Time for ministers to reflect- are they serving bec of money
-
Ministers are people given the rare opportunities to serve the country and lead the people to overcome whatever their problems and improve their livelihood.
A minister should feel greatly honored to be elected to represent and fight for the citizens even with low or just sufficient pay to keep a certain lifestyle.
A good pay therefore should be optional consideration. It will be a big plus if a good pay is formally predetermined before he is elected as there will be so suspicion cast on his character as someone who is after monies or self-rewards.
Such a carefully anointed minister will be accepted by people as some one with real leadership and character to lead his people with full authority and morality.
Given such a position of honor many people would be too happy to serve the people even less than million-dollar or substantially below million salaries or even below their precedent pay in an existing job.
Why? Because service to the people is an honor. It is a privilege to serve the country even at the risk of sacrificing one's own life.
Why is it that we do not have too many people willing to enter politics to serve the country? The answer is not necessarily lack of material rewards of not enough pays. It may be something else? One reason could be like the old Chinese proverb puts it : "A mountain cannot home two tigers", meaning a talented person cannot serve under head-strong leader.
If our leaders are to recognize such fundamental truth then it will be possible again to attract capable persons who are willing to serve his people even at lesser rewards as compared with his other options.
It is unfortunate that we have too headstrong leader who may be the reason for talents to feel reserved about serving the country.
Let our new leaders recognize this as one of our setback and make changes to attract talents who are willing to serve with change in conditions in the work environment allowing people with good and original and creative ideas to rise up and be tested instead of dictating all policies based on self-centredness and position of power.
It is time for our new leaders to reflect on how they cannot attract people with calibre as it is not pay alone which is the determining factor.
The serving ministers should carefully decide whether they have accepted the above-stated premise for entering politics or they have entered the service because of million-dollar pays.
A man cannot serve two masters - monies and service to his people.
If there is a doubt about the above-stated self-evaluation such ministers should give up their jobs to someone else who could serve the nation with honor and passion without being colored by greed or self-rewards. -
keep whining - thats all you can ever do
-
Whats the major differences between this thread and the minister pay apple to apple thread and the sticky that talks about minister pay.
-
Are you whining about whiners?Originally posted by cutie-pie:keep whining - thats all you can ever do -
Big difference. This thread is a deeper analysis on what causes our lack of talents and what should ministers do to restore faith in the whole system going forward for the good of all.Originally posted by kramnave:Whats the major differences between this thread and the minister pay apple to apple thread and the sticky that talks about minister pay.
Without restoring their moral authority they cannot lead properly with the fullest support of the people. 66.6 is not enough. -
In Spore, its for the money.
Spore ppl are very diff to serve. They complain about everything and are very stingy with praises. -
The gist is still about the salary that they are earning now lah..keep it in one thread lah..Originally posted by robertteh:Big difference. This thread is a deeper analysis on what causes our lack of talents and what should ministers do to restore faith in the whole system going forward for the good of all.
Without restoring their moral authority they cannot lead properly with the fullest support of the people. 66.6 is not enough. -
No need to reflect, they know and we all know they serve the public because of money $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Of course, they will not be so upfront to tell us they are in politics because of money. From what we see, it is obvious they are in the job for the sake of money. If it is not because of money they would not be so daring to pay themselves undeserved super high world class salary.
If politicians serve the public with the motive of earning tons and tons of money they have better off quit. By harbouring the wrong motive of earning tons of money, their hearts are not there to serve the public with sacrifice, compassion, commitment and love for the people. I should say the present bunch of ministers and MPs from PAP should just quit for they are without what I mentioned above. -
And who takes over ?Originally posted by qlqq9:No need to reflect, they know and we all know they serve the public because of money $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Of course, they will not be so upfront to tell us they are in politics because of money. From what we see, it is obvious they are in the job for the sake of money. If it is not because of money they would not be so daring to pay themselves undeserved super high world class salary.
If politicians serve the public with the motive of earning tons and tons of money they have better off quit. By harbouring the wrong motive of earning tons of money, their hearts are not there to serve the public with sacrifice, compassion, commitment and love for the people. I should say the present bunch of ministers and MPs from PAP should just quit for they are without what I mentioned above. -
What cutie pie is that, I have not tasted, is it nice or unpleasant. Hey, you go read what you posted - you are whining!!!Originally posted by cutie-pie:keep whining - thats all you can ever do
-
Why don't you answer the question as well? I believe there will be people/party who are willing to take over. Shall we appoint you as our PM?Originally posted by kramnave:And who takes over ? -
No I don't have what it takes. I don't know who can or who is willing. Today if you ask Low Thia Khiang or Chiam See Tong, i'm not sure if they will and are ready to take over at this point of time.Originally posted by qlqq9:Why don't you answer the question as well? I believe there will be people/party who are willing to take over. Shall we appoint you as our PM? -
Really, Singapore needs people who are dedicated, who care to serve the people with genuine hearts to take over. WE need new blood as well.Originally posted by kramnave:No I don't have what it takes. I don't know who can or who is willing. Today if you ask Low Thia Khiang or Chiam See Tong, i'm not sure if they will and are ready to take over at this point of time. -
Let the who is who come later. Let us not worry too much about who will come and serve us till later.Originally posted by kramnave:And who takes over ?
First and foremost we all citizens must have the courage and determination as a people to speak up and let the leaders know that they have made a fundamental judgmental error by playing with power and authority thereby driving away our talents.
At the right time when condition is ripe there will be many good people stepping forward to serve even without the million-dollar pay. -
Hello!
1st, allow me say I enjoy Robert Teh's postings.
To answer the topic question, unfortunately I can only reply with another question:
Who would say publicly they serve becos of money ?
But I get your point. Just like to add that only. -
Thus, if you are never going to trust the ruling party, it is necessary for the opposition to increase in strength slowly.Originally posted by qlqq9:Really, Singapore needs people who are dedicated, who care to serve the people with genuine hearts to take over. WE need new blood as well.
We also cannot lump the opposition together as one. For me, i feel that WP has potential and that is about it. -
If the answer is honest people can see the honesty too I am sure. If they try to be hypocrite they will be detected as well. There is no absolutely correct or right answer. Probably ministers will be perceived as those with passion to serve and those without.Originally posted by reddressman:Hello!
1st, allow me say I enjoy Robert Teh's postings.
To answer the topic question, unfortunately I can only reply with another question:
Who would say publicly they serve becos of money ?
But I get your point. Just like to add that only.
Those who ignore people's problems and do not seem to understand them at all are the danger.
We can judge from their utterances each on his own merit. -
of cos they do it for the money ONLY lah ... dun believe u ask them to better my offer lor .... just give mi 3 bowl of rice with luncheon meat can already hahha
-
whine moreOriginally posted by robertteh:Are you whining about whiners? -
my offer better. $1200 a month after CPF. sheng jiang say it is possible to survive with $1200 in Singapore wor. maybe he doesn't need transport, water and electricity bah.Originally posted by I-like-flings(m):of cos they do it for the money ONLY lah ... dun believe u ask them to better my offer lor .... just give mi 3 bowl of rice with luncheon meat can already hahha -
hello, where can I buy cutie-pie for eating? I love to eat pies. What are the ingredients in cutie-pie?Originally posted by cutie-pie:whine more -
I sonmehow find that among the ministers in the cabinet, the MND has lost track on the thing he need to do by deviating to world cup.Originally posted by robertteh:Big difference. This thread is a deeper analysis on what causes our lack of talents and what should ministers do to restore faith in the whole system going forward for the good of all.
Without restoring their moral authority they cannot lead properly with the fullest support of the people. 66.6 is not enough. -
Hey, that is the way of shorty, cunning to deviate attention.Originally posted by will4:I sonmehow find that among the ministers in the cabinet, the MND has lost track on the thing he need to do by deviating to world cup. -
If you were talking about goal 2010 and GCT's observation about how France won the world cup with African players, notice that it was the gateway to having more FTs across the board. Perhaps it wasn't about only sports they had in mind. It was just a convenient and softer way to bring the message across. The main message being if we want to win anything as whole, we should bring in FTsOriginally posted by will4:I sonmehow find that among the ministers in the cabinet, the MND has lost track on the thing he need to do by deviating to world cup.
.