Will Israel be peaceful in 2008?

• boi.moudi

  24 Jan 08, 15:12

  Originally posted by Timmay:

  
  
  "are you talking bout palestinians wanting to migrate to israel?"
  
  Why are you ignorant to not read Protonhybrid's post?
  
  I really don't understand
  
  I put Protonhybrid's quote on my counter-post regarding "No one needs invitation to settle in any country they like "
  
  Clearly, it was to indicate who I was typing in response to
  
  And it was about his finding my above statement funny
  
  So why do you think I'm talking about Palestinians wanting to migrate to Israel?

  you are askin me why i was thinkin that u are talkin bout palestinians??? because this whole topic is about the Palestinians and Israelis... Dont digress... what does this whole migration thing has got to do with the issue? it obviously doesnt have.
• Timmay

  24 Jan 08, 18:07

  Originally posted by boi.moudi:

  you are askin me why i was thinkin that u are talkin bout palestinians??? because this whole topic is about the Palestinians and Israelis... Dont digress... what does this whole migration thing has got to do with the issue? it obviously doesnt have.

  WAKE UP
  
  If you've read the posts CAREFULLY
  
  You'd have noticed that it was LINKED to my defending Joooooos' migration to Palestine
  
  Besides
  
  Protonhybrid has made many ridiculous digressions
  
  ALL of which I had to rebut
  
  And you accuse ONLY me and not him of digressing?
  
  Where's your sense of fairness?
  
  SOME examples
  
  

  no like stating chinese are better than indians, who're better than malays. that aborigines of australia are less capable than negroids of africa among other things. etc etc.

  does this mean singapore is a bastion of colonialism AFTER official termination of this system by britain? if so, thanks for admitting this. and shame on singaporeans.

  Laughing hypocrisy at its best (worst, dep. on definition).
  some b@stards brought over by british to lands that are foreign to them, then they become majority in tiny red dots or patch of lands thanks to british, and now they speak about democracy blah blah balh as their masters chant.
  
  yet when it comes to facts they backtrack. in the region they occupy aren't the majority the very same groups they fight against and oppose. what retarded mentality is that? or is it hypocrisy at its worst/best again dep. on defn?

  Out of world's six inhabited continents they've wiped 4 out of their original religions sometimes even inhabitants. half of africa too. and in asia they're gaining ground through treachery such is the menace.

  Furthermore
  
  Next time you want to make a post, think carefully before you do so
  
  And not make another post, like
  
  

  gee... Timmay, why do i always see you asking for facts and sources when you post very little to none?

  and
  
  

  you are askin me why i was thinkin that u are talkin bout palestinians??? because this whole topic is about the Palestinians and Israelis... Dont digress... what does this whole migration thing has got to do with the issue? it obviously doesnt have.

• protonhybrid

  27 Jan 08, 05:35

  
  You couldn't rebut me with credible sources(Above posts)
  So
  YOU being desperate
  Any 'O' how
  Took my one of my statements OUT OF CONTEXT

  mate it appears you epitomize idiocy. you say it's a joke that immigrants need invitation to appear anywhere and settle there. why is it a joke? unless you're a joker that is. this is the MOST sane aspect of property rights, personal ownership etc. otherwise everybody will be nomads, and granted illegal immigrants like israelis, singaporeans, etc wish it were acceptable and the norm, but this isn't in civilized world for understandable reasons like maintaining racial, religious, ethnic, cultural, culinary, civil, social, socioeconomic, political, sartorial, military, technological, educational, cohesional order among others.
  
  

  No one needs invitation to settle in any country they like

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  "does this mean I can settle in any part of the world I like"
  
  

  Why can't anyone settle in any part of the world they like?

  are you trying to be facetious? why can they? there is simply NO REASON for them to. otherwise there would be no legal framework, no international law, no respect for property rights, no individual rights, no individual cultural, religious, ethnic, racial, culinary, sartorial etc expressions unique to one group etc.
  
  "no international boundaries should be respected?"
  
  

  You DON'T when you settle legally

  the laws can be changed at will by politicians etc. many countries were colonized like singapore, you being the result of one such misadventure. do you think it's okay that britain write your laws, institutionalize them, and criminalize those who violate britain's laws in asian countries and african ones etc since it's "illegal". britain made the laws, but who the hell made britain the lawmaker/legislator?
  
  "or does this also imply I can let's say take over your house, your neighbours's etc so I dont need any legal instruments for that. as long as I "wish"?"
  
  And
  
  

  so I can come to settle in singapore, usa, israel north korea, china, japan, taiwan at my will eh? including timmay's personal home eh? at will?

  You are MORE THAN WELCOME to take over anyone's houses provided you do so legally
  
  EG: Like buying their property with their PERMISSION
  
  If we come to a good price, settle in my house!
  
  But I don't own my house....(Too bad so sad)

  is this the pinnacle of idiocy? as stated above, singapore's laws are british derived laws, as a bloody anglophone's buml!cker it acts like and despairs and craves everthing quintessentially british. does it mean britain should take over all of the world since britain's law (can) say so?
  
  britain did take over 1/4 of the world, and they did bl00dy legalize it? there are certainly many many looopholes in any man-made laws, so you're saying like in usa, the one with more money should be awarded the 'spoils' so to speak. since he can rent the better lawyer, and win any case?
  
  
  does this mean I can take over your land, whole of singapore and declare it a legal property of mine, and change the law of the land to suit my desires? then anything i do will be "legal" all the while i usurp your property and that of singaporeans (granted it's not the best of examples, as singaporeans are themselves descendants of illegal immigrants brought over from other regions by britain, they'd tend to support illegal immigration, however if recently others do migrate to signapore even if legally it becomes a problem, so it seems).
  
  what about the anti-immigrant ruckus in singaporean media, this forum and elsewhere? hypocrisy at its best my friend, although i'm not surprised for this is what summarizes thieves, burglars, looters, pillagers, beggars who'd no homes and had to seek homes in british occupied lands until britain could 'grant' them those lands in other parts of the world, yet they dont go back to where they came from such is the leech that these anglo buml!ckers epitomize.
  
  Hence
  
  

  No one needs invitation to settle in any country they like

  
  ( AS LONG AS THEIR IMMIGRATION IS LEGAL )
  
  STILL STANDS

  you mean as long as legality is defined by uk?
  
  who made it "legal" for jews from anywhere on earth to settle in palestine? no one!
  who made it "legal" for jews from ukraine, poland, russia etc to go to palestine and speak russian or yiddish etc? no one!
  who made it "legal" for jews from europe to settle in palestine with names like "bernstein", "goldberg", etc? no one!
  
  etc
  who made it "legal" for jews to move to palestine yet maintain a "european" like lifestyle, as in music, fashion, dress, governance etc etc and seek military, economic, political, scientific etc help from european -derived nations where they have strong jewish lobby? again, no one!
  
  and can i ask where and how did "jews" originate?