haha. first thing i see when i sign in is this thread...Originally posted by crosshairs:No dicks. That's in direct violation of 377A. Its between 2 females.
How hot is it!![]()
No, homo sex is wrong not only because not reproducing.It is wrong because it is against the natural instinct of sex.The rectum is not a sexual organ.The percentage of geys infected with AIDS is higher than herosexual ppl.Why?Originally posted by stupidissmart:Well homo sex is as bad as not reproducing. If homo sex is wrong, then being monks or catholic priests r equally wrong. If he cannot have sex, he cannot reproduce. If u practise homo sex, u can't reproduce. Same outcome.
but not some heterosexuals oso got engage in anal sex lehOriginally posted by PRP:I state my motive first.I debate here for fun.So i speak honestly.
Ppl who oppose to repealing 377a are not intolerant of geys' lifestyle.The law has been there for a long time and there was a purpose for enacting the law.Anal sex is an unnatural sex.The geys have higher percentage of ppl infected with AIDS.These 2 reasons show that anal sex is wrong & bad.
If the homo supporters can convince us that homo is right & good,then of course anal sex shouldn't be a crime.But geys say homo is no right or wrong.I say no such thing.If geys can't show homo is good & right. many ppl still think that it is wrong & inmoral.
Originally posted by Phaze:And why aren't you guys campaigning to re-establish the laws making oral and anal sex illegal?
And what's the normal position for sex? Should doggie style be illegal? Or Missionary? And probably all of the positions in the Kama Sutra save one?
I guess it's also not normal for people to defecate while sitting. Squat toilets are normal and all sit-down toilets should be illegal.
Originally posted by PRP:statistics are stupid
No, homo sex is wrong not [b]only because not reproducing.It is wrong because it is against the natural instinct of sex.The rectum is not a sexual organ.The percentage of geys infected with AIDS is higher than herosexual ppl.Why?
I've read in some sex education books which say masturbation is wrong.Those books tell the reader how to avoid the habit of masturtabation.(Yes, now some sex educatioan books say masturbation is OK.)Sex is for some pruposes and not just for pleasure.So masturbation is not quite right.[/b]
Even one says he is a gey,I think the police still need evidences to show he has done an anal sex to prosecute him.Am I right?It depends isn't it ? If a girl say tat I molest her and there is no evidence tat proves otherwise, then I am guilty for molesting. There r offences tat do not require evidence
No, homo sex is wrong not only because not reproducing.It is wrong because it is against the natural instinct of sex.The rectum is not a sexual organ.The percentage of geys infected with AIDS is higher than herosexual ppl.Why?Com'on, heterosexual also have anal sex themselves. If they wanna use the anal, wat has it got to do with u ? Wat has tat got to do with society ? Heterosexual also uses sex toys or tree holes or dolly the inflatable doll which r more unnatural and I don't see u care about them. The only problem homo cause to society is simply reproduction.
I've read in some sex education books which say masturbation is wrong.Those books tell the reader how to avoid the habit of masturtabation.(Yes, now some sex educatioan books say masturbation is OK.)Sex is for some pruposes and not just for pleasure.So masturbation is not quite right.Some books ? religious books right ? Wat u believe, u practise it yourself. Don't force us to do the same as u. Show me a scientific/medical website tat shows masturbation is wrong and harmful then I will be more convinced.
Originally posted by PRP:HAHAHHHahahhHAHAHHAA.... man... you really make my day.
No, homo sex is wrong not [b]only because not reproducing.It is wrong because it is against the natural instinct of sex.The rectum is not a sexual organ.The percentage of geys infected with AIDS is higher than herosexual ppl.Why?
I've read in some sex education books which say masturbation is wrong.Those books tell the reader how to avoid the habit of masturtabation.(Yes, now some sex educatioan books say masturbation is OK.)Sex is for some pruposes and not just for pleasure.So masturbation is not quite right.[/b]
Frankly speaking, you have never made any correct argument !Originally posted by PRP:Your arguments are reasonable but not entirely corrrect.
U said my argument made no sense.U are exaggerating your claim.It it realy make no sense,it would be very easy for u to rebut.
I'll probably rebut your arguments in some other days.I maintain my last arguments correct.
Originally posted by PRP:You have made me laugh too !! You are just funny !
No, homo sex is wrong not [b]only because not reproducing.It is wrong because it is against the natural instinct of sex.The rectum is not a sexual organ.The percentage of geys infected with AIDS is higher than herosexual ppl.Why?
I've read in some sex education books which say masturbation is wrong.Those books tell the reader how to avoid the habit of masturtabation.(Yes, now some sex educatioan books say masturbation is OK.)Sex is for some pruposes and not just for pleasure.So masturbation is not quite right.[/b]
It is good to make someone laugh.But don't think u are smart.What i said in fact is all correct.But u think is wrong,that's all.Originally posted by happieman:You have made me laugh too !! You are just funny !
And the same can be said back to you. Are you some kind of authority where homosexuality is concerned? I mean, I read your posts, I get the idea that you believe the majority is always right, and whatever is written down is undisputable truth despite logical arguments aplenty against certain "norms" taken for granted.Originally posted by PRP:What i said in fact is all correct.But u think is wrong,that's all.
1 person debate with 4 or 5 members is a bit hard.But don't forget: about 3000 persons signed the petition to repeal 377a but about 10000 persons signed the petitiion to keep the law.10000/4500000=0.002% of the population. The rest can't be bothered enough to sign it.
Ya ... i think you are the "smartest" among all of us here .. ke ke keOriginally posted by PRP:It is good to make someone laugh.But don't think u are smart.What i said in fact is all correct.But u think is wrong,that's all.
Right to the point!! well done!!Originally posted by stupidissmart:10000/4500000=0.002% of the population. The rest can't be bothered enough to sign it.
What's the percentage of population who sign to repeal the law?Originally posted by stupidissmart:10000/4500000=0.002% of the population. The rest can't be bothered enough to sign it.
Is that an insult or a compliment?Originally posted by crosshairs:No, I think he's gay.
U think u are the smartest -- at least smarter than me,right?Originally posted by happieman:Ya ... i think you are the "smartest" among all of us here .. ke ke ke
U said my argument made no sense.Is this an insult or an dishonest comment?Originally posted by Phaze:I'm not gay and I don't like your argument because it is a very bad argument. Very very bad. Bad on so many levels I don't even know how to start explaining the problems with it. It reveals fundamental misunderstandings on what is 'natural' and ethics in general. But anyway, let's move beyond that for now.
Okay let's take your example, though I don't think you are using the word 'right' in the correct way.
Eating is "right" because you have to eat to live. As you pointed out, if you don't eat, you will eventually die, and death is generally considered a Bad Thing (though overeating is bad as well).
Homosexuality is "right" because when homosexuals improve their quality of life when they have consensual sex with other homosexuals of bisexuals. If homosexuals are denied the ability to have consensual sex with other homosexuality, they will be sexually frustrated and unhappy, and that is a Bad Thing.
Now let's get to your allegation that the instinct of sex is heterosexual, and that homosexuality is indicative of something having gone wrong with the 'natural' instinct.
I agree that homosexuality is a deviation from the normal sexual instinct. But there is nothing 'wrong' with it.
It's natural for my legs to be used for walking. If I use my leg to scratch my other leg, is that 'unnatural'? What about if I use my leg to kick a ball?
Your reasoning frightens me because it reflects a view that we moved away from years ago - and we are far better for it. Your view makes people suffer for what you feel is 'natural'.
Let me give you another example of your version of 'natural'/'right' and 'unnatural'/'wrong'. Many years ago, people thought that right handed was natural and left handed was unnatural. Right handedness was considered 'right' and left handedness was considered 'wrong'. In fact, sinister comes from the latin word for 'left'.
Parents and schools used to try to force left handed kids to use their right hand. This caused a lot of problems and prevented many kids from reaching their full potential as they were effectively handicapped.
We later realized that left-handedness, though 'unnatural' is perfectly okay.
Again, I find it amusing that you try to create the impression that 'geys' don't like your argument even though it makes sense. Your argument makes no sense. Period.