Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
But I'll be needing all these arguments next time!
great! now i know you are a PAP infiltrate.
Originally posted by redDUST:great! now i know you are a PAP infiltrate.
To hell with PAP/WP/SDP/and what have you!![]()
to be fair, both of you are right in a way... But although it is not a factor of wage alone, wage still matters. That's why the demand for workers does not vary linearly with wage, but we can still see a downward trend as wages increase
Originally posted by eagle:to be fair, both of you are right in a way... But although it is not a factor of wage alone, wage still matters. That's why the demand for workers does not vary linearly with wage, but we can still see a downward trend as wages increase
Sigh......it's never easy.
This simple answer to this thread is:
You should earn enough to buy a Big Mac Meal for every hour that you work ![]()
Originally posted by Panache1976:This simple answer to this thread is:
You should earn enough to buy a Big Mac Meal for every hour that you work
which implies that there should be a minimum wage. pls be direct the next time.
Originally posted by redDUST:which implies that there should be a minimum wage. pls be direct the next time.
But wasn't that what he implied? And even how much per hour if you need me to explain that?![]()
I know of part time jobs, which just involve counting of cars, paying 6 bucks per hour. Rather brainless job actually... enough to buy a big mac meal...
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
But wasn't that what he implied? And even how much per hour if you need me to explain that?
duh.. weren't you the one who is against min. wage?
what panache76 said is that a person should earn at least that $5.50 or whatever equivalent of that big mac meal for the hour put in. how is that resonates with what you were saying all along?
Originally posted by redDUST:duh.. weren't you the one who is against min. wage?
what panache76 said is that a person should earn at least that $5.50 or whatever equivalent of that big mac meal for the hour put in. how is that resonates with what you were saying all along?
That that's his opinion and he's entitled to it......~?
Originally posted by 16/f/lonely:
That that's his opinion and he's entitled to it......~?
now i get it...
you play the vague games.
Originally posted by redDUST:now i get it...
you play the vague games.
Well, since when are we playing clear clear-cut games?![]()
![]()
Originally posted by walesa:You might need more than just a shrink given your challenged intellect though. What are your links supposed to prove? That minimum wage segregated on the basis of professions exist?
So much for a "creative" novel untested idea that's as feasible as a lunatic's ramblings.
And what's the fuss with the multi-tiered middle income you're advocating? Just because you fall in that tier, this lot deserves additional protection? If this group needs protection in view of the income squeeze, why not go one better and ensure even the richest of the rich are entitled to a safety net that ensures their income gap to those below them also stays intact?
More importantly, who determines which profession should fall into each tier (I presume there're actually "superior" professions, eh?) - you? Why not go further and advocate further "protection" with a more concise minumum wage policies on the basis of gender, nationality, ethnicity, religious persuasion or political affiliation? Maybe you'd like to shed some light on how such a ridiculous idea could be implemented - for all you know, that might just nail you the Nobel Prize if you could put that idea of yours to work and elevate you from your "middle" class status to one that would require no protection.
So what garb are you trying to espouse?
Whew.. even my grandfather wasn't as demented as you.
If you want to keep following people's backside .. I ain't stopping you. That's the easiest way isn't it ? Since you no need to come up with ideas.. just use what's been used and tested... easy peasy.. no need to use your blain. Good for you!!
Ctrl C, Ctrl V !!! hurraH~.. now who's the smartarse who came up with this shyt ?
Sorry dude, if you think the middle income group don't deserve protecting that's your prerogative.
Unfortunately, most of my friends and their parents falls under the middle income group. And looking at the current Singapore's context, they DO need wage protection due to the droves of FT entry.
If you want to argue further .. I suggest you go read up more on minimum wage. It's not a very difficult chapter to understand.
Originally posted by jojobeach:Whew.. even my grandfather wasn't as demented as you.
If you want to keep following people's backside .. I ain't stopping you. That's the easiest way isn't it ? Since you no need to come up with ideas.. just use what's been used and tested... easy peasy.. no need to use your blain. Good for you!!
Sorry dude, if you think the middle income group don't deserve protecting that's your prerogative.
Unfortunately, most of my friends and parents falls under the middle income group. And looking at the current Singapore's context, they DO need wage protection due to the droves of FT entry.
If you want to argue further .. I suggest you go read up more on minimum wage. It's not a very difficult chapter to understand.
huh?
your family lineage has history of psychological problems?
Originally posted by maurizio13:
huh?
your family lineage has history of psychological problems?
Thanks for your MOST constructive input today.
Tomorrow.. we shall teach you how to sing Mary Had A Little Lamb. ![]()
digress: investing 200 a mth for 20 years correctly (at some fund of average 10% per annum), you can get an average of 153.5k sgd after 20 years.
Originally posted by jojobeach:Thanks for your MOST constructive input today.
Tomorrow.. we shall teach you how to sing Mary Had A Little Lamb.
you mentioned your grandpa was demented mah,
i know psychological illness runs in the family.
![]()
Originally posted by maurizio13:
you mentioned your grandpa was demented mah,i know psychological illness runs in the family.
Yah lah.. thanks to you lor. We are cousins mah. You going to Ah mah's house this weekend ? She cooking her famous curry tofu leh.
Originally posted by jojobeach:Whew.. even my grandfather wasn't as demented as you.
If you want to keep following people's backside .. I ain't stopping you. That's the easiest way isn't it ? Since you no need to come up with ideas.. just use what's been used and tested... easy peasy.. no need to use your blain. Good for you!!
Ctrl C, Ctrl V !!! hurraH~.. now who's the smartarse who came up with this shyt ?
Sorry dude, if you think the middle income group don't deserve protecting that's your prerogative.
Unfortunately, most of my friends and their parents falls under the middle income group. And looking at the current Singapore's context, they DO need wage protection due to the droves of FT entry.
If you want to argue further .. I suggest you go read up more on minimum wage. It's not a very difficult chapter to understand.
Of course your grandpa isn't as demented - anyone with an IQ that rivals yours must be one in a million!
For any lunatic to conjure up "creative" ideas in the mould of the insane would just about fit your idiosyncracies...
Who gives a damn if your family and parents fall under the middle income group? What prerogative or urgency should your family or parents warrant more than others who are marginalised on the basis of gender, ethnicity, nationality or other factors beyond their control? The fact no minimum wage policy is in place to exclusively protect a particular group marginalised just about sums up the viability of your proposal - if you can't live with the thought of a hapless idea being dissed, then tough! All said and done, perhaps you could shed some light on how you could put your idea into practice though? So done any internet search to that end?
Come back and talk about minimum wage when you've figured what it actually seeks to protect.
Originally posted by walesa:
Of course your grandpa isn't as demented - anyone with an IQ that rivals yours must be one in a million!For any lunatic to conjure up "creative" ideas in the mould of the insane would just about fit your idiosyncracies...
Who gives a damn if your family and parents fall under the middle income group? What prerogative or urgency should your family or parents warrant more than others who are marginalised on the basis of gender, ethnicity, nationality or other factors beyond their control? The fact no minimum wage policy is in place to exclusively protect a particular group marginalised just about sums up the viability of your proposal - if you can't live with the thought of a hapless idea being dissed, then tough! All said and done, perhaps you could shed some light on how you could put your idea into practice though? So done any internet search to that end?
Come back and talk about minimum wage when you've figured what it actually seeks to protect.
Tsk tsk..
We are discussing minimum wage here.
If you want to discuss discrimination on "gender, ethnicity, nationality or other factors beyond their control"
You may want to consider a topic under " Equal Opportunity Employment Act".
Right now..there's none in Singapore.. in USof A. It's in effect.
So please do us a favor and don't lump it all together.
Like I said... there's a whole lot more Singapore Gahmen can do to protect her citizens but.. they're not doing enuff..
Since you are such an expert.. I'd LOVE to see what idea you can come up with to protect wages of SGreans getting further depressed by the FT policy.
Originally posted by jojobeach:Tsk tsk..
We are discussing minimum wage here.
If you want to discuss discrimination on "gender, ethnicity, nationality or other factors beyond their control"
You may want to consider a topic under " Equal Opportunity Employment Act".
Right now..there's none in Singapore.. in USof A. It's in effect.
So please do us a favor and don't lump it all together.
Like I said... there's a whole lot more Singapore Gahmen can do to protect her citizens but.. they're not doing enuff..
Since you are such an expert.. I'd LOVE to see what idea you can come up with to protect wages of SGreans getting further depressed by the FT policy.
Look who's talking! Are you talking about minimum wage or micro version of minimum wage that selectively targets specific groups (which is non-existent to begin with)? Or are you simply re-defining minimum wage?
So is minimum wage supposed to reduce social inequity or further accentuate it just so that a certain middle-income group could live more comfortably? Surely, if the middle-income feel marginalized on the basis of their social strata, there're tonnes more marginalized groups that too should be granted special dispensation for a brand of minimum wage that hands them an advantage!
Back to your hapless shrills about what goes on in the US, save yourself the trouble of further embarrassment with blatant assertions that are, at best, incoherent. Alternatively, we could always discuss US issues in another thread.
Back to the point about this regime. At no point did I ever insinuate or suggest the social safety net here is adequate and fairly equitable, did I? That said, it's equally laughable to suggest tweaking the fundamental principles of minimum wage (which doesn't even exist to begin with in this regime) would actually address the FT issue. Or are you that dense you can't actually tell labour and immigration issues are two separate entities for which there is no direct correlation?
So what's your bone of contention, really? Your inability to comprehend the function of minimum wage legislations or your delusions with having trouble reconciling the minimum wage with the woefully lamentable immigration policies of your beloved regime (all in the name of self-interest)?
Originally posted by walesa:
Look who's talking! Are you talking about minimum wage or micro version of minimum wage that selectively targets specific groups (which is non-existent to begin with)? Or are you simply re-defining minimum wage?
So is minimum wage supposed to reduce social inequity or further accentuate it just so that a certain middle-income group could live more comfortably? Surely, if the middle-income feel marginalized on the basis of their social strata, there're tonnes more marginalized groups that too should be granted special dispensation for a brand of minimum wage that hands them an advantage!
Back to your hapless shrills about what goes on in the US, save yourself the trouble of further embarrassment with blatant assertions that are, at best, incoherent. Alternatively, we could always discuss US issues in another thread.
Back to the point about this regime. At no point did I ever insinuate or suggest the social safety net here is adequate and fairly equitable, did I? That said, it's equally laughable to suggest tweaking the fundamental principles of minimum wage (which doesn't even exist to begin with in this regime) would actually address the FT issue. Or are you that dense you can't actually tell labour and immigration issues are two separate entities for which there is no direct correlation?
So what's your bone of contention, really? Your inability to comprehend the function of minimum wage legislations or your delusions with having trouble reconciling the minimum wage with the woefully lamentable immigration policies of your beloved regime (all in the name of self-interest)?
Har ? So this is your solution ah ??? Clap Clap Clap..~
Wait.. what is this ?.. An empty shell ? IF you doono.. say you donno.. lah !!!
Since when I suggest minimum wage should be exclusively for the middle income group ??????? Geessh... get your sail straight will ya ?
FYI..I never supported the Open Door policy ok ?
Wah lau... stubborn old man... just like LKY !
So what exactly is your stand on this minimum wage thing ?
Are you for , or against ?
Originally posted by jojobeach:Har ? So this is your solution ah ??? Clap Clap Clap..~
Wait.. what is this ?.. An empty shell ? IF you doono.. say you donno.. lah !!!
Since when I suggest minimum wage should be exclusively for the middle income group ??????? Geessh... get your sail straight will ya ?
FYI..I never supported the Open Door policy ok ?
Wah lau... stubborn old man... just like LKY !
What the hell do you know? I'm still waiting for you to espouse sense - or at the very least, lend some credibility to your drivel which is akin to sandcastles built in the air. So have you found any semblance of the brand of multi-tiered minimum wage you advocate?
Then again, are you that dense you are incapable of separating what I said and what you think I said? You'd do well to set your head straight...
Originally posted by walesa:What the hell do you know? I'm still waiting for you to espouse sense - or at the very least, lend some credibility to your drivel which is akin to sandcastles built in the air. So have you found any semblance of the brand of multi-tiered minimum wage you advocate?
Then again, are you that dense you are incapable of separating what I said and what you think I said? You'd do well to set your head straight...
So what exactly is your stand on this minimum wage thing ?
Are you for , or against ?
And what is wrong with taking what other countries had successfully implemented , tweak it a little to give a broader coverage and adapt it into SG's uniqe landscape ?
If you think this discussion is merely building sandcastles in the air.. then may I know why are you here posting your Anti-Despots messages for ? Arn't you ALSO essentially just building sandcastles in the air ?
Your 'DO as I say, Not as I do".. attitude is really.. PAP you know ??
Originally posted by jojobeach:So what exactly is your stand on this minimum wage thing ?
Are you for , or against ?
And what is wrong with taking what other countries had successfully implemented , tweak it a little to give a broader coverage and adapt it into SG's uniqe landscape ?
If you think this discussion is merely building sandcastles in the air.. then may I know why are you here posting your Anti-Despots messages for ? Arn't you ALSO essentially just building sandcastles in the air ?
Your 'DO as I say, Not as I do".. attitude is really.. PAP you know ??
Are you ignorant or simply foolhardy? Just because I allegedly "ridiculed" your idea does not in any way suggest I'm against minimum wage, does it?
To drive home my message to someone obscenely dense : I think your idea of a multi-tiered minimum wage policy is both unfeasible and working against the principles minimum wage is supposed to serve. In short, the brand of multi-tiered minimum wage actually does more to accentuate social inequity than narrow the income gap. That said, I am all for minimum wage (the brand you see worldwide - whether it works and how effective it is are an entirely separatematter). Period. Sharp and concise. Does that answer your question? (For the record, I belong neither to the middle nor lower income strata in the strictest demographic definition churned out by the regime's statistics, but the point about having minimum wage to reduce social inequity isn't lost on me)
As for your point, I was questioning the viability of your "creative" suggestion - at which point did I assert my idea (when I never even mentioned one) to be right and absolute? How you liken my "attitude" to this regime is beyond me - if anything, I find it perplexing you find your views absolute and untouchable (so who's behaving like the infamous regime now?)...