I'm no fan of white supremacy in USA but let's face it, in current times does a black leadership only for the blacks have what it takes to take America into the next level;?
Obama pastor Wright in his church seems to take an extreme stance in race and American politics..if colored folks do not like White americans take on white nationalism then obama pastor should not harp on black power...2 wrongs doesn't make it right..what do you guys think?
if u reverse the b in obama, wat do you get?
Just as Classical culture spread westward from the Greeks who created it to the Roman peoples who adopted and changed it, so Europe's culture spread westward to the New World, where it was profoundly modified while still remaining basically European.
The central fact of American history is that people of European origin and culture came to occupy and use the immensely rich wilderness between the Atlantic and the Pacific...
...The structure of financial controls created by the tycoons of "Big Banking" and "Big Business" in the period 1880-1933 was of extraordinary complexity, one business fief being built on another, both being allied with semi-independent associates, the whole rearing upward into two pinnacles of economic and financial power, of which one, centered in New York, was headed by J. P. Morgan and Company, and the other, in Ohio, was headed by the Rockefeller family.
When these two cooperated, as they generally did, they could influence the economic life of the country to a large degree and could almost control its political life, at least on the Federal level. The former point can be illustrated by a few facts...
http://real-world-news.org/bk-quigley/02.html#6
The character of any society is determined less by what it is actually like than by the picture it has of itself and of what it aspires to be.
From this point of view, American society of the 1920's was largely middle class. Its values and aspirations were middle class, and power or influence within it was in the hands of middle-class people...
...In American politics we have several parties included under the blanket words "Democratic" and "Republican." In oversimplified terms, as I have said, the Republicans were the party of the middle classes, and the Democrats were the party of the fringes.
Both of these were subdivided, each with a Congressional and a National Party wing. The Republican Congressional Party (representing localism) was much farther to the Right than the National Republican Party, and as such was closer to the petty-bourgeois than to the upper-middle-class outlook. The Democratic Congressional Party was much more clearly of the fringes and minorities (and thus often further to the Left) than the Democratic National Party...
http://real-world-news.org/bk-quigley/20.html#75