Tharman says S’pore not headed for a recession
-
Originally posted by ☺☺:
This is Pekei first comment on this thread.
And this is Atobe response to his thread.
Anybody who have basic understanding of China-Singapore trade relationship will know that Atobe doesnt have a clue about the subject and that is the reason why he is asking questions instead of giving clear statements.The interesting part is, despite his short fall, there are still so many forumers who are queing up to back him up.
I think something must be wrong with this forum and I suspect this forum could be sponsored by SDP with intention to use this as a platform to spread anti government sentiment using lies and fabricated facts.
If it is true, I think they have done a really good job.
Are these the remaining creativity of a Gazelle lost for words for a new registered name to be used .?.. ☺☺:Has Gazelle finally decided to call it quits and appearing only with his eyeballs - or are these the remaining parts left hanging after being castrated ?We can all relax as there will be no more ''cock-talk'' from Gazelle -
Originally posted by Atobe:
For one who claim to be smarter than Gazelle, you certainly know how to react in the same manner as Gazelle when you cannot get things in the manner that you wished.
The question speaks for itself in being more polite at ridiculing your efforts that the Singapore-China trade ''is worth $27 Billion" both ways - it seems that you cannot discern the polite effort at questioning your position.
How did you brilliantly arrive at the magic figure of $27 Billion - was it in USD or SGD currencies, and from which year statistics was that number plucked from ? 1975 ?
Have you tried 'googling' if you cannot even pluck the right numbers from the fragrance that constantly hover around you ?
If you are capable - try digesting the following numbers from a report titled :
‘US-China Trade Statistics and China’s World Trade Statistics’
- and when you are done, shall we delve deeper into your ability at comprehending facts from your fantasy.
I am giving the immense ability of a Gazelle-Hunter the room to display his hunting prowessness, and see if he will shoot the Deer or the Gazelle.
Of course you did not mentioned any niche areas - that was my view of how your silly performance, and that statement was not putting words in your mouth, it is your Gazelle ways of reading nonsense into your sheep brain while pretending to be a Gazelle, and now think you are a remarkable DeerHunter.
Of course life will go on, as the Humanoid is far resillient that any four-legged animals - as has been proven by the evolution of Mankind.
Will you gamble that there will not be a global meltdown - if no one takes any action - when the US economy spiral downwards out-of-control ?
Are you so certain of this when you cannot even discern the difference sarcasm and cynicism ?
Gazelle, Gazelle , still playing to the attention of the larger audience, and hoping that they will rescue you from your untenable position.
Do I sound like I fear Gazelle ?
Come on Gazelle, surely your head has not swelled to the size that you believe you can float naturally under your own steam ?
The tone and quality of your responses has the hoof prints of the Gazelle, as much as you wish to distract others with the nick as a DeerHunter - is there any difference in the style and reasoning abilities between yourself and the Gazelle ?
Only a fool will register and defend a Gazelle's position with so much enthusiasm - for one who knows next to nothing about the issues being discussed, and will plunge headlong into an ongoing debate in the style of the Gazelle.
In any case, whether you are a Gazelle-Hunter or the Deer, we can always say good bye to old rubbish.
Originally posted by Atobe:Yes, that news was dated 21 April 2008 @ 5.40 GMT - 2 months old news.
Why do you sound so 'Gazelle' logical when you make no attempts with any clues to do so ?
Have you hit the nail on the head with your reasons for hoarding - that arises out of insecurity ?
Can we accept your explanation to give a deeper insight into the causes of MM LKY's insecurity for hoarding the Annual Surplus into the GIC funds, and managing it in a tight fisted manner that even the Elected President is not privy to its total size ?
If your observation is of any accuracy, then it confirms also the statements by another participant named ''robbertteh'' - that all the government expenditures on essential services are being recovered from Singaporeans' consumption and usage of such services, leading to a larger accumulated Government funds. This growth can only result from taking more money from the Citizens - and putting these out of circulation and into the Sovereign Wealth Funds managed by GIC and Temasek Holdings.
Can Singapore or Singaporeans be in a better position during a recession, when there is an influx of cheap labor to compete with the few jobs left for Singaporeans facing retrenchment during an economic storm ?
If the influx of cheap foreign labor is to meet the demands of the labor intensive industries, and create more jobs for Singaporeans - why will this government insist on placing a huge foreign worker's levy for every one employed, and making it even more difficult for the labor intensive manufacturers to stay in Singapore ?
Has it not been the plan of this Singapore Government to move out all the labor intensive industries to other lower labor cost centers, while we go up the value added chain in Bio-Science and Higher Technology ?
Are you outdated with your information besides believing Minister Tharman to have used outdated news information ?
The only Singaporeans that this Government has helped with the accrued interests and dividends are the Talented Elites in their close knit circle - by giving themselves and their own, the wage increases when every other Singaporean has been persuaded to tighten our belts and take a cut in wages and CPF savings.
The measly amounts that are given to each working person in each Singaporean household had dissipated the sum effect of such a large sum paid out.
The amounts given to each individual could not even last through one month of house hold expenses - and with more payment having to be topped up from our cash savings for the high charges of Government services.
Only a fool will give out all that he has saved, with none left for a rainiy day.
Only a politician will know how to dole out in small bits and pieces that make them relevant in holding the loyalties of those whom they see and treat as carpet beggars.
If the Elite and Talented Politicians have the clear altruistic interest of Singaporeans in their thoughts, they would have used the total sum - which they claimed to cost the Government a Billion SGD - paid out annually into a National Insurance Plan, with the Billion Dollar Gift as premium paid for all Singaporeans.
This would have been the best policy that takes care of all the health care and hospitalisation needs of every Singaporean - from cradle to grave.
Surely by 'Public' - you are not hoping to refer to the Government sector ?
It has always been the Private Sector that has taken the lead to organise the funds contributed by Singaporeans to be distributed to the needy Singaporeans.
The hard pressed Singaporeans have constantly and consistently been hit from every directions demanding for the meagre monies they earned as daily wages, or monthly salary to be given to charities.
Yet the large largesse managed by the Great Mentor remains inaccessible to help those who have been identified as ''really down and out through MCD, CDCs, NGO, etc....'' - as this Government fear that it will be depended upon infinitely as a crutch by the poor.
Ironically, the Talented Elite - who are already successful individuals - will need a crutch in the form of Million Dollar wages to keep them from being corrupted.
Quite a smart plagiarising efforts with a twist from the Police Force advertisement of 'Low Crime does not mean No Crime'.
Which School of Voodoo Economic did you graduate from ?
What economic philosophy are you driving with ?
Can there be progress with a lower or regressive ‘ Gross Domestic Product ’ ?
Have you read the report that “Recession Often Begin With Positive GDP Data” - with high inflation in tandem ?
Is Singapore not in this unique situation during this month of June 2008 - with food and fuel prices spiraling the percentages upwards even as the GDP data is positive although comparatively weaker ?
Should this not be the factor that caused Minister Tharman to sooth the nerves - as the writings are already on the Wall ?
For you to believe that ''inflation is up, but not to our eyeballs'' - you must either be deluded with your eyeballs at the height of a Gazelle, or that your DeerHunting results have been far better to cushion the high costs of living that is currently the bane of every Singaporean service provider and consumer.
Again, another useless comparison made by putting down our Asian neighbor, while our problems are far different from theirs.
Why will you not compare our living conditions with those of our Ministers' - who have liberally taken our monies to live their life of iron-bowl security, while calling for us to make sacrifices that they snatch away without a blink of an eyelid ?
No it is not all doom and gloom, as at least without the help of the Government - which has yet to reach many down and out Singaporeans, and which the help given to-date are meaningless - the Citizens of Singapore are more resourceful in handling ourselves, and bidding our time for judgment day.
So far the non-credible opportunists are those who are sly at making the plagiarised syncophantic sound from a single orthodox political philosophy - that is fearful of competing ideas which are developed from open minds.
How sure are you that Minister Tharman was referring to this piece of old news ?
Do you think that Singapore Ministers are so ill informed of global events in this age of instantaneous information, and will rely on out-dated information that will make their public speeches vulnerable to inaccuracies ?
Perhap, it is you - who is the ill informed one.
Have you read this piece that is freely available on the www - if only you will click on it, and this is one of quite a few similar assessments of the very dire state of the US economy if you have taken the trouble to make intelligent use of Google ?
‘The US Economic Recession – An Update : 4 June 2008’
Yes, money that goes around becomes the catalyst for economic activities - every economists know this principle.
Does this piece of information hit home with the Singapore Talented Elite that will lock-up a major portion of our money in unreachable CPF accounts that remain locked up till one either buy a house, reached the statutory age of withdrawal, or die ?
After the 1987 and 1997 economic downturn, the Economic Review Committee had on both occassions been given the feedback and recommendations that this Government should relax the CPF withdrawal rules, and more so during times when the workforce is facing economic hardship.
Unfortunately, this piece of Lee Ka Shing's anecdote never fall into the ears of the Singapore Talented Elite, who are perched too high on their pedestal towers.
The figures bandied around in US dollars, without adding in HK trade and just to give you a rough idea the scope of our bilateral trade amounts to you, of which you attempted to downplay by your inferences.
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/reference/mdsmay08.pdf
Rather than to depend on US or PRC sources, I would suggest our own national statistics board for more precise figures which will put you to further shame on your absolute ignorance, which now you changed your original inferences to make it seem like you were the one of a view that China trade is important to us, ( which i will have to take credit for knocking sense into your rotten head), further heaping scorn on me to brazen your way out.
I know your despicable modus operandi. I had been silently reading views here before i stepped in. Your way is to challenge viewpoints is by dissecting it into little parts in the hope of catching errors.But should you be caught instead, you change your tune and brazen it out by scorning that person. If he responds to your piecemeals, you will change tactic and continue to piecemeal his comments to wear him out or frustrate him with further scorn and not rational arguements.
When he leaves, you take credit for his comments and then declare victory, though i don't know what you had won except the spittle of those who knows better.
Thus, i will not embarass myself to be seen arguing with a fool, and an insidious one at that, a intellectual wannabe for you put shame to those who had studied and work hard to be where they are today.I had already attained my objectives - to prove you intellectually empty despite the use of technically correct words probably learnt from 'An idiot's guide to..' and filled with insidious misleading venom, as well as expressing my personal and original views on subjects matter of which silent readers can be kept informed or make their own judgement, for i stand by what i had posted.
You have yet to counter any of my arguments, which you even agree with the points, but your inflated ego will not allow it to be seen that way, thus the scorn. Pathetic creature you are.
The only ones who will support you are probably just as mentally deficient as you are, and for their sake, i hope they are not from the police force, because their silly methods of profiling a person will not help them make detective's grade, let alone make inspector.
So, crawl back into the rubbish bin where you really belong. Don't waste my time. -
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Dear Eagle,
This is the first time i am replying to you and hopefully the last time. Please do not attempt to tell me what I can or cannot do on my posts, so long as i write responsibily as responses to what i see fit, irregardless of first or last post, for you would be infringing on my freedom of expression,
Secondly, I thank you for criticising my post for its spelling errors, of which i can only claim that i am writing on a forum and not for a peer review dissection, and do not have the time to check for (edit:) spelling errors. Nevertheless, it is a spelling error on my part which i will endeavor to correct with time.
However, do not claim i am somebody else please, unless you have evidences that are irrefutable, otherwise you would only look like an a small child given a bunch of bananas instead of sweet juicy grapes.
This is the first time i am replying to you and hopefully the last time. Please do not attempt to tell me what I can or cannot do on my posts, so long as i write responsibily as responses to what i see fit, irregardless of first or last post, for you would be infringing on my freedom of expression,Didn't know telling you not to be rude is infringing on your freedom of expression.
Any reason for a new poster to tell me "hopefully the last time"?
-
Originally posted by £Îª€Ú°:
I noticed many people in this forum commonly misused the word "Sheeps", because the plural for Sheep should be Sheep (without) a S.
If whatever you said can be used as evidence, then I think there is also a strong possibility that many forummers here are actually the same person, as they have all misspell the same word and they have pretty much have the same opinion on the topics posted in this forum.
What do you think?
my apologies that i saw this late. i think you are alluding this to me, though it was a different nick
that pointed out that `mistake' to me on my `slip'.i have already clarified that it is a typo error which i admitted and corrected. now, can you pls pull out the different nicks that made the same `error' i made by calling sheep (in generally accepted definition here in singapore: MIW blind followers), `sheeps'? i would be curious to see how many different a/cs that i have set-up without me knowing, or impostors are there.
there is a clear distinction between a typo (sheeps) and bad english (irregardless), nicks aside. however, whichever nicks you used, it is an easy catch because of this `tell tale' error you consistently commit.
-
Originally posted by Civilgoh:
Channel NewsAsia - 1 hour 15 minutes ago
SINGAPORE : Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam on Sunday gave the assurance that Singapore is not heading for a recession.
Speaking at a community event, Mr Tharman said, "From all indications we have at this point, I don’t think we’re heading for a recession. But there will be discomfort on the ground. Unfortunately, the fuel price increase in Malaysia does mean that vegetable, poultry and some other prices will go up. We can’t avoid that. Fortunately, rice prices globally are coming down.
"But overall, we’re in a situation which isn’t temporary — this will be with us for a while. Commodity prices are much higher than what they used to be. But we’re tackling it, and we’re confident of tackling it — both through the government’s measures, the Growth Dividends, the GST Credits, as well as the way in which you see a lot of community initiatives on the ground."
Mr Tharman was speaking to reporters at the Entrepreneur—in—You Carnival at Republic Polytechnic, where some 7,000 people turned up to pick up tips on starting their own business.
The carnival included forums, workshops and an exhibition to nurture business acumen.
There were also winning business presentations by tertiary institutions, and a presentation of the 2008 Youth Enterprise Awards.
The People’s Association organised the event to encourage Singaporeans to be entrepreneurial. — CNA/ms
I'm not sure if i could believe them this time for they were so way off the mark in last year budget forecast. They said it would be a deficit budget and they had to up the GST to generate money to help the needy but in the end it was a big fat surplus..... -
Tharman very brave ... when Bernake already say that US recession more unlikely.
Would the US Fed Chairman cock up like Singkee ministers?
-
Originally posted by pearlie27:
I'm not sure if i could believe them this time for they were so way off the mark in last year budget forecast. They said it would be a deficit budget and they had to up the GST to generate money to help the needy but in the end it was a big fat surplus.....
Take whatever PAP says as a pinch of salt, not necessary to believe 100%. The "kind" lee hsien loong mentioned that increase 2% in GST is to help the poor, so what happen as there is no news about this. -
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
The figures bandied around in US dollars, without adding in HK trade and just to give you a rough idea the scope of our bilateral trade amounts to you, of which you attempted to downplay by your inferences.
http://www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/reference/mdsmay08.pdf
Rather than to depend on US or PRC sources, I would suggest our own national statistics board for more precise figures which will put you to further shame on your absolute ignorance, which now you changed your original inferences to make it seem like you were the one of a view that China trade is important to us, ( which i will have to take credit for knocking sense into your rotten head), further heaping scorn on me to brazen your way out.
Even if your 'singstat.gov' is to be entertained - how have you brilliantly arrive at your statement that "our trade with China is worth $27 Billion both ways" - presumably in US Currency ?
How should we interprete your "both ways" to arrive at your value of $27 Billion ?
From your diligent effort at digging up the 'singstat.gov' - the "Exports By Major Region / Country" for 2007 showed the Total Value at $43,549.5 Million.
The "Imports By Major Region / Country" for the same Year 2007, the Total Value was at $48,013.4 Million.
Where did you pluck your facts to conclude that our trade with China is worth $27 Billion ?
Incidentally, did you appreciate that China has a Trade Surplus of $4,463.9 Million over Singapore ?
{BTW - the above was taken from External Trade section of your 'singstat.gov' in Adobe PDF Page 54 of 118, or Page 40 of the Report.}
I know your despicable modus operandi. I had been silently reading views here before i stepped in. Your way is to challenge viewpoints is by dissecting it into little parts in the hope of catching errors.
But should you be caught instead, you change your tune and brazen it out by scorning that person. If he responds to your piecemeals, you will change tactic and continue to piecemeal his comments to wear him out or frustrate him with further scorn and not rational arguements.
When he leaves, you take credit for his comments and then declare victory, though i don't know what you had won except the spittle of those who knows better.
Thus, i will not embarass myself to be seen arguing with a fool, and an insidious one at that, a intellectual wannabe for you put shame to those who had studied and work hard to be where they are today.
I had already attained my objectives - to prove you intellectually empty despite the use of technically correct words probably learnt from 'An idiot's guide to..' and filled with insidious misleading venom, as well as expressing my personal and original views on subjects matter of which silent readers can be kept informed or make their own judgement, for i stand by what i had posted.
Is this not pathetic that you have to go through such length to explain your position, and yet despite stating that - "I will not embarass myself to be seen arguing with a fool" - you will put forth your case with so much diligence in continuing with the 'argument', can only produce flimsy points that you depend as 'your kind of Facts' ?
Did you fine tune your scope before you claim to be a 'DeerHunter' ?
Try Gazelle hunting with the infamous wanking tool that need no sharp-shooting skills, as he will be floored just getting a sniff from the slop.
You are a sorry sight to behold if you have studied all my moves, and still will allow yourself to be diced and spliced.
You have yet to counter any of my arguments, which you even agree with the points, but your inflated ego will not allow it to be seen that way, thus the scorn. Pathetic creature you are.
The only ones who will support you are probably just as mentally deficient as you are, and for their sake, i hope they are not from the police force, because their silly methods of profiling a person will not help them make detective's grade, let alone make inspector.
So, crawl back into the rubbish bin where you really belong. Don't waste my time.With your ability in discerning between sarcasm and cynicism, you surely can make the grade at being an Assistant to Minister Tharman, and help him boost the ''$27 Billion both ways'' trade between China and Singapore.
Why will you insult the Singapore Police in our discussion ?
How did they get into the picture ? Did they reject your 'DeerHunter' license as there is no reason for you to have one in Singapore ? Or was it the wanking gun that you have that the Singapore Police find objections wtih ?
If you have spent your time reading up to this part, will you waste your time further to satisfy your itch to rebutt ?
If you must rebutt - please make some effort to avoid getting swiped again.
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Even if your 'singstat.gov' is to be entertained - how have you brilliantly arrive at your statement that "our trade with China is worth $27 Billion both ways" - presumably in US Currency ?
How should we interprete your "both ways" to arrive at your value of $27 Billion ?
From your diligent effort at digging up the 'singstat.gov' - the "Exports By Major Region / Country" for 2007 showed the Total Value at $43,549.5 Million.
The "Imports By Major Region / Country" for the same Year 2007, the Total Value was at $48,013.4 Million.
Where did you pluck your facts to conclude that our trade with China is worth $27 Billion ?
Incidentally, did you appreciate that China has a Trade Surplus of $4,463.9 Million over Singapore ?
{BTW - the above was taken from External Trade section of your 'singstat.gov' in Adobe PDF Page 54 of 118, or Page 40 of the Report.}
Is this not pathetic that you have to go through such length to explain your position, and yet despite stating that - "I will not embarass myself to be seen arguing with a fool" - you will put forth your case with so much diligence in continuing with the 'argument', can only produce flimsy points that you depend as 'your kind of Facts' ?
Did you fine tune your scope before you claim to be a 'DeerHunter' ?
Try Gazelle hunting with the infamous wanking tool that need no sharp-shooting skills, as he will be floored just getting a sniff from the slop.
You are a sorry sight to behold if you have studied all my moves, and still will allow yourself to be diced and spliced.
With your ability in discerning between sarcasm and cynicism, you surely can make the grade at being an Assistant to Minister Tharman, and help him boost the ''$27 Billion both ways'' trade between China and Singapore.
Why will you insult the Singapore Police in our discussion ?
How did they get into the picture ? Did they reject your 'DeerHunter' license as there is no reason for you to have one in Singapore ? Or was it the wanking gun that you have that the Singapore Police find objections wtih ?
If you have spent your time reading up to this part, will you waste your time further to satisfy your itch to rebutt ?
If you must rebutt - please make some effort to avoid getting swiped again.
Shoo! Crawl back to your rubbish bin where you belong. -
Hmm DeerHunter, another "suddenly appearing" account in recent months.
Astroturfing anyone?
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Shoo! Crawl back to your rubbish bin where you belong.
But should you be caught instead, you change your tune and brazen it out by scorning that person -
You think Government want to tell the citizens that there's a recession meh?
This will obviously spoil their aim of Singapore being a "perfect" city
In short,never believe the propanganda.
-
Deerhunter, are you hunting for this deer?
This undated photo provided by the Center of Natural Sciences in Prato, Italy, Wednesday, June 11, 2008, shows a deer with a single horn in the center of its head. The one-year-old Roe Deer - nicknamed "Unicorn'' - was born in captivity in the research center's park in the Tuscan town of Prato, near Florence, Gilberto Tozzi, director of the Center of Natural Sciences, said. He is believed to have been born with a genetic flaw; his twin has two horns. -
Originally posted by ceecookie:
You think Government want to tell the citizens that there's a recession meh?
This will obviously spoil their aim of Singapore being a "perfect" city
In short,never believe the propanganda.
Absurd. Of course they will tell. Will tell you that your employer CPF contribution will be cut, ask you spend less and no wage rise etc..all for the sake of keeping your job.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Shoo! Crawl back to your rubbish bin where you belong.Has the DeerHunter lost patience waiting for the Gazelle to appear, and decide to hang-up the gun ?
Surely I did not disturb your hunt and scared the Gazelle from your sight - as the sound in my tune remained the same ?
You do not have to leave the hunting ground, simply to allow me to claim victory in your absence - as you claimed in your observations of my style.
Or have you exhausted your intellectual capacity in explaining your brilliant $27 Billion in the value of the China-Singapore Trade - "both ways" ?
Good thing that you are faking your own advise, and do retire to Sesame Street where the garbage bin tenant will surely welcome your company.
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Has the DeerHunter lost patience waiting for the Gazelle to appear, and decide to hang-up the gun ?
Surely I did not disturb your hunt and scared the Gazelle from your sight - as the sound in my tune remained the same ?
You do not have to leave the hunting ground, simply to allow me to claim victory in your absence - as you claimed in your observations of my style.
Or have you exhausted your intellectual capacity in explaining your brilliant $27 Billion in the value of the China-Singapore Trade - "both ways" ?
Good thing that you are faking your own advise, and do retire to Sesame Street where the garbage bin tenant will surely welcome your company.
Victory? What's your prize for many of the economic rubbish you attempt to throw before everyone face here? Oh..yes, the rubbish bin. Crawl back and revel in your $27.00 ( S$40.00, '07 rate) rubbish bin. Enjoy your self proclaimed 'victory'. Your only victory is in furthering your own stupidity.
-
Recession? Feedback from sales staff that unlike before this year they see fewer people shopping during GSS.
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Victory? What's your prize for many of the economic rubbish you attempt to throw before everyone face here? Oh..yes, the rubbish bin. Crawl back and revel in your $27.00 ( S$40.00, '07 rate) rubbish bin. Enjoy your self proclaimed 'victory'. Your only victory is in furthering your own stupidity.
Hello Clone, Have you given up on your $27 Billion Trade between China-Singapore - BOTH WAYS - and now proposing to bunk it into a $27 garbage bin ?Surely Sesame Street need not pay for such an expensive bin even for a budget kids' show that you seem to have got your ideas from ?
How would you know that one need to crawl into a bin ?
Must be a practised habit each time you get yourself debunked for your poorly gathered facts ?
Must you ask - ''What's the prize for many of the economic rubbish you attempt to throw before everyone face here ?''
It depends which economic rubbish you have offered that require me to debunk and throw away into your $27 rubbish bin before everyone's face that you choose as your audience.
The biggest prize will be to see a pompous over-confident DeerHunter shooting his own Gazelle butt - after blindly charging to support a losing proposition that he continue on-behalf of his master clone : the Gazelle.
You did say that you have been observing my style of claiming victory when others have left the argument - how did you come to such a definite conclusion ? Was it inferred or were you deluded in seeing firewords placed in those threads to celebrate the victory that you have awarded to my arguments observed by you ?
Have you not been a consistent debater that have persistently lost your arguments based on your own juvenile mistakes made, and blaming others for the silly and helpless argumentative position that you chose that was never winnable - as in your claim for the $27 Billion China-Singapore Trade.
Go back to Sesame Street and be the Green Monster in the garbage bin - you will have more fun entertaining the kids than succeeding to be a DeerHunter in SGP.
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Hello Clone, Have you given up on your $27 Billion Trade between China-Singapore - BOTH WAYS - and now proposing to bunk it into a $27 garbage bin ?Surely Sesame Street need not pay for such an expensive bin even for a budget kids' show that you seem to have got your ideas from ?
How would you know that one need to crawl into a bin ?
Must be a practised habit each time you get yourself debunked for your poorly gathered facts ?
Must you ask - ''What's the prize for many of the economic rubbish you attempt to throw before everyone face here ?''
It depends which economic rubbish you have offered that require me to debunk and throw away into your $27 rubbish bin before everyone's face that you choose as your audience.
The biggest prize will be to see a pompous over-confident DeerHunter shooting his own Gazelle butt - after blindly charging to support a losing proposition that he continue on-behalf of his master clone : the Gazelle.
You did say that you have been observing my style of claiming victory when others have left the argument - how did you come to such a definite conclusion ? Was it inferred or were you deluded in seeing firewords placed in those threads to celebrate the victory that you have awarded to my arguments observed by you ?
Have you not been a consistent debater that have persistently lost your arguments based on your own juvenile mistakes made, and blaming others for the silly and helpless argumentative position that you chose that was never winnable - as in your claim for the $27 Billion China-Singapore Trade.
Go back to Sesame Street and be the Green Monster in the garbage bin - you will have more fun entertaining the kids than succeeding to be a DeerHunter in SGP.
I guess your rubbish bin can be pretty lonely. Go on and spout, but just crawl back into the only place where you belong once you finished.
-
Who is this joker Deerhunter? Newly registered poster and talk so much rubbish with the main intention of starting a flame war.
-
Originally posted by Pin Head:
Who is this joker Deerhunter?
Newly registered poster and talk so much rubbish with the main intention of starting a flame war.He is not new. He is using new nick. He is gazelle, Aelop, Point_blank.
-
Actually I think gazelle is kinda sad now, he must be really frazzled trying to switch inbetween multiple accounts thinking it actually makes it look like he has more support then he has, but unfortuntately it's fooling nobody.
The funnier part is that he even tries to speak out in support of himself, but only manages to
To paraphrase a fictional persona, "his only victory is in furthering his own stupidity.
ROLFCOPTER
-
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
I guess your rubbish bin can be pretty lonely. Go on and spout, but just crawl back into the only place where you belong once you finished.
Do you need to guess if it is lonely, when you are the permanent inhabitant with a puppet Green Monster for company ?Is this where you learn to take on different Point_blank characters - in Gazelle, Aelop, Pekei and how many more - when you need to find solace after being repeatedly being trounced from one thread to another ?
I am enjoying a wonderful weekend by the sea, while all you can do is to sulk and shoo others from your $27 garbage bin that is stuffed with your "$27 Billion China-Singapore Trade - BOTH WAYS".
-
Originally posted by Atobe:
Do you need to guess if it is lonely, when you are the permanent inhabitant with a puppet Green Monster for company ?Is this where you learn to take on different Point_blank characters - in Gazelle, Aelop, Pekei and how many more - when you need to find solace after being repeatedly being trounced from one thread to another ?
I am enjoying a wonderful weekend by the sea, while all you can do is to sulk and shoo others from your $27 garbage bin that is stuffed with your "$27 Billion China-Singapore Trade - BOTH WAYS".
Shoo! Crawl back to your rubbish bin, even if it is near the sea as you claim. And continue to remind everyone of the estimated $27 billion trade, in US dollars, the currency of international commerce. It only shows your utter ignorance on the international trade. -
Originally posted by DeerHunter:
Shoo! Crawl back to your rubbish bin, even if it is near the sea as you claim. And continue to remind everyone of the estimated $27 billion trade, in US dollars, the currency of international commerce. It only shows your utter ignorance on the international trade.
No use trying to shoo the attention that you have been seeking to your DeerHunting abilities - you have already made your 'point blank' fame with all your 'blank point' shots.To save you the trouble in jumping to both threads in which you have suddenly decide to display a flash of ingenuine genuis with you US$ reason - you sound alot more credible with your continued effort in giving me a blind eye in not reading what I have written.
Have you also decided to identify the $27 Billion trade between China-Singapore in US Dollars ?
If we were to believe your numbers from your given 'singstat.gov' - Singapore Export to China was S$43,549.5 Million; while Singapore's Import from China was S$48.013.4 Million - and taking an exchange rate of USD1.00 to SGD 1.48 as at end-2007 : both numbers hardly come any where near your US$27 Billion.
What exchange rate were you using in making your estimate to conclude that the China-Singapore Trade - BOTH WAYS had amounted to US$27 Billion ?
Do you need the Hubble Telescope to improve your DeerHunting skills ?
It is Sunday, and Hubble is probably available for your efforts to redeem your credibility by looking for some new stars to add dazzle to your sudden brilliance.