Lees ready to b X-exaimned.''Dr Chee,what r u waiting for?''
-
This is amusing, someone who actually talks to himself.
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
If Chee is made to look like a Pussy, you have been exposed as Gazelle the panty sniffing conman - out again to roam the Speakers' Corner with a new nick.Does anyone with a right thinking mind need any persuasion to see the obvious truth in the manner that T.T. Durai manages his empire by threats and deceit when anyone question him and his operations ?
Based on his perception of the slightest hint of perjury to his honesty - he will resort to the Courts to defend his precious position, in case the truth does spill out.
Unfortunately, he forgot that he is only the God Father at NKF, and not Singapore - the shoes did not fit his feet, but surely fitted his pompous head.
Are you believing yourself to be able to think for your God Father and that his shoes fit you too ? Unfortunately, the shoes are still to big to fit your head and your feet.
Atobe, if you claim to know so much "FACTS" about it, I am just curious why you are not representing Dr. Chee is defending the case?
Talk is cheap dude, especially more so when you are faceless and you dont have to be accountable for what you said.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
This is amusing, someone who actually talks to himself.
It is even more amusing when some sheep still believe he is smart. -
Somebody here has MPD.
-
Originally posted by Aelop:
Atobe, if you claim to know so much "FACTS" about it, I am just curious why you are not representing Dr. Chee is defending the case?
Talk is cheap dude, especially more so when you are faceless and you dont have to be accountable for what you said.
An acknowledgement from Gazelle - the reknown panty sniffer.If J.B. Jeyaratnam cannot even be allowed time to represent CSJ at the last minute, is there any use if I were to offer my services ?
Surely, you should know that only licensed counsels are allowed to practise in the Singapore Courts ?
Is this not a public forum, and exchange of argument and debate takes place ?
Is there any substance that you have that will rebut my position taken ?
If not, is this the best you can do to silence any opposing views of the current worrisome events in the Singapore Judiciary System - that allow anyone to barge into the Court when it is midway in session ?
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
An acknowledgement from Gazelle - the reknown panty sniffer.If J.B. Jeyaratnam cannot even be allowed time to represent CSJ at the last minute, is there any use if I were to offer my services ?
Surely, you should know that only licensed counsels are allowed to practise in the Singapore Courts ?
Is this not a public forum, and exchange of argument and debate takes place ?
Is there any substance that you have that will rebut my position taken ?
If not, is this the best you can do to silence any opposing views of the current worrisome events in the Singapore Judiciary System - that allow anyone to barge into the Court when it is midway in session ?
If J.B. Jeyaratnam cannot even be allowed time to represent CSJ at the last minuteAnother lie! Damn you, Asswipe Atobe, how many heads do you want to drag down to the pits with your unsubstantiated statements which is only thrash fit for fools? The truth was JB disengage himself last minute, as reported. Are you claiming now the media lied?
-
Originally posted by Aelop:
It is even more amusing when some sheep still believe he is smart.
No worries Aelop. Sometimes when they have no evidences, they will resort to lies, such as you and i are the same person. This is the way some despicable persons work. Nothing smart in it. They can't just handle the truth. More so when there are more people who attempt to shed light to them. Sheep are sheeps. -
Originally posted by Atobe:
An acknowledgement from Gazelle - the reknown panty sniffer.If J.B. Jeyaratnam cannot even be allowed time to represent CSJ at the last minute, is there any use if I were to offer my services ?
Surely, you should know that only licensed counsels are allowed to practise in the Singapore Courts ?
Is this not a public forum, and exchange of argument and debate takes place ?
Is there any substance that you have that will rebut my position taken ?
If not, is this the best you can do to silence any opposing views of the current worrisome events in the Singapore Judiciary System - that allow anyone to barge into the Court when it is midway in session ?
If you have what it takes to defend CSJ in this case, why dont you volunteer yourself to SDP as an advisor for Dr. Chee who is representing himself in court, instead of giving stupid excuses just to make yourself look like a HERO in this forum?
Atobe, To me, you are just an armchair critic firing in all cylinders and thank God that the majority of the forumers here are not dumb and stupid to believe what you said.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
This is amusing, someone who actually talks to himself.
omg.. it's really the same person.. -
Originally posted by Point_blank:
If J.B. Jeyaratnam cannot even be allowed time to represent CSJ at the last minuteAnother lie! Damn you, Asswipe Atobe, how many heads do you want to drag down to the pits with your unsubstantiated statements which is only thrash fit for fools? The truth was JB disengage himself last minute, as reported. Are you claiming now the media lied?
Now you are lying with your 'Point_blank' opinion.
Did you not read even the Straits Times or listen to CNA - if you cannot even bear to watch it on TV ?
Did JBJ disengage himself last minute, or was it CSJ asking him to move aside after Judge Belinda Ang refused JBJ any extra time to study the papers that he had received on the morning before he turned up in Court ?
Did the media lied, or did you prefer to read, or hear, or watch that part of the details that you find palatable to your 'Point_blank' abilities to absorb anything ?
Surely this prove yourself to be as reckless with your opinion as you claim CSJ to be in his public conduct ?
-
Originally posted by purpledragon84:
omg.. it's really the same person..when you are a sheep, you are not allowed to question other sheep. You just follow.
-
shh..
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Now you are lying with your 'Point_blank' opinion.
Did you not read even the Straits Times or listen to CNA - if you cannot even bear to watch it on TV ?
Did JBJ disengage himself last minute, or was it CSJ asking him to move aside after Judge Belinda Ang refused JBJ any extra time to study the papers that he had received on the morning before he turned up in Court ?
Did the media lied, or did you prefer to read, or hear, or watch that part of the details that you find palatable to your 'Point_blank' abilities to absorb anything ?
Surely this prove yourself to be as reckless with your opinion as you claim CSJ to be in his public conduct ?
was it CSJ asking him to move aside after Judge Belinda Ang refused JBJ any extra time to study the papers that he had received on the morning before he turned up in Court ?Ah... backpeddling from your first reckless allegation now?
If J.B. Jeyaratnam cannot even be allowed time to represent CSJ at the last minute. So who do you want others to think it was - the judge who removed JBJ or CSJ who remove him now?
-
Originally posted by purpledragon84:
omg.. it's really the same person..
I wasn't even mentioning about him, I wonder why he owned up.Was he guilty conscious?
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
I wasn't even mentioning about him, I wonder why he owned up.Was he guilty conscious?
heart knows stomach understands
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
I wasn't even mentioning about him, I wonder why he owned up.Was he guilty conscious?
just observe below.. one appear, the other gone, and vice versa.. and it happens very frequently.. when both online, means server lag for dat while nia.. after that refresh, back to one person only..well now that i say it out maybe he's gonna switch on two comps.. i duno..
-
Originally posted by Point_blank:
was it CSJ asking him to move aside after Judge Belinda Ang refused JBJ any extra time to study the papers that he had received on the morning before he turned up in Court ?Ah... backpeddling from your first reckless allegation now?
If J.B. Jeyaratnam cannot even be allowed time to represent CSJ at the last minute. So who do you want others to think it was - the judge who removed JBJ or CSJ who remove him now?
How marvellous to note that your repeated claims about my abilities to twist words, have now revealed that you are more artful in twisting whole statements to suit your own "Point_blank" ways of arguing your position ?
Are you now back peddling on your previous position that it was a lie that I said that "JBJ was not allowed time to represent CSJ" ?
What is it that you are disputing now ?
Is that no longer a lie ?
Or are you now disputing the fact that Judge Belinda Ang dismiss JBJ or if it was CSJ that dismiss him ?
In your 'Point_blank' state of anxiety to score a point over my arguments - are you able to understand the "cause-and-effect to the natural flow of events" ?
There is even a difference between "murder and man-slaughter'' - can you even understand the circumstance that led to CSJ asking JBJ to step aside ?
Have a little patience and clarity in your thoughts, instead of acting like a petulant juvenile when deluded with the sight of a lollipop, and you may just get to score one little point to add to your 'Point_blank' score card.
-
Originally posted by purpledragon84:
just observe below.. one appear, the other gone, and vice versa.. and it happens very frequently.. when both online, means server lag for dat while nia.. after that refresh, back to one person only..well now that i say it out maybe he's gonna switch on two comps.. i duno..
me just eating popcorn and watching show from the sidelines -
Originally posted by Atobe:
How marvellous to note that your repeated claims about my abilities to twist words, have now revealed that you are more artful in twisting whole statements to suit your own "Point_blank" ways of arguing your position ?
Are you now back peddling on your previous position that it was a lie that I said that "JBJ was not allowed time to represent CSJ" ?
What is it that you are disputing now ?
Is that no longer a lie ?
Or are you now disputing the fact that Judge Belinda Ang dismiss JBJ or if it was CSJ that dismiss him ?
In your 'Point_blank' state of anxiety to score a point over my arguments - are you able to understand the "cause-and-effect to the natural flow of events" ?
There is even a difference between "murder and man-slaughter'' - can you even understand the circumstance that led to CSJ asking JBJ to step aside ?
Have a little patience and clarity in your thoughts, instead of acting like a petulant juvenile when deluded with the sight of a lollipop, and you may just get to score one little point to add to your 'Point_blank' score card.
Cut through your crap, word whore, i am asking you now, who do you want others to think it was - the judge who removed JBJ or CSJ who remove him now? -
All I can say about the Chees is that they got 'balls'
-
Originally posted by Point_blank:
Cut through your crap, word whore, i am asking you now, who do you want others to think it was - the judge who removed JBJ or CSJ who remove him now?
That is the trouble with the mind of a juvenile, more so when the juvenile has a 'Point_blank' mind to start with.Have you answered my first question - if what has been said is a lie ?
Or are you attempting to be a party to a lie by engaging in this debate to promote what you have claimed to be a lie ?
If you believe that it is not a lie, can you first understand or appreciate what had transpired before CSJ asked JBJ to step aside ?
Who created the circumstance or cause for CSJ to tell JBJ to step aside ?
Even the husband was convicted of murder, when he instigated a young boy to murder his wife - as he was the instigator and the cause that made the act possible.
Surely, a learned mind able to spell out vulgar words with such accuracy cannot possibly be continuously in a state of being 'Point_blank' ?
It pains everyone who maybe your ardent supporters, and will be unable to soothe your ego.
Juveniles always have misplaced ego, and fat hopes.
-
Originally posted by Short Ninja:
All I can say about the Chees is that they got 'balls'
he got balls too.
-
Originally posted by purpledragon84:
just observe below.. one appear, the other gone, and vice versa.. and it happens very frequently.. when both online, means server lag for dat while nia.. after that refresh, back to one person only..well now that i say it out maybe he's gonna switch on two comps.. i duno..
If you realised, they start trolling around the same time in the morning, and stop at around the same time at ngiht.Anyway, only computer dumbos need to log on and off to handle 2 accounts. There are extremely easy ways to log on 2 accounts at the same time (while telling the server it is also 2 different IPs).
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
I wasn't even mentioning about him, I wonder why he owned up.Was he guilty conscious?
It isn't new. We have seen Chinkara, Gutturosa and Mammalia talking among themselves in another thread before.Everyone has also seen Love Supreme and Gazelle talking to each other before too.
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
That is the trouble with the mind of a juvenile, more so when the juvenile has a 'Point_blank' mind to start with.Have you answered my first question - if what has been said is a lie ?
Or are you attempting to be a party to a lie by engaging in this debate to promote what you have claimed to be a lie ?
If you believe that it is not a lie, can you first understand or appreciate what had transpired before CSJ asked JBJ to step aside ?
Who created the circumstance or cause for CSJ to tell JBJ to step aside ?
Even the husband was convicted of murder, when he instigated a young boy to murder his wife - as he was the instigator and the cause that made the act possible.
Surely, a learned mind able to spell out vulgar words with such accuracy cannot possibly be continuously in a state of being 'Point_blank' ?
It pains everyone who maybe your ardent supporters, and will be unable to soothe your ego.
Juveniles always have misplaced ego, and fat hopes.
Asswipe Atobe, as usual with your style - allege and when ask for evidences to back up your facts, your wiggle your way and run by smearing and cover ups. I doubt if i would get any straight answers from you anymore, for you had been proven craven, a liar, and a trouble maker to society.
May fools find you a comfort.
Should you wish to engage with me again or prove yourself otherwise to regain your credibility, back up these statements.
1. Cut through your crap, word whore, i am asking you now, who do you want others to think it was - the judge who removed JBJ or CSJ who remove him now?In case you thought i had forgotten, fat hope, asswipe!
2. Now, you claimed - when half of his affidavit of evidence were blocked from being presented before the trial even started. Were they evidence RELATED TO THE NKF case? If so, would you like to show it?
3. You asked - why were these questions not publicised in the papers. Do newspapers, even international media ones less the cheesy tabloids, see fit to print irrelevant questions asked in the whole?