I dont see what your point is. Most arab countries are rather new, have been under turkish colonial yoke and so on. Have other trouble. And we do know that in most developing countries illiteracy exists.Originally posted by googoomuck:TUNIS (AFP) - Nearly one in three people in the Arab world is illiterate, including nearly half of all women in the region, the Tunis-based Arab League Educational Cultural and Scientific Organisation said Monday.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/arabseducationilliteracytunisia
Go educate your Arab brethren.
While illiteracy affects the entire Arab world, the more highly populated countries -- such as Egypt, Sudan, Algeria and Morocco -- are particularly vulnerable.those are african countries fyi. maybe that's a reason. and the picture in that article is of baghdad, i guess there's no need to explain why life is difficult there or in palestine. eh? thx to usa uk israel.
from cia factbook.
Singapore
Literacy:
definition: age 15 and over can read and write
total population: 92.5%
Korea, North
Literacy:
definition: age 15 and over can read and write
total population: 99%
Brunei
Literacy:
definition: age 15 and over can read and write
total population: 92.7%
Why do you insist on that? Why not answer ALL points? eh mate why evade this issue? dont quibble with words- you term it striptease or not, you can't go topless in singapore(being an anglo phone's co.cksu.cker) nor in ozland in public like your male counterparts NO MATTER WHAT THE SIZE OF YOUR B.OOBS ARE, indicating just because of your bo.obs you're being discriminated against.Originally posted by fymk:Instead of bringing in your idea of seeing a free striptease - why not bring in the issues of women not being treated as human beings but as property to be traded off in marriage. Why not bring in the issue of women not being allowed to choose their partners but instead forced into marriages where they have no escape ?
actually seeing your comments that'd exactly be the advice i'd have in store for you.Originally posted by rooki:17th century mindset + 21st century realities = cultural relativism.
You can continue to stuff your ears and run around babbling, but don't be surprised if you and protonhybrid get castrated by feminists.
DIAF.
I insist on them because those are bigger issues than you expecting to see women's boobies , you perverted piece of male chauvanist. Why not answer my points then? Or are you too busy being chauvanistic to your poor mother and other women? I pity your daughters then.Originally posted by protonhybrid:Why do you insist on that? Why not answer ALL points? eh mate why evade this issue? dont quibble with words- you term it striptease or not, you can't go topless in singapore(being an anglo phone's co.cksu.cker) nor in ozland in public like your male counterparts NO MATTER WHAT THE SIZE OF YOUR B.OOBS ARE, indicating just because of your bo.obs you're being discriminated against.
which i can understand but i can't understand your hypocrisy.
Originally posted by CX:the emboldened part is correct. usa and canada ARE anglophones. whether they lick b.ums or not is of no concern here.
And what is your point? That the [b]US and Canada are "bum licking anglophones"?
You don't seem to know the difference between legacy and sovereignty.
[/b]
to each his own i suppose.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Alternatives that are regressive? [/quote]
I urge you not to make a bigger fool out of yourself.What a joke.that does describe you well. thank you.
[quote]
Go ahead and indulge yourself kind sir.
Originally posted by protonhybrid:I assume that you are an Arab.
from cia factbook.
[b]Go educate your singaporean brethren[/b]
Originally posted by fymk:goes to show how brainwashed you're. who the f*** determined what's bigger or not? and IF you say there's nothing wrong with men going topless AND that men and women are equal and deserve same rights, why BY YOUR LOGIC can women NOT go topless in public like men? your logic fails ms feminist.
I insist on them because those are [b]bigger issues than you expecting to see women's boobies , you perverted piece of male chauvanist. Why not answer my points then?
Or are you too busy being chauvanistic to your poor mother and other women? I pity your daughters then.
not really. only those anglophone co.ck.su.ckers that actually are that i refer to as anglophone's coc.k.su.ckers. eg you and other singaporeans who've been taught english manners, customs, traditions, laws, sports, music entertainment fashion AND MORALITY so you wont transcend anglophone "morality" of women covering their b0obs in public but will transcend all others as anglophones do so!
You can't argue so you call me an anglophone sucker etc. Oh hey anyone who doesn't agree with you becomes an anglophone sucker of some sorts.
first stop speaking singlish it's gross and repulsive. second, malaysia has no place in this discussion.
Go look at Malaysia lah. Malaysia , being a muslim country , at least gives more rights to women than your precious Saudi Arabia.
[/b]
Oh Malaysia has all the place in the discussion. It was a british colony like Singapore. Why don't we hear you ragging about how anglophone it is?Originally posted by protonhybrid:first stop speaking singlish it's gross and repulsive. second, malaysia has no place in this discussion.
FYI, Singapore is immersed in both the Western and Asian cultures. We are by no mean any anglophone wannabe. Please get your idea clear.Originally posted by protonhybrid:the emboldened part is correct. usa and canada ARE anglophones. whether they lick b.ums or not is of no concern here.
You just can't admit that you're born losers in singapore who're used to licking uk's bums clean and savour it.
that's because uk expressly forbid you to admit this. otherwise you'd have done this, as during the officially colonial era.
Originally posted by protonhybrid:Canada? Anglophone? Hmmm... Don't they speak French in Quebec?
the emboldened part is correct. usa and canada ARE anglophones. whether they lick b.ums or not is of no concern here.
You just can't admit that you're born losers in singapore who're used to licking uk's bums clean and savour it.
that's because uk expressly forbid you to admit this. otherwise you'd have done this, as during the officially colonial era.
again talking nonsense as usual? applying random terms like male chauvinism or women's rights aren't going to change facts. fact is you THINK women should be given certain rights (but not men or children, among others) all around the world and IF you had your way you would ENFORCE them all around the world EXACTLY THE WAY YOU THINK IT"S RIGHT. that's fanaticism, fascism my friend.Originally posted by fymk:Oh Malaysia has all the place in the discussion. It was a british colony like Singapore. Why don't we hear you ragging about how anglophone it is?
[/quote]
i bring singapore into this discussion since you're all (at least mostly) singaporeans in here, most issues concern singapore in this forum, and so on. but this thread is about saudi arabia. and most of you are so preoccupied with licking anglophone's behinds clean, that you disparage the saudi law itself!
how does malaysia figure into this? i dont disparage singapore just because it was a british colony per se, but because you and other singaporeans today display such mentality by suggesting british laws be adopted in saudi arabia, that anglophone defined rights are one and only 'rights', that anglophone defined modernity is modernity, and anything else is excess or ridiculous.
malaysia, i'm afraid, has no place in this discussion. dont unnecessarily drag it into this.
[quote]
LOL insults insults. Why ? If you want to wear the proud badge of male chauvanism - wear it proudly and do what you like to preach - suppressing the rights of women - the gender which includes your mother and your sisters and your daughters if you have any.
well mate you again made a complete fool out of yourself, the underlined portion is nowhere to be found in the original article.Originally posted by googoomuck:I assume that you are an Arab.
If you are not, then you are an Arab stooge.
If the rich Arabs are not spending enough to educate their brethren, where would you stand to gain?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4145150.stm
According to the Arab world view, everything is a conspiracy. Everyone is always plotting against them. But for the Arab world, that is not necessarily a negative because it means that nothing is their fault.
In August 2005, the residents of the Palestinian city Jenin attempted to break the world record for the largest sandwich. The record held by Portugal is for a sandwich 634m long.
The people of Jenin planned on making their sandwich 750m long with 180kgs of meat and 600kgs of vegetables.
In the end, fearful of spoiled rotting meat, the Palestinian Department of Health cancelled the venture citing the sweltering summer heat.
“We were planning to add the meat and stuffing at the last minute to rule out any possibility of rotting,” chef and sandwich organizer Ahmed Nazzal told Reuters.”There must be a conspiracy against us by other competitors.”![]()
![]()
If you understand the Arab world, you understand the response. It was classic.
Jenin wants world sandwich record
Last Updated: Friday, 12 August 2005, 11:27 GMT 12:27 UK
Organisers have pledged to rebuild their sandwich away from the sun
Palestinian bakers thwarted in an attempt to build the world's longest sandwich have vowed to try again.
Plans to construct a 750-metre long sandwich along a roadside in the West Bank town of Jenin were vetoed by Palestinian Authority health officials.
They judged that 180kg of meat, as well as vast quantities of vegetables, might rot in the hot sun.
Organisers say they will set another date to make an attempt on the record - but this time in the shade.
Local officials in Jenin had joined forces with bakers and food suppliers in an effort to break the current record of 634 metres, set in Portugal in 2004.
Health fears
"Jenin is well known for fighting the Israeli occupation, and we wanted to give a civilised view of the city," project manager Samir Abu al-Rub told the Reuters news agency.
Jenin has become known for violent clashes in recent years
Fears that the sweltering summer sun could spoil the supplies of sandwich fillings convinced organisers to prepare their baguettes in advance.
But a mere 10 minutes under the burning sun turned the freshly-baked baguettes rock hard.
Visiting health officials banned the bakers from filling the sandwich, citing concerns for public health.
There were plans to hand the sandwich out to the city's poor after sealing the record.
"We were planning to add the [meat] and stuffing at the last minute to rule out any possibility of rotting," chef Ahmed Nazzal told Reuters, hinting that rival food suppliers might have lodged a complaint with health officials.
well it's good that you follow your 'master anglophone's' advice of showing 'dissent' as a form of free speech, dissent which amounts to nothing. afaik, singapore DID support usa/uk's illegal actions of invasion murder kilings lootings etc in iraq in 2003.Originally posted by Spartans:FYI, Singapore is immersed in both the Western and Asian cultures. We are by no mean any anglophone wannabe. Please get your idea clear.
There are time when I did disagree with the policies of the Western worlds. Eg invasion of Iraq by Americans and British. Collateral damage and loss of innocent civilians' lives in the name of fighting terrorism.
english is spoken by a mere 5% of indians at most, however you're correct english is official language of india that's because they were a british colony much like singapore. no it doesn't make india less independent than singapore, but a british colony in disguise nonetheless.Originally posted by CX:Canada? Anglophone? Hmmm... Don't they speak French in Quebec?[/quote]
doesn't mean they dont' speak english! even in one province out of 13, i.e. quebec, they are bilingual. goes to show the dominance of anglophones in that country. also IF quebec separates (quite likely), then canada will be totally anglophone
[quote]
And your vulgar statement on the posterior is exactly what's the problem here.
English is widely spoken in India today, partly because they were a British colony. Does that make them any less independent or sovereign?
I've already told u... U don't know the difference between legacy and sovereignty.
And take your bum licking fetish elsewhere.
Originally posted by googoomuck:
I assume that you are an Arab.
If you are not, then you are an Arab stooge.Laughing
If the rich Arabs are not spending enough to educate their brethren, where would you stand to gain?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4145150.stm
According to the Arab world view, everything is a conspiracy. Everyone is always plotting against them. But for the Arab world, that is not necessarily a negative because it means that nothing is their fault.
In August 2005, the residents of the Palestinian city Jenin attempted to break the world record for the largest sandwich. The record held by Portugal is for a sandwich 634m long.
The people of Jenin planned on making their sandwich 750m long with 180kgs of meat and 600kgs of vegetables.
In the end, fearful of spoiled rotting meat, the Palestinian Department of Health cancelled the venture citing the sweltering summer heat.
“We were planning to add the meat and stuffing at the last minute to rule out any possibility of rotting,” chef and sandwich organizer Ahmed Nazzal told Reuters.”There must be a conspiracy against us by other competitors.”![]()
![]()
If you understand the Arab world, you understand the response. It was classic.
[/quote]
[quote]Originally posted by protonhybrid:well mate you again made a complete fool out of yourself, the underlined portion is nowhere to be found in the original article.![]()
Originally posted by protonhybrid:I'm not your friend and i tire of your senseless tirades.
english is spoken by a mere 5% of indians at most, however you're correct english is official language of india that's because they were a british colony much like singapore. no it doesn't make india less independent than singapore, but a british colony in disguise nonetheless.
my friend, b.um licking fetish is a peculiarity of singaporeans and other british colonies, i'm not one of them.
[/b]
How would a woman given the right to drive a car without a need for a male companion , affect the rights of men or children? How would a woman given the right to freely choose who she wants to marry, affect the rights of men or children?Originally posted by protonhybrid:again talking nonsense as usual? applying random terms like male chauvinism or women's rights aren't going to change facts. fact is you THINK women should be given certain rights (but not men or children, among others) all around the world and IF you had your way you would ENFORCE them all around the world EXACTLY THE WAY YOU THINK IT"S RIGHT. that's fanaticism, fascism my friend.
British laws were once inhumane . A bit of thieving by a young child would get him exiled to Australia easily. The world has progressed with the notion of human rights. The first true human rights document itself came from ancient persia.Originally posted by protonhybrid:i bring singapore into this discussion since you're all (at least mostly) singaporeans in here, most issues concern singapore in this forum, and so on. but this thread is about saudi arabia. and most of you are so preoccupied with licking anglophone's behinds clean, that you disparage the saudi law itself!
how does malaysia figure into this? i dont disparage singapore just because it was a british colony per se, but because you and other singaporeans today display such mentality by suggesting british laws be adopted in saudi arabia, that anglophone defined rights are one and only 'rights', that anglophone defined modernity is modernity, and anything else is excess or ridiculous.
malaysia, i'm afraid, has no place in this discussion. dont unnecessarily drag it into this.
this is what i get when i click the linkOriginally posted by googoomuck:Haha....got you ! Just because you cannot find in the article does not mean that what I wrote is not true. Did you search Reuters news in the net?
When you can't catch a fish does it mean there's no fish in the water?
Can't stop you from calling me a fool... BUT...you are the BIGGER FOOL...kekeke![]()
![]()
Quote:
Reuters
Palestinians abandoned a quest to build the world's longest sandwich on Wednesday after health officials told them their 750-metre construction risked rotting in the West Bank summer sun.
Hundreds of volunteers spread a 750-metre-long bun on tables along a dusty roadside in the West Bank city of Jenin, long a hotspot of Israeli-Palestinian violence.
But the attempt was called off for health reasons before volunteers got a chance to add 180 kg of mortadella meat, 350 kg of tomatoes and 250 kg of green peppers.
Organisers had planned to serve the sandwich to the poor, and said they were aiming to beat a record set in Portugal in 2004 for a 634-metre sandwich.
"We were planning to add the mortadella and stuffing at the last minute to rule out any possibility of the sandwich rotting in summer sun," chef Ahmad Nazzal said.
"There must be a conspiracy against us by other competitors," he said.
http://search.gulfnews.com/articles/05/08/12/176946.html
yes singapore is a fawning colony of anglophones. nicely put. thanks for the admission.Originally posted by CX:I'm not your friend and i tire of your senseless tirades.
If u are already convinced that this is a fawning colony that worships western imperialism, then who am I to argue with your "facts" ?![]()
![]()
You are certainly entitled to your own views, no matter how skewed and absurd.
