Terrorists say they following founding fathers??
-
I heard that some terrorists say they are following george washington and his gang for founding america..how true is that??
-
Which terrorists?
George and his gang were also considered traitors and terrorists by the British.
Sun Yat Sen also terrorist to the Qing regime. -
well said... history is written by the victors...Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Which terrorists?
George and his gang were also considered traitors and terrorists by the British.
Sun Yat Sen also terrorist to the Qing regime. -
Yeah, but founding fathers of countries will also limit their damage to military objectives. Modern day terrorists are out for widespread genocide.
-
Terrorists organisations usually only have a handful of troops.
Genocide needs a lot of manpower.
I don't think such a policy can succeed.
Which group wants genocide? -
All i know is there ain't any new countries for them to 'find' or help.
-
They don't need a lot of manpower, just some very destructive weapons, say NBCs, I remember that Russia did lose some nuclear metrological devices 2 years back and not all recovered. If such devices were used to make dirty bombs, expect several thousands to be affected.Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Terrorists organisations usually only have a handful of troops.
Genocide needs a lot of manpower.
I don't think such a policy can succeed.
Which group wants genocide? -
worst misinformation ever.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:Yeah, but founding fathers of countries will also limit their damage to military objectives. Modern day terrorists are out for widespread genocide.
Carpet bombing, anyone?
It's good PC to say you want to limit collateral damage. But if your most dangerous enemy is hidden amongst people you don't really care about, and you have the ability to take out that entire block of people....few people would really think twice over it. -
If the enemies hide among their own people as cover, they don't really care about their lives either. These innocent people, especially children, are expendable like this.Originally posted by deathbait:worst misinformation ever.
Carpet bombing, anyone?
It's good PC to say you want to limit collateral damage. But if your most dangerous enemy is hidden amongst people you don't really care about, and you have the ability to take out that entire block of people....few people would really think twice over it.
-
Did the founding fathers of the present United States have bombers to execute carpet bombing? Second, they do not want to live in a land they ruined themselves so they could be indepedent.Originally posted by deathbait:worst misinformation ever.
Carpet bombing, anyone?
It's good PC to say you want to limit collateral damage. But if your most dangerous enemy is hidden amongst people you don't really care about, and you have the ability to take out that entire block of people....few people would really think twice over it.
But given a choice between taking out the human shields used by terrorists with the terrorists or letting the terrorists get away, I would wipe everyone out. -
JI is one, Al Qaeda is another. They want to rid the world of all infidels.Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Terrorists organisations usually only have a handful of troops.
Genocide needs a lot of manpower.
I don't think such a policy can succeed.
Which group wants genocide? -
JI is one, Al Qaeda is another. They want to rid the world of all infidels.
It would be nice to set JI against Al Queda, but JI is mostly routed out already. -
Nah, they broke down into semi-autonomous cell-groups something like the New IRA operation modus.Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:It would be nice to set JI against Al Queda, but JI is mostly routed out already. -
We welcome terrorists to attack the ERP gantries ...