Originally posted by LazerLordz:
"In its history, the OSA has only been used once against the press, in 1994. This case, however, caused a considerable amount of uproar, especially from the foreign press. Debate poured forth on press freedom, as well as on the role of investigative journalism.
In this case, the then director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) economics department, Tharman Shamugaratnam, was charged with compromising the secrecy of a piece of information – specifically, the official flash estimates of Singapore’s economic growth in the second quarter of 1992. This information was communicated to Bhaskaran, an economist from a broking firm, who had then told it to, among others, the Business Times senior correspondent Kenneth James.
From James, the flash estimate was e-mailed to several Business Times colleagues, including the Business Times editor, Patrick Daniel. An article in the Business Times then communicated this figure before it was officially released. Daniel was charged with communicating the information to "unauthorised persons, namely, the readers of the Business Times".
What followed was an inquiry by the Internal Security Department. Finally, all five accused were found guilty and fined. "
- Singapore Press wiki.
Interesting to note that Patrick Daniel is now the Editor in Chief of SPH.
Interesting point from this piece published and which no one dared to pick up at that time - was whether these were all fall-guys to protect the groomed heir to the throne.
Now it seems, all the fall-guys have their true just rewards now that the heir has safely ascended the throne.