CHINA : Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew says the attorney-general's decision not to prosecute Workers' Party member James Gomez does not make him less of a liar or less dishonest.
In a statement released from China, where he is currently on a visit, Mr Lee reiterated what he had called Mr Gomez earlier.
The Minister Mentor had said that Mr Gomez was a liar and dishonest and that Workers' Party chairman Sylvia Lim and the party secretary-general Low Thia Khiang did not act honourably by shielding him.
Mr Lee added that if Mr Gomez claims he is not a liar nor dishonest, he can go to court to clear his name.
Earlier on Friday, Mr Gomez had been let off with a stern warning for threatening an Elections Department officer, ending a three week long saga.
Investigations by police started after a complaint by the Elections Department against Mr Gomez on May 6.
|
Police said that after reviewing the evidence, the Public Prosecutor was satisfied that Mr Gomez had used threatening words towards a public servant.
He could have been fined up to $5,000 or jailed up to one year.
But police decided it would let Mr Gomez go with a warning instead, as he had been cooperative and had not committed any previous criminal offences.
The saga revolved around Mr Gomez's claim that he had applied for a minority candidate certificate at the Elections Department before the May 6 General Election.
Security camera footage from the Elections Department later showed that he did not submit the application form but instead put it into his bag.
Mr Gomez subsequently admitted he did not hand in the form and apologised, saying he was distracted.
But People's Action Party leaders found his apology inadequate and accused him of lying and trying to discredit the Elections Department.
"It is in the AG's authority to exercise his discretion, but his decision not to prosecute does not, in any way, make James Gomez less of a liar or less dishonest. I reiterate what I have called him, a liar and dishonest, and that Ms Sylvia Lim and Mr Low Thia Khiang did not act honourably by shielding him. If Gomez claims he is not a liar nor dishonest, he can go to court to clear his name," said Mr Lee in his statement.
wah lao eh.. u want to invite andrewyap come here dishonor dishonor again la u..
After all the GRC and suing of political oppositions so very few stand for election.
If he has the interest of Singapore at heart, he should remove the GRC and get real and encourage more Gomez to come forward to stand for election to give his million-dollar ministers a good run for the million dollars paid.
If some Gomez fumbles on filling or submission of nomination forms instruct election office to treat such form as technicality and help if necessary Gomez or Ah Pek to fill and submit the form properly and let him stand for election.
This should have been his leadership if he claims to have leadership to guide a country like this from third world of fighting brothers and sisters to one of promoting participation in governing the country.
Only when we have such a leader of broad-mindedness and magnanimity will I see a great leader which has led this country from third world to first world. If not we are only a third world country.
After the Jame gomez incident, i have reservation when MM calls someone a liar or dishonest. Could the victicm be another James Gomez?After all we have such a credible press that can give fair and unbiased coverage of MM's political opponents.
In this climate of fear, its no wonder good candidates for elections would prefer to watch from the sidelines.Afterall who wants to be "fixed" by LHL?
Originally posted by robertteh:After all the GRC and suing of political oppositions so very few stand for election.
If he has the interest of Singapore at heart, he should remove the GRC and get real and encourage more Gomez to come forward to stand for election to give his million-dollar ministers a good run for the million dollars paid.
If some Gomez fumbles on filling or submission of nomination forms instruct election office to treat such form as technicality and help if necessary Gomez or Ah Pek to fill and submit the form properly and let him stand for election.
This should have been his leadership if he claims to have leadership to guide a country like this from third world of fighting brothers and sisters to one of promoting participation in governing the country.
Only when we have such a leader of broad-mindedness and magnanimity will I see a great leader which has led this country from third world to first world. If not we are only a third world country.
'If some Gomez fumbles on filling or submission of nomination forms'
Good lord!...is this how you would excuse dishonesty - fumbles? More so on someone who seeks to handle our dailyaffairs for a 5 year term? This isn't about braodmindedness, this is about utter stupidity and naivety of trust! Which fantasy MMPG are you living in?
This is for people who dont understand the meaning of dishonesty.
dis·hon·est
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dishonest
| 1. | not honest; disposed to lie, cheat, or steal; not worthy of trust or belief: a dishonest person. |
One must have clairvoyance to be able to infer a person is disposed to lie, cheat, or steal over the fumbling of a form
fool me once, shame on you
fool me twice, shame on me...
Gomez is better off staying the hell away from the WP.. and the WP would do well to throw the guy out and never allow him to darken their doorway ever again...
that being said, i still think the biggest liar around is in the MIW.. i refer to him as Mabok Tongue ![]()
Originally posted by kilua:This is for people who dont understand the meaning of dishonesty.
dis·hon·est
![]()
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dishonest
1. not honest; disposed to lie, cheat, or steal; not worthy of trust or belief: a dishonest person.
One must have clairvoyance to be able to infer a person is disposed to lie, cheat, or steal over the fumbling of a form
For those who don't understand evidence of dishonesty and cheating:-
"Security camera footage from the Elections Department later showed that he did not submit the application form but instead put it into his bag.
Mr Gomez subsequently admitted he did not hand in the form and apologised, saying he was distracted."
More detailed account:-
April 24, Mr Gomez, accompanied by Worker's Party Chairman Slyvia Lim and filmed by media cameras, filled up the minority certificate to run in the Constituency.
After being left alone by the cameras and his Chairman, however, he was shown (through CCTV footage) to have kept the forms in an envelope in his bag and left the building without submitting it.April 26, 2006, James Gomez called the elections department to enquire about the status of the form, but was indignant that the board had not received the form.
He subsequently reminded the ELD officer of the "consequences" of misplacing his form, pointing to the CCTV nearby.April 27,2006, the elections department confirmed through CCTV that Mr James Gomez did not submit a "minority-race candidate application form", despite claiming on the eve of Nomination Day that he had done so."
1. Why go to the Elections Department if not to apply and then hand in the form? Distracted by what? The female staff?
2. Why threaten ELD officer of 'consequences' and then make a big hoohah to others when he quietly did a con job?
3. It was, as the CCTV had shown, no 'fumble' but pure attempt to cheat. If next time you catch a pick pocket stealing your wallet, you better let him go, cause he was just 'fumbling' your back pocket.
I am not sure whether the date of the news on the first post was 'unintentionally or intentionally' left out. After years, even MM Lee had let the issue died down, MP Low TH still in office, so what's this 'accountability' some people are asking for the removal of DPM Wong?
Point_blank,
Please define dishonesty or lies in Singapore context. Who dictates lies, cheats, dishonesty ? Is such standards set by the judge or the court or is it set by the power that be in all the political defamation suits. Just play back the tapes please.
It was a honest mistake.
Originally posted by robertteh:Point_blank,
Please define dishonesty or lies in Singapore context. Who dictates lies, cheats, dishonesty ? Is such standards set by the judge or the court or is it set by the power that be in all the political defamation suits. Just play back the tapes please.
Are there differences in moral standards?!!! Have you lost yours??? While there is no perfection, there is still a minimum standard and if you think slimey james is of good moral character, then i certainly dare not imagine you at your worst!
point_blank, what about notorious Cheng San GRC incident?
http://www.singapore-window.org/0715st.htm
http://www.singapore-window.org/ag0721.htm
This statement still makes me laugh:
11. Plainly, a person inside a polling station cannot be said to be within a radius of 200 metres of a polling station.
Kangaroo court?
Poh, this thread is about Slimey james. Rather than to tell you off about the relevance of your case to that of slimey's, i will instead let you differentiate yourself between the 2.
What Slimey james had done was nothing more than an attempt to smear the ruling party through underhand means. It was to show that he did go the election office to register his application for candidacy.
And then to claim that he was denied the chance to run should the election department claims there was no entry of his application - implying that the election department are at fraud, which was why he cunningly stuff that application form into his bag instead of submitting it.
Fortunately, CCTV cameras caught his act red-handed. This is no honest or simple mistake, but a deliberate act to undermine our elections and trust in the election department.
Personally, i may forgive him over time for the cheating, for i am a rational and forgiving person, BUT I CANNOT FORGIVE HIM FOR ATTEMPTING TO SACRIFICE THE ELD OFFICER FOR HIS OWN PERSONAL MOTIVE TO GET SYMPATHY AND ELECTED!
Can you imagine what would have had happened if there were no CCTV evidence? The ELD officer, our fellow Singaporean, would be accountable and charged, and would be made out of job, not of his fault, but by the con artiste Slimey james.
Already, even before he begins his public career, he had proven his craveness and readiness to sacrifice others for his own personal gains, what more will happen when fools elect him or like some now, still protecting his memory?
Some here claim the ruling party of wrong-doings, fraud and all kinds of allegations without evidences, some even years back, yet here is one outright fraud caught on camera, with real life at stake, they would rather turn a blind eye. Have we all lost sight of truth and reality?
point_blank, what is your opinion on Cheng San GRC incident?
let's move on.
Yes.
"Let's move on."
This phrase has got to make it into wiki some day.
Just like "Get out of my elite uncaring face" ![]()
Why MM Lee in China suddenly think of James Gomez?
Originally posted by Point_blank:
Are there differences in moral standards?!!! Have you lost yours??? While there is no perfection, there is still a minimum standard and if you think slimey james is of good moral character, then i certainly dare not imagine you at your worst!
Point_blank,
You failed to reply me and went on to condemn Gomez as slimy. If Gomez is prevented to stand for election by GRC or defamation suits of this kind we are seeing here then who is more slimy?
MM lee trying to stir up a storm in a teacup....again ![]()
Lee Kuan Yew will make big noise about others to bring them down, but if others try to do the same to him, he will sue.
He is like a shitty old rat.
james gomez is a trouble maker, albeit a not so smart one.
one only has to dig a little deeper on the fiasco he created at nussu during his student days at nus to know the (sinister) charactor of the person he is. i was there in person to witness it.
when LTK announced james's candidacy at the last election, i knew at the instance it is a big mistake. james's foolhardiness later confirms it.
Originally posted by Point_blank:For those who don't understand evidence of dishonesty and cheating:-
"Security camera footage from the Elections Department later showed that he did not submit the application form but instead put it into his bag.
Mr Gomez subsequently admitted he did not hand in the form and apologised, saying he was distracted."
More detailed account:-
April 24, Mr Gomez, accompanied by Worker's Party Chairman Slyvia Lim and filmed by media cameras, filled up the minority certificate to run in the Constituency.
After being left alone by the cameras and his Chairman, however, he was shown (through CCTV footage) to have kept the forms in an envelope in his bag and left the building without submitting it.April 26, 2006, James Gomez called the elections department to enquire about the status of the form, but was indignant that the board had not received the form.
He subsequently reminded the ELD officer of the "consequences" of misplacing his form, pointing to the CCTV nearby.April 27,2006, the elections department confirmed through CCTV that Mr James Gomez did not submit a "minority-race candidate application form", despite claiming on the eve of Nomination Day that he had done so."
1. Why go to the Elections Department if not to apply and then hand in the form? Distracted by what? The female staff?
2. Why threaten ELD officer of 'consequences' and then make a big hoohah to others when he quietly did a con job?
3. It was, as the CCTV had shown, no 'fumble' but pure attempt to cheat. If next time you catch a pick pocket stealing your wallet, you better let him go, cause he was just 'fumbling' your back pocket.
I am not sure whether the date of the news on the first post was 'unintentionally or intentionally' left out. After years, even MM Lee had let the issue died down, MP Low TH still in office, so what's this 'accountability' some people are asking for the removal of DPM Wong?
Did you review the CCTV footage, or were you depending on what was reported ?
How do you know what transpired from the time everyone were present facing each other at the counter - the ELD official or officials with James Gomez and Sylvia Lim - until the point that no one was there that got James Gomez to place the forms in the envelope, then the envelope into his attached case ?
What were the events during that moment that caused the distraction, and which got everyone away - leaving James alone ?
Was the footage replayed with the recorded sound, or was the recorded sound turned off and viewers attention was led through the footage by a "voice over guide" ?
What gain can James Gomez acheive by messing up his nomination papers - surely not to create a situation that he cannot stand for election ?
Why should the word ''consequences" be viewed as a threat ?
How do you infer from a CCTV footage the intention of a person to cheat ?
The act of robbery with a gun captured on CCTV is obvious - how does your ingenius mind infer from a CCTV footage the intent of a person ?
LKY did criticis Sylvia Lim and Low Thia Kiang for suggesting that ''we should move on after James Gomez had offered an apology'' - yet LKY demanded that the WP leadership should do more than just to allow James Gomez to apologise and propose for Singapore to "move on".
Is Wong Kan Seng's responsibility not greater in the complacent manner of sheer over confidence that his Home Affairs Ministry is managed - which resulted in the escape of Mas Selamat Kastari ?
Surely, MSK escape is more damaging to Singapore's security and reputation than James Gomez accusation of inefficiency at the ELD ?
It was LKY's public statement that Singaporeans should learn from the Japanese ways in which the Leadership accepts accountability for the mishaps of their subordinates.
Unfortunately, his comments were intended for Singaporeans to follow, and not to be applied to himself or his own.
Has LKY never make a mistake in his life time that he wished he had never made ?
Surely his error of judgment in laughing at Chiam See Tong's O-Level Grade at a noon time Election Rally at Fullerton Square was one of a few such gaffs that he has made in his 50 odd years as a politician ?
Did he ever make a public apology to his insulting comments towards all the O-Level Singaporeans - insinuating that they cannot be compared to the talents similar to his breed of University educated genes ?
politics is never about playing fair...
do you think when the opposition gets to be the government, they won't play dirty tricks?? no government in power will make the playing field level.. it's dumb....
this is not to say i approve of PAP's actions.. but this is the way of politics...
how do you think George Bush Jr. got to be president the first time round?? it's all cos his little brother managed to gift the state of Florida to him....
Originally posted by Atobe:Did you review the CCTV footage, or were you depending on what was reported ?
How do you know what transpired from the time everyone were present facing each other at the counter - the ELD official or officials with James Gomez and Sylvia Lim - until the point that no one was there that got James Gomez to place the forms in the envelope, then the envelope into his attached case ?
What were the events during that moment that caused the distraction, and which got everyone away - leaving James alone ?
Was the footage replayed with the recorded sound, or was the recorded sound turned off and viewers attention was led through the footage by a "voice over guide" ?
What gain can James Gomez acheive by messing up his nomination papers - surely not to create a situation that he cannot stand for election ?
Why should the word ''consequences" be viewed as a threat ?
How do you infer from a CCTV footage the intention of a person to cheat ?
The act of robbery with a gun captured on CCTV is obvious - how does your ingenius mind infer from a CCTV footage the intent of a person ?
LKY did criticis Sylvia Lim and Low Thia Kiang for suggesting that ''we should move on after James Gomez had offered an apology'' - yet LKY demanded that the WP leadership should do more than just to allow James Gomez to apologise and propose for Singapore to "move on".
Is Wong Kan Seng's responsibility not greater in the complacent manner of sheer over confidence that his Home Affairs Ministry is managed - which resulted in the escape of Mas Selamat Kastari ?
Surely, MSK escape is more damaging to Singapore's security and reputation than James Gomez accusation of inefficiency at the ELD ?
It was LKY's public statement that Singaporeans should learn from the Japanese ways in which the Leadership accepts accountability for the mishaps of their subordinates.
Unfortunately, his comments were intended for Singaporeans to follow, and not to be applied to himself or his own.
Has LKY never make a mistake in his life time that he wished he had never made ?
Surely his error of judgment in laughing at Chiam See Tong's O-Level Grade at a noon time Election Rally at Fullerton Square was one of a few such gaffs that he has made in his 50 odd years as a politician ?
Did he ever make a public apology to his insulting comments towards all the O-Level Singaporeans - insinuating that they cannot be compared to the talents similar to his breed of University educated genes ?
obviously this is PAP way of practising double standard.