Finally someone in government dare to admit this. Thanks to LKY!
All the while they tried to evade the question. 6.5 million people is not possible.
maybe he said having 5.5 million true-blue singaporeans r enough.
while the 1 million pple will reserve for foreign talents???![]()
Originally posted by 798:maybe he said having 5.5 million true-blue singaporeans r enough.
while the 1 million pple will reserve for foreign talents???
no la the other way round
Originally posted by FBI:no la the other way round
I don't doubt that growth is necessary. I think it's how much sustainable growth that is the issue here.
There was a projected growth target and now that target number is being re-examined. I'm not sure what the information or formulas involved were but I assume these have changed significantly.
Re-examining objectives because the relevant factors may have changed substantially is not a bad thing or a sign of weakness. I'm glad there are people concerned with and monitoring these.
As a citizen, it's more the human cost that's what I'm concerned with.
im from malaysia
Originally posted by HeadHunt:Finally someone in government dare to admit this. Thanks to LKY!
All the while they tried to evade the question. 6.5 million people is not possible.
Please state your source. Otherwise, i wont believe a single word you say. Please be responsible with remarks that you post.
Originally posted by rlsh07:
how can it be then?
Can.. Looking at the rate singaporeans are leaving every year. It's just a matter of time.
Increasing a few more MRT trains during peak periods will help bring these 1-2 million people to work everyday fast and efficiently.
Really. ![]()
Why 5.5 million?
Why not 6 million?
Or 10 million?
Or 3 million?
Or 1 million?
What is the logic?
What is the intent?
What is the aim?
What is the calculation?
Please tell PAP regime.
Usual drivel from PAP regime. Tell people 2 child enough, now this crap.
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:Why 5.5 million?
Why not 6 million?
Or 10 million?
Or 3 million?
Or 1 million?
What is the logic?
What is the intent?
What is the aim?
What is the calculation?
Please tell PAP regime.
Usual drivel from PAP regime. Tell people 2 child enough, now this crap.
It will be the same 20 years from now.
When they see the effects of overpopulation, they will be telling people to stop at 1 or maybe don't even have any kids at all.
And yes, there might be a "No Baby bonus" for couples who choose not to have kids.![]()
at long last that somene admitted our land areas are limited. You can increase cars and population but land is limited.
If some statisticians or economists said we can hold 6.5m or more ppl, beware those staying near the coasts, they will be pushed to the seas ![]()