe so.
I think it is funny for someone to declare themselves as something... Talk is cheap u know... U declare u r fair I declare I am fair, then who is really fair ?U must know what the natural intercourse is.Can anal sex be considered as natural intercourse?Is rectum a sexual organ?
I already said it is up to individual. Anal is not a sex organ but people, even heterosexual, do it. Tat is why 377, not 377a is removed now. The mouth is not a sexual organ too, but people still use it well. The penis is where u urine and the mouth is where u ingest food and water. And people r willing to use their mouth to suck the male sexual organ. Now tell me is tat nature ? The tongue, the finger, the toys, the dildo, the doll etc r all not sexual organs but people r using it. Wat is nature ? why don't u give your definition ?
Then u shouldn't wear shoes as well since the shoes r not your foot. People shouldn't wear specs as well since it is not their eyes and it is against nature. taking cars, using electricity etc r all not nature. So ? Not nature is not equal to wrong.Old fashion sometimes remains good. Some new fashions bring u sexual ailments such as AIDS
AIDs is caused by casual sex. Trying out other sexual experiments with your stable partner is not old fashion and everybody is happy. Now u tell me. If u have a stable sexual partner will u have oral sex ? Will u use your finger to faciltate the atmosphere ? Tell u frankly, I believe more than 50% of the straight population done all these. -
Originally posted by PRP:
Pul-leeze.
If the topic is "amal sex is fun",there would be no debate.
If the topic is "anal sex is neither right nor wrong",I wish to tell geys they will surely lose the debate.[b]In order not to lose,they should refrain from raising the topic.[/b]
The only one who's gonna lose is you, having failed to give any justifications for institutionalised homophobia other than "OMG TEH GEYZ SPREAD AIDZZ!1!!!111one'
In fact, I think you'd be closer to PHAIL than a mere 'lose'. -
Closed?Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:I read half way through the entry, saw one grammar error and close it.
-
It's such misinformation that was being spread in the early 80's that propagated the spread of the disease, you ignorant fool. You've got to be one of those who were guilty of participating in such misinformation.Originally posted by PRP:Old fashion sometimes remains good. Some new fashions bring u sexual ailments such as AIDS. -
Stupidissmart,
I just response to one of your rebutals.
If one can have heterosex, there shouldn't be homo sex.If one engages in hom sex,then he won't go for marriage.
Sex is meant for marriage and have babies and bring them up.
The natural instinct of sex is heterosexual.Something has gone WRONG if one is homo.This is not meant to inuslt geys.Even one is attracted to ppl of same sex,it doesn't mean one has to engage in homo sex.
The percentage of geys have AIDS is higher than herterosexual ppl.U say it is due to too many sexual partners.Even thou one can't marry legally with same sex partner,thats doesn't mean one can cohabit faithfully with one partner.Why do geys have many sexual partners? -
Originally posted by PRP:
I shall enjoy seeing someone get creamed........
Stupidissmart,
1) [b]Sex is meant for marriage and have babies and bring them up.T
2) The natural instinct of sex is heterosexual.Something has gone WRONG if one is homo.
3)This is not meant to inuslt geys.Even one is attracted to ppl of same sex,it doesn't mean one has to engage in homo sex.
4)So why do geys have so many sexual partners?
[/b] -
If one can have heterosex, there shouldn't be homo sex.If one engages in hom sex,then he won't go for marriage.
Different people have different goals and perception. U see sex is only meant after marriage but a lot of people don't see it tis way. A lot of people r married and do not have kids too. More people aren't even married and have blatant sex anywhere and anytime. Some refused to get married too. If u wanna ban, then they r all equally guilty.
Sex is meant for marriage and have babies and bring them up.
Your idea of sex is not my idea. Different peope have different ideas. Don't force your ideas on others.The natural instinct of sex is heterosexual.Something has gone WRONG if one is homo.This is not meant to inuslt geys.Even one is attracted to ppl of same sex,it doesn't mean one has to engage in homo sex.
Everybody is unique. Most people r right handers but there r always left handers. R they wrong ? They r also tomboys and guys acting like girls as well. So r they wrong too ?
If everybody act like wat u expected, then the world is a boring placeThe percentage of geys have AIDS is higher than herterosexual ppl.U say it is due to too many sexual partners.Even thou one can't marry legally with same sex partner,thats doesn't mean one can cohabit faithfully with one partner.Why do geys have many sexual partners?
I think u need to know the focus of the argument. It is not morally right to have multiple sex partners. However 377A affect the one who cohabit faithfully with one partner as well.
Furthermore it is their business anyway. Even of they get AIDs, it has nothing to do with u. And if u really wanna ban AIDs, u should be fair and ban heterosexual as well or people who already got the diesease. -
Verdict: Creamed.
-
Originally posted by PRP:
1)If one can have heterosex, there shouldn't be homo sex.
Homophobe.
2)If one engages in hom sex,then he won't go for marriage.
Frog in well.
3) Sex is meant for marriage and have babies and bring them up.
Ladies, beware. There goes your happiness. Assuming this character is male.
4) The natural instinct of sex is heterosexual.Something has gone WRONG if one is homo.
DISCRIMINATION.
5)This is not meant to inuslt geys.Even one is attracted to ppl of same sex,it doesn't mean one has to engage in homo sex.
Doesn't have to and hence illegal? Discrimination.
6)The percentage of geys have AIDS is higher than herterosexual ppl.
Are you worried for them? Concerned about their well being as a group? And if they don't take up your friendly advice then PROSECUTE them? Sounds hypocritical.
7)U say it is due to too many sexual partners.Even thou one can't marry legally with same sex partner,thats doesn't mean one can cohabit faithfully with one partner.
Stop them from marrying, then accuse them of being prone to infidelity. That's just so low. SOooooooooooooo low.~ Have you any decency left? Huh? Answer lah. Come on.
7)Why do geys have many sexual partners?
Looks like someone is curious......
[/b] -
I cant wait to see how Clandestine respond to PRP's comment...
But to PRP, we are all brought up in a different enviroment, inculcate with a set of somewhat different values. Some of us are able to accept them, while others cannot. If you cant do so, then you should exercise a little consideration as to how the homosexual will feel by your virulent assault on their sexual orientation.
You labelled them as WRONG and you contradict yourself by saying you dont mean it. Who do you think you are to label others as RIGHT or WRONG? Do you think your are perfect and faultless, thus giving you the right to criticise?
When someone mentions 'homosexual', we are usually influenced by how our society and peers view them and our parents teaching which aid in soliciting our negative views come into place. We failed to take into consideration factors before rejecting them. In this case, we have been too judgemental on them. Humans need to love and be loved by other humans. Homosexuals are similar but just that their form love takes on another form. Just because they are different, do you think it is right to deny them love?
Our society 'rejects' homosexual because the adults cannot accept because during their era, homosexuality is deem wrong. But these are views of a bygone era and and should be forgotten lest they hinder progress. We quarrel over such trivial matters and forget about the more important stuff.Why do some of us have to be so selfish and why not lets just "live and let live" and resolve this absurd conflict once and for all?
-
Because religion keeps on harping on this issue. It is about the human perception that an all powerful entity frowns upon his own creation. For progress to take place, religion must take a backseat and not be allowed to dictate how we lead our secular lives.Originally posted by Fairness:I cant wait to see how Clandestine respond to PRP's comment...
But to PRP, we are all brought up in a different enviroment, inculcate with a set of somewhat different values. Some of us are able to accept them, while others cannot. If you cant do so, then you should exercise a little consideration as to how the homosexual will feel by your virulent assault on their sexual orientation.
You labelled them as WRONG and you contradict yourself by saying you dont mean it. Who do you think you are to label others as RIGHT or WRONG? Do you think your are perfect and faultless, thus giving you the right to criticise?
When someone mentions 'homosexual', we are usually influenced by how our society and peers view them and our parents teaching which aid in soliciting our negative views come into place. We failed to take into consideration factors before rejecting them. In this case, we have been too judgemental on them. Humans need to love and be loved by other humans. Homosexuals are similar but just that their form love takes on another form. Just because they are different, do you think it is right to deny them love?
Our society 'rejects' homosexual because the adults cannot accept because during their era, homosexuality is deem wrong. But these are views of a bygone era and and should be forgotten lest they hinder progress. We quarrel over such trivial matters and forget about the more important stuff.Why do some of us have to be so selfish and why not lets just "live and let live" and resolve this absurd conflict once and for all? -
Stupidissmart,
If u think there is nothing wrong with homo sex,why don't geys say homo is right instead of no right & wrong? -
I say i accept geys as any human being but thinks that homo is wrong.Originally posted by Fairness:I cant wait to see how Clandestine respond to PRP's comment...
But to PRP, we are all brought up in a different enviroment, inculcate with a set of somewhat different values. Some of us are able to accept them, while others cannot. If you cant do so, then you should exercise a little consideration as to how the homosexual will feel by your virulent assault on their sexual orientation.
You labelled them as WRONG and you contradict yourself by saying you dont mean it. Who do you think you are to label others as RIGHT or WRONG? Do you think your are perfect and faultless, thus giving you the right to criticise?
When someone mentions 'homosexual', we are usually influenced by how our society and peers view them and our parents teaching which aid in soliciting our negative views come into place. We failed to take into consideration factors before rejecting them. In this case, we have been too judgemental on them. Humans need to love and be loved by other humans. Homosexuals are similar but just that their form love takes on another form. Just because they are different, do you think it is right to deny them love?
Our society 'rejects' homosexual because the adults cannot accept because during their era, homosexuality is deem wrong. But these are views of a bygone era and and should be forgotten lest they hinder progress. We quarrel over such trivial matters and forget about the more important stuff.Why do some of us have to be so selfish and why not lets just "live and let live" and resolve this absurd conflict once and for all?
According a survey published in the newspapers, more that half of the ppl thinks homo is wrong.So are their opinion wrong? -
I didn't want tp read crosshairs' msg.
-
u think there is nothing wrong with homo sex,why don't geys say homo is right instead of no right & wrong?
U don't get wat they r trying to say right... they r telling u there is not such thing as right and wrong in such issue.
It is like u want to drink kopi or tea. U tell people tat drinking kopi is right while others like to drink tea. Then tea drinker tell u there is no right and wrong in drinking kopi or tea. Then u say, if there is nothing wrong with drinking tea, then why don't tea drinker say tea is right instead of no right and wrong ? Is drinking tea wrong ?According a survey published in the newspapers, more that half of the ppl thinks homo is wrong.So are their opinion wrong?
the survery does not they say homo is wrong. please use exactly the right words for it -
I support the gay community and their tenacity but the truth of the matter is that your ass belongs to the government. That's the law. If anyone is gonna f**k you in the ass it's going to be the powers that be
-
Somehow I believe someone here has 2 accounts. Wht do you guys think?
-
I want you to read my messages. If you don't, then you have no right to make any reference to anything to do with my account on the grounds that you lack the necessary infomation and understanding to correctly make any sort of referal or vice versa.Originally posted by PRP:I didn't want tp read crosshairs' msg.
If you feel awful reading my messages, don't worry, it is just me doing it on purpose. -
I dont understand the thinking of some heterosexuals
Did we kill, rob, or what?
And please dont link drugs with homosexuals, you gotta be kiddin me
Talk bout ignorance and stupidity
There are alot of examples here
Anyway, it's a never-ending debate -
Stupidissmart,
Homo sex is morally wrong.
It is OK to choose either tea or coffee because both are good dirik.But surely one shouldn't choose to drink spoilt drink or poison.Homo sex should be categorise as spoilt drink.So it is morally wrong.
Gey eangaage in homo sex surely because they think it is good. If is is not good.would they want to do the act ?So homo supporters should argue from the view of homo is morally right or good.
I believe the majoirty of the people don't accept homo.Why?Probably they think it is wrong.. -
i dont see how open gay communities are bad.... and gays dont choose to be gays... they are just born like that.
and i believe we should not impose our beliefs on other people.
personally i would avoid gays, but they r still humans with feelings and contribute to society too. -
Homo sex is morally wrong.
U still cannot say why is homo wrong isn't it ?It is OK to choose either tea or coffee because both are good dirik.But surely one shouldn't choose to drink spoilt drink or poison.Homo sex should be categorise as spoilt drink.So it is morally wrong.
Who categorise ? u ? Why is homo categorise as spoilt drink while being a monk or a catholic father is not spoilt ? Furthermore if they wanna drink some exotic drink which u think is spoilt, wat has it got to do with u ? Smelly toufu is really spoilt tofu but people like to eat it. Who r u to stop them ? Please provide your rationale.Gey eangaage in homo sex surely because they think it is good. If is is not good.would they want to do the act ?So homo supporters should argue from the view of homo is morally right or good.
Gays do the act because they like it. Who say it must be good ? Wat do u understand by moral ? Some rules fixed thousands of years ago ?I believe the majoirty of the people don't accept homo.Why?Probably they think it is wrong..
U believe, I think, she thought. Show evidence ba -
This guy is so full of circular logic.............
-
I propose we close this thread. This thread is a pointless attack on a group of individuals. Continuing this debate gives certain intolerant individuals an avenue to abuse their so-called right to free speech. I think we have all said enough and heard enough.
-
SIS,
U say choosing homo is like choosing tea or coffee.Both tea & coffee are good drink.So weren't you saying homo sex was good?Aren't u contracdict yourself?What is that "neither good nor bad" argument?
U said geys did homo sex because they like it and it was not becuase it was good.Were u saying homo sex was not good?
Is homo sex good or bad or neither good nor bad?
Higher percentage of geys get AIDS.Why are geys promiscuous and get AIDS?