Gays : To all Singapore Religious Leaders

• Icemoon

  15 Jan 08, 13:26

  Originally posted by Zarks:

  yea one of them is the HIV thingy.
  
  others are more to natural way of men-to-men sex is not acceptable and why men to men cannot give birth to son
  
  pardon me for saying he said gays are wrong in religious way

  I even asked him what's his religion. He did not reply me. So I'm wondering on what basis he said those things.
• ms_ok

  15 Jan 08, 13:26

  Originally posted by Icemoon:

  Though I intend that we should all stop, I suppose it is ok if you want to continue in that direction. But must stick to topic and PRP should stop pursuing whether homo is right or wrong.

  so are you sharing Zarks's view or you share different view?
  
  please state your stand
• Zarks

  15 Jan 08, 13:29

  Originally posted by PRP:
  
  
  [b][quote]Originally posted by PRP:
  [b]I explain again why homo is wrong.It is wrong because:
  
  1.The natural instinct of sex is heterrosexual.Homo goes against nature.
  
  2.The natural purpose of sex is procreation.Homo sex can't achieve the purpose of sex.So it goes against the nature.
  
  3.Higher percentage (than heterosexauals') of local geys are infected with AIDS.
  
  Heterosex in marriage is right & good because:
  
  1.It follows the nature (natural instinct & purpose of sex).
  
  2.Happiness (& responsibilty) to have babies and bringing them up
  
  3.One can be taken care by his children when he is old.
  
  [/b]

  A refresh to our memory of how PRP thinks. Perhaps hes trying to indicate that he's supporting TS in order to minimise homo quantity by explaining why homo is a wrong thing and then since it is wrong , it is the right way to minimise their quantity. HEs talking bout HIV cuz he thought that more homo that will bring HIV, means more danger to community. Thats how i interpreted him. That is why i told him to see the bigger picture bout HIV transmision.
• Icemoon

  15 Jan 08, 13:29

  Originally posted by ms_ok:

  sp PRP is odd one out here, since you disagreeing his direction

  This was my point. I think quite bo liao to discuss whether it is right or wrong, somemore he wants others to agree that it is wrong! Wah leow .. might as well go pluck the moon from the sky la.
• Icemoon

  15 Jan 08, 13:33

  Originally posted by ms_ok:

  so are you sharing Zarks's view or you share different view?
  
  please state your stand

  Wait, assuming Zark's view is about TS comment, then I wonder exactly what TS has in minds. TS said stop, stop what? Educate, educate who? How?
• stupidissmart

  15 Jan 08, 14:15

  Ok stop tis bickering..
  
  First i have to say, I have discussed sincerely with PRP for many threads before but he did not give adequate response. If u need evidence I can give u tons. So we all conclude tat PRP is not really debating and we just ignore him now ok..
  
  And to be frank, happieman and crosshairand ms_ok, just let the things rest. I felt tat it is not good to flame people excessively and icemoon is right in his complaints about the treatment he received. It doesn't reflect right on the anti 377A people as well
  
  Let just let the thread die a natural death
• crosshairs

  16 Jan 08, 16:06

  I'm guessing PRP is a heterosexual prostitute.
• Icemoon

  16 Jan 08, 17:47

  Originally posted by crosshairs:

  I'm guessing PRP is a heterosexual prostitute.

  only one way to find out.
  
  i will make the sacrifice!
• PRP

  17 Jan 08, 00:19

  Originally posted by Zarks:

  if you wan to follow the nature, of course what they are doing is wrong.
  
  but we need to see bigger picture, which concerns on ppl's security.
  
  THey can do the wrong way by nature, but that doesnt mean they deserved to be treated like ill person. They have their life and they know they are wrong but they still gonna be that way cuz that is how they want their life to be.
  
  And up to what or who are we to judge if their action or lifestyle is so much different compared to us?
  
  

  Great that u can understand my opinion.The fact is they say they are not wrong.They claim homo is born.They are not happy when i say homosex is wrong.
  
  I've said that i accept geys as any other person.What more do they want?Do those pro-gey members say they accept me?
• PRP

  17 Jan 08, 00:22

  Happie & Crosshar are gey, liar & slanderer.
• Icemoon

  17 Jan 08, 00:30

  Originally posted by PRP:
  [b]Happie & Crosshar are gey, liar & slanderer.[/b]

  This is uncalled for.
  
  I have tried to end this whole thing, why are you restarting it?
• PRP

  17 Jan 08, 00:37

  Icemoon,
  
  Of course one can't debate with verbal 'terrorists' like Happie & Crosshar.Probably they earn much money from geys or at least they have some selfish motives.That's why they behave in that manner.
  
  SIS is insincere,so reason won't prevail debating with him.
  
  Really,i have more important thing to do than debating with them.It is my wrong.
• Icemoon

  17 Jan 08, 00:38

  Originally posted by PRP:

  Really,i have more important thing to do than debating with them.It is my wrong.

  You should have realized this long ago.
• LazerLordz

  17 Jan 08, 00:42

  Originally posted by PRP:
  [b]Happie & Crosshar are gey, liar & slanderer.[/b]

  Want to call people names, dare not spell them properly.
• PRP

  17 Jan 08, 01:01

  Originally posted by stupidissmart:

  Ok stop tis bickering..
  
  First i have to say, I have discussed sincerely with PRP for many threads before but he did not give adequate response. If u need evidence I can give u tons. So we all conclude tat PRP is not really debating and we just ignore him now ok..
  
  And to be frank, happieman and crosshairand ms_ok, just let the things rest. I felt tat it is not good to flame people excessively and icemoon is right in his complaints about the treatment he received. It doesn't reflect right on the anti 377A people as well
  
  Let just let the thread die a natural death

  Great that u speak fairly!
  
  I do debate with u but I am a person of few words.Long discourse may be very impressive but short msg can go direct to the point.
• Icemoon

  17 Jan 08, 01:03

  Originally posted by LazerLordz:

  Want to call people names, dare not spell them properly.

  Mine is the only name he got correct.
• PRP

  17 Jan 08, 01:05

  Originally posted by Icemoon:

  This is uncalled for.
  
  I have tried to end this whole thing, why are you restarting it?

  They insulted so much.Telling the turth is called for.
  
  Want to end the whole thing is simple,just let them have the last wrods and don't read this topic again.
• PRP

  17 Jan 08, 01:13

  Originally posted by LazerLordz:

  Want to call people names, dare not spell them properly.

  To 'entertain' u,it is not a question of daring.I spelt their names inproperly intentionally.
• LazerLordz

  17 Jan 08, 01:22

  Originally posted by PRP:

  To 'entertain' u,it is not a question of daring.I spelt their names inproperly intentionally.

  So? You think you're funny lah? Comedy time eh?
  
  
• Icemoon

  17 Jan 08, 10:38

  Originally posted by PRP:

  They insulted so much.Telling the turth is called for.

  Even so, why are you stooping to their level?
• happieman

  17 Jan 08, 11:03

  Originally posted by PRP:

  Great that u speak fairly!
  
  I do debate with u but I am a person of few words.Long discourse may be very impressive but short msg can go direct to the point.

  
• happieman

  17 Jan 08, 11:11

  Originally posted by crosshairs:

  I'm guessing PRP is a heterosexual prostitute.

  
• happieman

  17 Jan 08, 12:22

  Originally posted by Icemoon:

  only one way to find out.
  
  i will make the sacrifice!

  so is "he" a female prostitue or are u a "female" client ?
• Icemoon

  17 Jan 08, 12:29

  Originally posted by happieman:

  so is "he" a female prostitue or are u a "female" client ?

  dun tell you.
• happieman

  17 Jan 08, 12:35

  Originally posted by Icemoon:

  dun tell you.

  may be both are colleagues ?