Today, in the whole of Tibet 7.5 million Chinese settlers have already been sent, outnumbering the Tibetan population of 6 million. In central and western Tibet, now referred to by the Chinese as the "Tibet Autonomous Region",
And I am assuming that you went to count it by urself?????Or your friends did the calculation for you????
Originally posted by Alucard101:OH shame on me?i wud reconsider tht if i were u.
So as per ur assumption since u follow Marco Polo,Singapore is Malaysia?
What killing? Under Dalai’s slavery SERF SYSTEM, Tibetans’ population never grew too much, yet after 1959, the population now is doubled to 2.6 million from 1.2 million under the Serf system. The number speaks itself, what genocide? When infant mortality in you favored Slavery Tibet is 460 per 1000, now is under 35 per 1000.
And I am assuming that you went to count it by urself?????Or your chinese govt friends did the calculation for you????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acHkXqik_Bo
Yawning slogan and fabricating killing number do not make your CIA supported “Gov in-exile” any legal/moral high ground. Less than a quarter million Tibet offspring holding various foreign passports do not represent the Tibet with near 3 million people which is always under Chinese territory over thousands years.
I am not a big fan of CIA either.if that's the case why does Tibeteans want to be free from China?So u still say that 'Tibet under china' and not a chinese provice.
"The population transfer of Chinese into Tibet, which the government in Peking pursues in order to force a "final solution" to the Tibetan problem by reducing the Tibetan population to an insignificant and disenfranchised minority in Tibet itself, must be stopped.
The massive transfer of Chinese civilians into Tibet in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) threatens the very existence of the Tibetans as a distinct people. In the eastern parts of our country, the Chinese now greatly outnumber Tibetans. In the Amdo province, for example, where I was born, there are, according to Chinese statistics, 2.5 million Chinese and only 750,000 Tibetans. Even in so-called Tibet Autonomous Region (i.e., central and western Tibet), Chinese government sources now confirm that Chinese outnumber Tibetans.
The Chinese population transfer policy is not new. It has been systematically applied to other areas before. Earlier in this century, the Manchus were a distinct race with their own culture and traditions. Today only two to three million Manchurians are left in Manchuria, where 75 million Chinese have settled. In Eastern Turkestan, which the Chinese now call Sinkiang, the Chinese population has grown from 200,000 in 1949 to 7 million, more than half of the total population of 13 million. In the wake of the Chinese colonization of Inner Mongolia, Chinese number 8.5 million, Mongols 2.5 million.
Today, in the whole of Tibet 7.5 million Chinese settlers have already been sent, outnumbering the Tibetan population of 6 million. In central and western Tibet, now referred to by the Chinese as the "Tibet Autonomous Region", Chinese sources admit the 1.9 million Tibetans already constitute a minority of the region's population. These numbers do not take the estimated 300,000 - 500,000 troops in Tibet into account - 250,000 of them in the so-called Tibet Autonomous Region. " from
http://www.tibet.com/Proposal/5point.html
And since u are a fan boy of youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxIhqx4xN5w
OH shame on me?i wud reconsider tht if i were u.
So as per ur assumption since u follow Marco Polo,Singapore is Malaysia?
Shame on somebody that persistently ignoring the history and reality, so it’s u or me the rest ppl can make their conscious unbiased judgment.
I no need follow Marco Polo as his travel to China is well documented and widely circulated allover the world.
Yes, Singapore used to be part of Malaya that’s an undeniable fact only shameless/ignorant guy here that everybody already have seen doesn’t know this plaint fact, just like he consistently calls Tibet a country although it never be such sovereign one.
And I am assuming that you went to count it by urself?????Or your chinese govt friends did the calculation for you????
Shame on sbd x2, who is only counting the population by urself?! I no need count by myself, I can count on UN’s figure what actually is more reliable than your fabricated “FACTS” that u fraction so used to it and western media just so casual to pick the junk “facts” produced by u because something to launch the usual attack on Chinese is all what they need.
http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/chinadata/tibet.htm#pop
At the end of 2000, the total population in Tibet was 2.62 million. With diversity in terms of distribution, most people live in rural areas, and fewer in cities and towns. The population of the Tibetan nationality accounts for over 90% of the population, but that of the Han nationality and other ethnic groups is very small. Affected by nature, geographic conditions and climate, 80% of the population in Tibet is distributed mainly over the valley along the middle reaches of the Brahmaputra River valley and the deep valleys along three rivers (Lantsang River, Lujang River and Yangtse River) which are located in the eastern part of Tibet. There are few people in the northern part of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau because of its harsh climate. The southeastern part of Tibet is covered by primeval forests; there population density is low, transportation is inadequate and other conditions unfavorable. In 2000, the population density of Tibet was only 2.1 persons per square kilometer.
I am not a big fan of CIA either.if that's the case why does Tibeteans want to be free from China?So u still say that 'Tibet under china' and not a chinese provice.
U r fundamentally wrong as something against Chinese then u so conveniently read as “ Tibetans want to be free from China” ?? Anti-chinese riots are not uncommon these days. We saw them in Indonesia/South Pacific states/ Africa etc. using ur logic, do all those riots are those nations “want to be freed from China “?? More because of nowadays Chinese domination in business that make the locals uncomfortable, far from ur ideology, dude. Tell me why Tibetan rioters attack Muslim in Lhasa as well? Do the Muslims got anything to do with ur ideology? No, simply because Muslims in Lhasa also dominate some business alongside Han Chinese.
Get some basic straight then start yawning which demonstrated it’s easiest part of job to be done.
Originally posted by Alucard101:Ya and the chinese govt tells the truth always and has never killed any tibetean.
Who the hell asked the chinese to go to tibetean streets to get killed?
And I am betting tht all of u forgot to remember when the chinese shot at monks who went to india and tianmen square and all other times kept under covers.
I thought about 2/3 of tibetan have migrated to neighbouring Chinese province. Should the Chinese start burning Tibetan homes and business, and attack ethnic tibetan.. I mean what are they doing in Chinese Streets en mass.