Can SG copy Israel 6 day war miracle?
-
1.pl tell us which is your valuable opinions and what quote.Originally posted by Catknight:I wonder who will remember one of the most important events in modern Jewish history? I am afraid that for most of the Jewish world, yet alone the non-Jewish world,this calendar date will lapse with barely a blink.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Daryl Temkin, Ph.D. is the founder and director of the Israel Institute which isdevoted to teaching the historic and spiritual importance of Israel as well as presentingdiscussions concerning contemporary issues confronting the Jewish State and the MiddleEast.
2.wat is your view on if SG can so and so.... -
1.hey dunt turn this to a church gathering.Ok?Originally posted by Catknight:I believe Israel will continue to exist cause G-d make a convenant that the children of israel will inherit that land and no one can take that away..AMEN
-
Read the different versions, but compare with the before and after, who do we believe? Of course the arabs would label the Israel's strike a blatant act of war. But until today, many in the middle east still want Isreal wiped off the map, if the iranian, the iraqi, the palestinians had the means to do so.Originally posted by BillyBong:The above quote was taken from one of the more interesting comdrs from WWII and bears relevance today.
The 6-day war has been written in two versions: one for the world, and one for arabs.
What is easily available to us is the version which indicates that Israel was a beleagued nation being squeezed economically and militarily by a gang iof arab bullies intent on 'wiping Israel off the map' (to quote ahmadinejad's infamous outburst).
That Israel launched a pre-emptive strike was a measure of self defence and so on.
Analysts have stressed in the aftermath that an Anwar Sadat-led Egypt was unlikely to have moved against Israel without provocation; that single act was required to get international backing. Morever, their only real ally, Syria, was less committed into an all out assault, their main interest only lying with the Golan Heights. The 3rd major player - Jordan was in an even less threatening position, with hesitant committment from their leaders regarding any attempt at war.
As for the arab version, i haven't managed to get a reliable copy, but i'm sure it will be a complete reverse of the above version - labelling Israel's strike a blatant act of war.
It would be too late if israel only act after being attacked. -
There were groups in Israel who wanted to expand Israeli frontiers by force.
Arab regimes had to defend themselves also.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_(group) -
Just remember that choosing to believe one piece of misinformation over another piece of misinformation is not the way to arrive at the truth. Looking at whatever facts are available will bring you closer to the truth. Looking at the opinions of people only bring you closer to understanding the people.
-
Sarah really shouldn't have told G-d that she wanted the land of milk and honey .....she should have just accepted what G-D would give her. Who knows...maybe the jews will be oil rich now and Hagar's children will be having milk and honey.
Anyways the middle east is always in a mess. It is always over something they are not happy about. Quarreling half brothers...let them quarrel. -
Frankly, I think the Israelis have every right to defend themselves, and the Arabs have put themselves to shame for putting up a half-pregnant attack. Looking at the odds, 3 vs. 1, do you genuinely think that the Israelis had a chance the moment the first tank clatters across the border? Them being small and a singular party fighting for itself, they do not need to communicate with any external parties and thus their comms. can't be broken, also note that them being themselves, their only strength is that of surprise. They had to deliver the first strike when the Arabs aren't ready as they are still busy trying to sync. the attack. I would say that the Arabs should feel lucky that the Jews didn't nuke them back into the stone age.
-
If they believe in any information, they believe that that information is truth. Who would say that they believe in misinformation. What is fact, myth, or opinion may also be subjective, and even if you were there, you only see the happening from one side, not from all sides.Originally posted by phil30k:Just remember that choosing to believe one piece of misinformation over another piece of misinformation is not the way to arrive at the truth. Looking at whatever facts are available will bring you closer to the truth. Looking at the opinions of people only bring you closer to understanding the people.
It is good to listen to all sides of the stories, before jumping to conclude that what we don't believe are not facts and truths. -
Just one question
Do we have Jews in Singapore?
I know SAF and Mossad/ IDF is tight but its just military coop right?
or is there a significant Jewish presence in Singapore
-
Israel keep winning engagements as they got good military technology. Israel MBTs are better design than the US's MBTs. Furthermore, Israel is smart in using non conventional weapons. nuke/chem/bio weapons were used but still cannot be proven until now. Arabs war stategy is scream and charge, no wonder keep losing