James Gomez is still liar, dishonest MM Lee
-
Originally posted by Point_blank:
I did say you were a simpleton. As for 'throw it to the floor for judging', that wouldn't be necessary. You already had been judged since the day you joined here.This is coming from someone who challenged others
don't chicken out
Hypocrite, aren't you?
I do love seeing how you attempt flailingly to justify yourself not by reason and logic, but by insults. Do continue to show us your pathetic self
-
Originally posted by eagle:
This is coming from someone who challenged others
Hypocrite, aren't you?
I do love seeing how you attempt flailingly to justify yourself not by reason and logic, but by insults. Do continue to show us your pathetic self
Justify myself to the likes of you? lol! You think too highly of yourself, simpleton.
PS: How does it feel to be on the receiving ends of your 'flailing attempts not by reason and logic, but by insults to others? :-P
-
Originally posted by Point_blank:
That's all you can say? Expected i suppose, comming from you - all crap and no substance.
Perhaps you may want to consider changing your nick from Asswipe Atobe to something else, so you can continue to fool others? Or has it been done already?
What can anyone expect from your ability at understanding anything but 'Point_blank' logic ?
It is only in your own perverse way of understanding your own 'points' made in your own unique 'blank' form of the English Language that you will imagine carry any substance.
Yes, ''comming from you - all crap and no substance'' is typical 'Point_blank' juvenile ways of using the English Language.
The only fool that is hung up on my writing seems to be you, as you seem to be the only one who is returning for more swipes - after getting your ass butt kicked across each thread in this Speakers' Corner.
You are the only vain one that is intent on seeking recognition from the gallery, seeking others to judge our on-going debate, when you have nothing truly that of value - even nothing to point as to where my supposed lies exist, only general accusation and loud obscene expletives seems to be your only forte.
It is amazing that you dare take up the cudgel for your God Father, when you cannot even protect your own ass butt from getting constantly swiped.
-
Originally posted by Point_blank:
Justify myself to the likes of you? lol! You think too highly of yourself, simpleton.
PS: How does it feel to be on the receiving ends of your 'flailing attempts not by reason and logic, but by insults to others? :-P
Call me anything if you wish, that's your nature anyway. What else can be expected of a pathetic lifeform like you? You do realise that no one will mind being called anything by someone as juvenile as you.
How do I feel at the receiving end of your nonsense? Just like talking to a pathetic mad man who escaped from Woodbridge lor, those that no matter who they see, will just open their mouth to showcase the filthy worms crawling around inside. How could one ever expect reason and logic coming from a pathetic lunatic like you?
PS: How does it feel to be the joke of the forum, to be look down upon as a pathetic lifeform with totally no credibility by the majority in this forum?
-
roflcopter!
-
WP dared not tell James Gomez two forms incidents in
WP web site.What a shame.
2.Gomez shows off his name was the most search itme in 2006,
after he was exposed he lied that he had submitted the form.
What a shame.
3.Dunt frame up people.Next time u wont be so lucky.
So u see,a PhD candidiate in Opp Party cant find the right form, or
if filled out the correct one,cannot submit it properly.
dunt blame me i dunt have too much confidences in them.
Here are the sad history
http://www.jamesgomeznews.com/article.php?AID=1
In the 2001 general elections his (and his team mates’) nomination papers to contest the Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC) were declared void as the statutory declaration forms were deemed to be improperly filed. (In 2005, the government amended the Parliamentary Elections Act to do away with the need for a statutory declaration.)
In 2006, he stood as a candidate for the Workers' Party as part of a five member team in the Aljunied GRC. James Gomez became the face of the 2006 general elections when the ruling party tried to make political capital out of his application for a minority certificate.
As a result, during Singapore’s General Elections held in May 2006, “James Gomez” became the most searched name in Technorati an "authority on what's going on in the world of weblogs". The volume of reportage in the local and international media on James Gomez during the nine-days of campaigning raised James’s profile to an iconic level.
-
Originally posted by noisylion:
lionnoisy dared not tell sgforums cloning incidents in
sgforums web site.What a shame.
2.lionnoisy shows off his name was the most search itme in clonings in sgforums,
after he was exposed he lied that he was hacked and talk to himself thru makepeace.
What a shame.
3.Dunt create clones.u wont be so lucky.
So u see,a lionnoisy candidiate in sgforums cant make a good posts, or
if make a clone,cannot even hide it properly.
dunt blame me i dunt have too much confidences in him.
Here are the sad history:
Crimes Against the Forum
CLONING!
MAKEPEACE, MAKE CLONES?
A REPORT ON ATTEMPTED ASTROTURFING AND SOCKPUPPETING BY LIONNOISY
a lion puppet
For those who wondered what happened.
Lionnoisy created a clone called "makepeace" which he used in speakers corner to further his own agenda, trying to give people the impression that there are others out there that would agree with him.
Unfortunately he did a very poor job of hiding it.
This kind of behaviour is called sockpuppeting, ie. creating a false online identity to praise, defend or create the illusion of support for one’s self, allies or company.
A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an Internet community. In its earliest usage, a sockpuppet was a false identity through which a member of an Internet community speaks while pretending not to, like a puppeteer manipulating a hand puppet.[1]
In current usage, the perception of the term has been extended beyond second identities of people who already post in a forum to include other uses of misleading online identities. For example, a NY Times article claims that "sock-puppeting" is defined as "the act of creating a fake online identity to praise, defend or create the illusion of support for one’s self, allies or company."[2]
The key difference between a sockpuppet and a regular pseudonym (sometimes termed an "alt") is the pretense that the puppet is a third party who is not affiliated with the puppeteer.
To "flame wars" and "phishing" we can now add "sock puppet." A sock puppet, for those still boning up, is a false identity through which a member of an Internet community speaks while pretending not to, like a puppeteer manipulating a hand puppet. Recently, a senior editor at The New Republic got in trouble for some particularly colorful sock puppetry.
When Lee Siegel began blogging for The New Republic, he found, as many others have, that Internet posters tend to be fairly outspoken — and a good number of the posters on the blog were harshly critical. An exception was ''sprezzatura,'' who regularly offered extravagant praise. After Mr. Siegel was criticized for his writing about Jon Stewart, host of ''The Daily Show,'' sprezzatura wrote: ''Siegel is brave, brilliant and wittier than Stewart will ever be. Take that, you bunch of immature, abusive sheep.'' A reader charged that sprezzatura was in fact Mr. Siegel, but sprezzatura denied it.
The reader turned out to be right. ...
After making some lame and hasty excuse about his account being hacked, lionnoisy suddenly abandoned all this threads in which him being sockpuppeting was being mentioned. Unfortunately his excuse cannot stand up to logic as he was seen responding to and talking back TO HIS OWN ACCOUNT.
This is what happened:
29th April 0932hrs a "user" called "makepeace" that had never posted before created a lionnoisy-sounding titled thread called "Oz Judge ban TV drama & interview glorify gangland wars "
Already suspisions were raised because the structure and phrasing of the title was signature of lionnoisy. The first post by this "makepeace" was as such:
Originally posted by makepeace:
Oz Supreme Judge Justice Betty King
bans TV drama serices & interviews
glorifying those in the gangland war.The bans to prevent
jurors to be affected while the trial of a murder case is in progress.
U hardly expect democratic and free country like Oz will
ban TV programmes .Right?
U wont know TV programmes on Oz gangsters
are so hot there.Right?
u wont know ganglang wars there also so frequent.Right?
1.Judge cuts down(TV) Nine's Underbelly
Milanda Rout | February 12, 2008
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23200497-7582,00.html
2.Judge bans 'crime mums' interview
Peter Gregory | April 22, 2008
Barbara Williams and Judith Moran,
the mothers of defendant Evangelos Goussis
and the widow of the murdered Lewis Moran
respectively,were interviewed.
Its damn interesting that this news was under
Entertainment section!!
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/entertainment/judge-bans-underbelly-report/2008/04/21/1208742836107.html?s_cid=rss_news
3.The Morgan family----the story of the murdered
http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/moran.family.htm
4.The story of the Boss ,Carl Williams,behind the killing
http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/carl.williams.htm
5.u can learn more by seraching Justice Betty King
in www.yahoo.com.au
6.Questions
A.Why the media want to air the interview while the trial
is still on?
B.How are the gang activities in Down Under?
C.Am i look like anti--Oz?
D.How true are the postings in 3 and 4 listed above.
i dunt expect the there are so many details about
Oz gangsters.Can any one tell me more?
Note that other then for the user name, this post is virtually indistinguishable from the countless of other lionnoisy posts we can compare it with. The excessive reliance on the media, posting of hyperlinks, using warped logic that takes issues out of their context, and most tellingly the horrible english which make typos and grammatical errors right down to what lionnoisy would EXACTLY make is exactly what you'd expect from lionnoisy.
Hence lionnoisy must have been someone disappointed because after 20 minutes still nobody bothered to reply to his post under makepeace. Hence he decided to bump his own thread.
But after a few lackluster replies, he finally decided to "talk" to makepeace
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
3.The Morgan family----the story of the murdered
http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/moran.family.htm
4.The story of the Boss ,Carl Williams,behind the killing
http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/carl.williams.htm
I cant believe there are so many killings
in the above links !!!
More excited than Holloywood movies!!
Note the bad acting, where he pretended to be "excited" and "surprised" about what he wrote himself.
Now this is the funny part, if his account was really hacked as he claimed it to be, he would certainly not be replying back to his "hacked" account so happily in such a way.
But in any case when he was exposed he made this very funny, frantic and desperate post trying to suddenly divorce himself from the actions of his sockpuppetry by claiming he was hacked. Unfortunately all a basic look at the thread will reveal what really happened, and that is nothing other then lionnoisy was caught red-handed sockpuppeting.
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
Why did u check IP and English of forumers?
i just know my acct has been hijacked and u post it!!
It seems u are faster than me?Looks so strange!!
Looks like it is a cyber crime and /or frame up.
Hv anyone(u know who i mean) hacked into my e mails and computers ?
Do i have to hire armed guards to stay outside my
pigeon hole?
I am seeking helps from ISD,CIA,FBI,MI 5 and 6,
PRC Kong Ang, etc to check who hijack my acct
and make me appearing as ''makepeace'' after
i click submit.How safe in this forum??
I will buy you Ya Kun coffee if your info can lead to
catch the criminal,
Forums owners and mods are hereby notified my formal ,written and distressing complaints to cyber crimes!!
Another paethetic, and desperate reply from him when he was cornered:
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
oh it is good.Then can help me saving time to see counsellors How to get rid of computers addicts!!bye
Those who want to see what happened can go here:
http://sgforums.com/forums/10/topics/315326
And some screencaps, so the evidence is preserved:
"mysterous" makepeace appears:
and of course his own excited and poorly acted "reply" to his own clone.
and his own desperate and feeble attempts to wriggle out of the situtation:
http://www.jamesgomeznews.com/article.php?AID=1
) and parents, who were away on that dayÂ…Â….....when I first arrive,
nobody was there accept for my friendÂ….....then at about 10.30 in
the eveningÂ…......this tall, gorgeous looking girl walks inÂ…that
was the first time that I see his sister in person...Â….she was
stunning, wearing this worn out jeans and white T-shirt....Â…..she
was very friendly and sat down with us for about 15 mins before
going to her room to take her showerÂ…Â…Â….(her sister room is
actually linked to the common toilet that I have been using before
she came back)Â…Â…..and after about 20minsÂ…..Â….her sister open the
toilet doorÂ…..and I quickly make my way to the toilet cause I need
to pee badlyÂ…. 
Â…..it was
my friend sister's used panties and bra...she just remove a few
minutes agoÂ…and you can see that the stain on it is still
wet....(must have forgotten that I am in the house)Â…..when I see
thatÂ…....my heart start to pump in double quick timeÂ…and without
much thinking........my hands went straight down to reach for
itÂ…Â…..the panties that I was holding is white in color......and it
comes with some yellowish stain Â…...Â…while I am holding itÂ….....my
mind was trying to picture her supermodel face together with the
pantiesÂ…Â….man it was really mind blowÂ…...then I start to smell
itÂ…Â….. 
