Is this unjust or is this unjust?
-
I joined this argument late.
But correct me if I'm wrong.
The contract signed specified no compensation. Stall owner was essentially given a 18k interest free loan for a few years.
How is this in any remote why the government's fault? -
Only a delusional would say something like that without providing any link to support the view.Originally posted by deathbait:I joined this argument late.
But correct me if I'm wrong.
The contract signed specified no compensation. Stall owner was essentially given a 18k interest free loan for a few years.
How is this in any remote why the government's fault?
Without a link, people can have delusions, like you, about anything they want. -
You are arguing from stupidity and ignorance. If simply saying it was a mistake and people can get away with anything, the please explain why this guy can't just say he made a mistake selling his condo and make everything better?Originally posted by allentyb_v2.01:YOU ARE EVADING THIS QUESTION, TIME AFTER TIME AFTER TIME
You are a moronic fellow who can't understand simple english at all, time and time.
ANSWER IT, if they doesn't realise it has been a mistake, why would they want to repay back the money, huh?
IF YOU CAN'T EVEN ANSWER AT ALL, WHAT IS THE POINT OF YOU TRYING SO HARD TO ARGUE WITH ME, IT IS VERY CRYSTAL CLEAR, THAT YOU ARE A MORONIC FELLOW WHO CHOOSE NOT TO ACCEPT THAT YOU ARE IN THE WRONG, SO SHUT THE F U C K UPSorry, you must sell
Then why compensate the gangster for the canning mistake?
Electric New Paper, Singapore - Jan 11, 2008
He had also signed the option for the buyers to buy the unit in front of the housing agent. Justice Lee said in his judgment: 'He would have to explain why, ...
..and if someone burnt down your house and tell that it was a mistake, he burnt down the wrong house, don't complain, OK? It was just a simple mistake on his part. Idiot. -
You are too stupid to know, don't ask. It is already clearly stated in the earlier posts.Originally posted by lagrangian1125:Which part of the law did Allentyb confuses with??
Pls enlighten us and dont skip this post!
-
Originally posted by lagrangian1125:
Did I say that the price of Thai Baht would appreciate against the Singapore dollars because Thailand can be reached by bus? That is a idiotic conclusion on your part. Proving once again that you an idiot.
His warp logic... Investing in thailand BECAUSE THEY CAN BE REACHED BY BUS.
Then, by his logic, all sporean should invest in Malaysia since we can reach there by bicycles or even by foot!!!!
Can u see how silly he is?!!![/b]
Edited to add chart, and I was proven absolutely right! Only an idiot like you would use this example and make a fool of yourself. -
Since you are so stupid, let me give you this quoteOriginally posted by allentyb_v2.01:YOU ARE EVADING THIS QUESTION, TIME AFTER TIME AFTER TIME
You are a moronic fellow who can't understand simple english at all, time and time.
ANSWER IT, if they doesn't realise it has been a mistake, why would they want to repay back the money, huh?
IF YOU CAN'T EVEN ANSWER AT ALL, WHAT IS THE POINT OF YOU TRYING SO HARD TO ARGUE WITH ME, IT IS VERY CRYSTAL CLEAR, THAT YOU ARE A MORONIC FELLOW WHO CHOOSE NOT TO ACCEPT THAT YOU ARE IN THE WRONG, SO SHUT THE F U C K UPSingapore Government Regrets Canning Mistake - Singapore's Online ...
So the despots in this case are idiots, according to you, for compensating the gangster for a Canning Mistake?
- [ Translate this page ]
Govt regrets error, but says $3m demand not acceptable .... but i would award anything from 300000 to half a million with the following rationale and logics ...
www.sgclub.com/singapore/singapore_government_regrets_18672.html - 180k - Cached - Similar pages
Idiot. -
Still you are evading a very simple question, and answer my question with another one, oh please, it is very crystal clear that you are just plain too stupid, and ball less prick and jolly well, knows the answer to that question
If they have read the terms and condition, they wouldn't have accept the cheque, it is you who refuses to acknowledge how screwed you are in this argument, and throughout this thread and flame war, so many people are against you and still you can't even see it at all, my works are done here, i refuses to continue flaming a person living in self delusion, who can't even type more than 300 words, yet you wishes to engage in a flame war, do yourself a favour, next time, if you want to post something about the government, get your facts right.
You relate a matter, which is about gangster about him being canning into this matter, over at this thread, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TERMS AND CONDITION, OVER WHETHER WHAT HDB IS RIGHT OR NOT this is already shown your stupidity level stood to the lowest point,
stick to the THREAD, DON'T RELATE UNNECESSARY ARTICLE TO THIS,
It is a very simple question, If the mdm lee has read the terms and condition beforehand, will she even accept the cheque?
If you can't even answer a simple question like this, then truly you are hopeless
just answer - YES OR NO
CUT THE CRAP, YOU ALREADY LOST THE FLAME WAR -
REFRAIN FROM ADDING THAT GANGSTER CANNING MATTER, INTO THIS CASE, BECAUSE THAT IS A CLEAR CUT MISTAKE BY THE GOVERNMENT, DICKHEAD
NOW WE ARE DEBATING ABOUT THIS ARTICLE, NOT THAT, IF YOU CAN'T EVEN THE SIMPLE QUESTION, SHUT THE F U C K UP
YES OR NO, SIMPLE AS THAT, DON'T CONFUSES OTHERS WITH ANOTHER UNRELATED ARTICLE. STOP GIVING EXCUSES WHEN, WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS, SELF DEFEATING.
GOD, CAN YOU EVEN TYPE ANY POST, MORE THAN 300 WORDS -
STOP EVADING MY QUESTION WITH ANOTHER UNRELATED ARTICLE
Answer this then, if they doesn't realise it has been a mistake, why would they want to repay back the money, huh? If you can't answer it, then it is self defeating, and don't make things up, like HDB threaten them with lawyer letter, thats why they want to repay back the money, in fact, they tried to contact them in 2004, but couldn't
JUST ANSWER, YES OR NOMs Gina Lau regrets the advice she gave to her mother, who would have preferred to continue working to keep herself busy. "If HDB had told us earlier, I wouldn't have asked her to give up the stall," said the 46-year-old insurance agent.
Even they admit to it, and wants to repay back, what more can you said!
.
"We understand a mistake has been made but why did they take so long to find out? And they should give us alternatives, instead of just the letter of demand."Ms Lau said she and her siblings can put together the $18,000 and they "don't mind paying" — but there is a twist.
.
She hopes that the NEA, at the same time, can help secure a new stall for her mother at the refurbished hawker centre, "as my mother's friends are all there".Then, last September, an officer from the National Environment Agency (NEA) came knocking.
.
The officer informed the widowed mother of five that the HDB had made a mistake with the payout and the money had to be returned. According to the board, its earlier attempts to contact her since 2004 had failed.
.
Earlier this week, the letter of demand from the HDB arrived.The board also said Mdm Lee had not indicated any difficulty in returning the money when its officers visited her.
.
"She can contact us for assistance if she has difficulties in returning the money," it added. -
That incident is already a clear cut mistake, and the matter has been resolved, and this matter is not being resolved
In this case, HDB make a mistake and screwed up, and mdm lee and her family also screwed up,
But for the canning of the gangster, the judge admitted there is a mistake, and there can be a compensation - this matter, already shown very clearly, that the judge make a mistake, AND THE JUDGE ADMITTED IT IS THEIR FAULT
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT, AT LEAST, YOUR DESPERATE ATTEMPT AT TRYING TO SALVAGE BACK YOUR FACE, HAS FAILED COMPLETELY,
I WILL NOT STOP TILL YOU ANSWER IT,
FIRSTLY, YOU SCREWED UP AT CONSIDERATION, BECAUSE THAT AGREEMENT IS VOIDED,
SECONDLY, YOU ARE EVADING MY QUESTION, WHICH SHOWS THAT YOU ARE BALL LESS, TO ADMIT TO YOUR MISTAKE
THIRDLY, WHATEVER YOU ARE DOING IS SELF DEFEATING, WHEN THE VICTIM AND HER FAMILY, WILL WANT TO PAY UP THE MONEY
WHAT MORE CAN YOU ARGUE,
QUIT QUOTING SOMETHING, THAT IS NOT RELATED TO THE ARTICLE,
STICK TO THIS ARTICLE, ANSWER THAT SIMPLE QUESTION
YES OR NO -
NO ONE HERE NEED TO APOLOGISE TO A MORONIC FELLOW LIKE THAT ANDREWYAP
HE IS NO DOUBT A MORONIC FELLOW LIVING IN HIS OWN SELF DELUSIONAL WORLD WHICH CAN'T FACE IT TO THE FACT THAT HE ALREADY LOST THE FLAME WAR, STILL WANT TO ARGUE TO SALVAGE ANY LEFTOVER FACE THAT HE STILL HAS, HE TOTALLY, CAN'T UNDERSTAND HOW HIS IDIOCY CAN TORMENT PEOPLE, BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO MAKE HIM UNDERSTAND, ALL THIS IS TOTALLY HIS OWN FAULT
THIS IS A DEBATABLE ARTICLE, I ALREADY ASK HIM A LOT OF TIMES FOR A SIMPLE ANSWER
YES OR NO
YOU HAVE BEEN HALF QUOTING WHAT I HAVE TYPED, MORON, AND FOR THE LAST TIME, QUIT TRYING WHATEVER YOU ARE DOING, BECAUSE YOU ALREADY FAILED -
If i am the one who is wrong about all this, i wouldn't be the one, getting flamed by people all the time in this thread, and people has eyes to see for themselves, who has make the biggest mistake in this thread, not getting his facts right
and you keep quoting from article that is not related to this thread at all, i ask for a simple answer, and you can't even answer it, or you already know the answer to it already, It is a very simple question, If mdm lee has read the terms and condition in the 1993 agreement which clearly stated that she is not entitle to any compensation, will she even accept the cheque at all!
A simple answer - YES OR NO
All this can be prevented to be escalate to such a incident, if she didn't accept the cheque, it is as simple as that, but you are the one wanted to drag the gangster matter into this
when that matter is already resolved, where the judge admitted that it is their mistake, and compensation can be claimed for the additional canning, just not 3 million!
Now this matter is still unresolved at all, simply because, both, HDB and mdm lee has screwed up, which can be argue in court to decide,
If you don't read the article, and still insisting on living in delusion that you can win this flame war, take a good look around you, how many is on your side and sticking to the thread, and making any sense at all, and how many people are flaming you,huh?
Do you have any facts from the article to proof yourself that you are right, and convince people that you are right, if you have, i would have shut the f u c k up already, but the truth is, i am still here, and you can't even counter back my post properly with a decent 300 words, and still win me, fat hope, until you can even come up with a decent 500 words posting, then don't bother to even counter my post back at all, because you really sucks at it, and furthermore, time and time, i have successfully counter back with something from that article to counter me back, the answer is NO, YOU CAN'T
If you keep half quoting what i have typed, are you ball less even that you can't even answer a simple question! You are the type of person, i am seeing every single day at speaker corner which i deem as barking dog, which is noise, anything sensible at all, just some whining moronic fellow, who is vex about the government, if truly the government has no credibility, they couldn't have last for such a long time, even for suharto, he didn't last long as well, did he has a outcome, like what despot should suffer, no he didn't, he is still a wealthy man, and all charges against has been dropped by the indo court, due to his ailing health, and they wishes to settle out of court with suharto!
It is people like you, can't understand what is happening all around the world at all, never even bother to read the article before even commenting, barking at the wrong article, make a fool out yourself, and type short post, a couple of 80 words, and wants to shut me up, wow, you must be impressed by your 80 words, that already clearly show how stupid you are, you can't type anything at all, just selective reading, and desperate attempt to mislead people to think you are right, all i want is a very simple answer, is it too hard for you to answer. If any dickhead or moronic fellow or pea brain fellow out there, beside andrewyap, thinks he can desperate attempt to counter this, try at least, come up with a 1000 words, or at least the same amount of words that i have typed out so far, but if you can't, SHUT THE F U C K UP
EVEN THAT ANDREWYAP CAN'T EVEN ANSWER A SIMPLE QUESTION, WHAT MORE CAN ANYONE OF YOU OUT THERE, CAN DO TO ME, SHUT ME UP, I AM AFRAID TILL THIS MOMENT, NONE OF YOU CAN DO SO! BESIDE WHINING AND BARKING AT THE GOVERNMENT, SLANDERING THE GOVERNMENT, CURSING AT THE GOVERNMENT, AND THAT ANDREWYAP IS GOING TO HALF QUOTE WHAT I HAVE TYPED OUT, AND COULDN'T EVEN TYPE ANYTHING THAT IS DECENT ENOUGH OR CONVINCING ENOUGH
ANDREWYAP
A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION
If mdm lee has read the terms and condition in the 1993 agreement which clearly stated that she is not entitle to any compensation, will she even accept the cheque at all!
A simple answer - YES OR NO
STOP EVADING IT!!!!, DON'T GIVE ME THE CRAP, THAT HDB SHOULDN'T HAVE OFFER HER THE CHEQUE, OR QUOTE ANYTHING ELSE BESIDE THE ARTICLE, OR RELATE THIS MATTER TO ANOTHER ARTICLE, BECAUSE I ALREADY COUNTER BACK THAT ARTICLE OF YOURS ALREADY
HDB DID TRY TO CONTACT MDM LEE IN 2004, THATS WHY THE SITUATION HAS TO COME DOWN TO LAWYER LETTER -
I have read all earlier posts and U MADE NO ATTEMPTS TO SAY WHICH LAW ALLENTYB FAILS TO CONNECT WITH IN HIS ARGUMENT. For f ucking sake, tell us the penal codes and state the laws out professionally.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You are too stupid to know, don't ask. It is already clearly stated in the earlier posts.
U are no more than a stupid farking idiot who should already be in IMH because u are the one who is living in self delusion.
Answer my post and allentyb post , u bloody farking NOOB! -
Urs is pure dumb luck. Trying to deny what u have said....???? Take a look at ur old post I have quoted in the previous post. U DID SAY ...Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Did I say that the price of Thai Baht would appreciate against the Singapore dollars because Thailand can be reached by bus? That is a idiotic conclusion on your part. Proving once again that you an idiot.
Edited to add chart, and I was proven absolutely right! Only an idiot like you would use this example and make a fool of yourself.
"If you have savings, convert some of your money into Thai Baht... because Thailand is the second biggest economy in SEA... and you can go to Thailand by bus..."
The word AND is a union of the set. This is simple English and simple logic. Or are u just so farking crazy and dumb to realize that??
-
Just in case u are trying to evade my qns again.Originally posted by lagrangian1125:Which part of the law did Allentyb confuses with??
What law is the HDB breaking for asking back the money which is the public money?
What injustice is done to the old lady if she and her children did not even understand the contract they are signing? Obviously they could have seek legal advice if they do not understand the contract.
Can u state out the laws broken and the codes of the law since u seems to "understand" so much of the basics of spore law that u can even point out allentyb has made a mistake?
Pls enlighten us and dont skip this post!
Evading our qns only signifies ur stupidity and incompetency in comprehension.
Maybe ur dick head is too small to accommodate any normal brain and eyes to analyze and read our questions. -
I don't understand why this argument is so difficult to understand.
1) woman signs contract that waives compensation
2) woman takes the compensation
3) HDB wants compensation money back
How is it HDB's fault again? If anything, the woman was taking advantage of the government.
I don't need links. Everything I have was taken from the article YOU linked -
who opened the box, who should close...
-
You are too stupid to understand, then you are too stupid, all you need to know had already been posted.Originally posted by lagrangian1125:Just in case u are trying to evade my qns again.
Evading our qns only signifies ur stupidity and incompetency in comprehension.
Maybe ur dick head is too small to accommodate any normal brain and eyes to analyze and read our questions. -
Flip flopping idiot. What did you say in the first post of this thread?Originally posted by deathbait:I don't understand why this argument is so difficult to understand.
1) woman signs contract that waives compensation
2) woman takes the compensation
3) HDB wants compensation money back
How is it HDB's fault again? If anything, the woman was taking advantage of the government.
I don't need links. Everything I have was taken from the article YOU linked
I asked you to provide the link that says 'Stall owner was essentially given a 18k interest free loan for a few years' and you flip-flopped. Idiot.Originally posted by deathbait:I joined this argument late.
But correct me if I'm wrong.
The contract signed specified no compensation. Stall owner was essentially given a 18k interest free loan for a few years.
How is this in any remote why the government's fault? -
Originally posted by lagrangian1125:
another post to prove that you are too stupid to understand what people write... those were other good reasons why Singaporeans should buy and not reasons why Thai Baht would appreciate against the S$. Idiot.
Urs is pure dumb luck. Trying to deny what u have said....???? Take a look at ur old post I have quoted in the previous post. U DID SAY ...
"If you have savings, convert some of your money into Thai Baht... because Thailand is the second biggest economy in SEA... [b]and you can go to Thailand by bus..."
The word AND is a union of the set. This is simple English and simple logic. Or are u just so farking crazy and dumb to realize that?? [/b] -
Either brilliant analyst or heaven's favoured child (having so much luck) and can pick out of so many, the correct one... it is fine with me.Originally posted by lagrangian1125:Urs is pure dumb luck. -
Originally posted by allentyb_v2.01:
Why not? They made her a new offer, a new agreement...
A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION
If mdm lee has read the terms and condition in the 1993 agreement which clearly stated that she is not entitle to any compensation, will she even accept the cheque at all!
A simple answer - [b]YES OR NO
[/b]
... continue with the stall or give up and get S$18K
and they say that it was their mistake... well make a mistake, the minister in charge take the responsibility and resign for squandering tax payers money. Not act unjustly, make agreement and then say it is a mistake and send her warning letter. Simple. -
Link them to me then.....show me then...cos WE DONT SEE IT. AND U ASSUME ALL OF US ARE STUPID!!!Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You are too stupid to understand, then you are too stupid, all you need to know had already been posted. -
Originally posted by lagrangian1125:Link them to me then.....show me then...cos WE DONT SEE IT. AND U ASSUME ALL OF US ARE STUPID!!!
-
U NOOB! Dont u think that we do not know what u are trying to do. To promote ur popularity and ur book, u come to sg forum to sensationalize fellow forumnites with ur unreasonable blames to the govt, hoping to gather support and popularities.
However, u failed miserably. Because many here although, in general, unhappy with PAP, have their brains with them.
That is why U failed to convince them with ur flawed logics.
U have degenerated to such a state that ur ability to understand simple posts are questionable.
In short, U are dumb beyond cure. Even IMH wont accept ur level of craziness which can even be use to define a new limit to a mental quantity--- craziness due to self delusion.