Democracy Index
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Could be too. Either they were brainwashed or they chose P4P.P4P's governance is taking alot and giving little back, therefore the retiring folks find it hard to make ends meet in their old age, they need to work.
i think they vote for p4p is they rather choose sth not so good ,better than sth unknown, -
Originally posted by kramnave:
We can't have referendums all the time, thus the most logical step is to vote for a government to act on our behalf, whether or not that destabilizes the whole country as a worst case scenario every 4 years or so is another issue as we chose it etc. The only gripe now is that many belief that the voting system in Singapore is unfair and the result may not be a true reflection of what would be the actual outcome should we have a free press and without GRCs etc...
The gist of it all is that many believe is that the system is unfair.
but the problem is P4p is so majority, and they "surpress" the opposition party, when the opposition party make some gathering to promot their idea, P4P will depoly force to clear them, so when ppl don't have any chance to get to know the opposition party, how does this FAIR election could happen, -
I think lionnoisy made a valid point last time in another thread:
"Does these type of indexes matter???"
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
If I'm paid millions by the tax payers, I don't need welfare. I can fly to Switzerland to have regular blood transfusion to keep my body in tip-top condition even into my 80s.
Shit, another idiot believes that LKY goes for regular blood transfusion...
-
Originally posted by rokkie:
but the problem is P4p is so majority, and they "surpress" the opposition party, when the opposition party make some gathering to promot their idea, P4P will depoly force to clear them, so when ppl don't have any chance to get to know the opposition party, how does this FAIR election could happen,Promote ideas can have many ways. Open houses, website etc. ARE THEY PROMOTING IDEAS ?! IF THEY ARE HOW MANY KNOW ABOUT THEM ?!
Its not the government, it is not the opposition...may or may not actually. MOST IMPORTANT IS THE PEOPLE.
We have one party...a group of activists actually who do not care about votes. That is why they get raped at every election..other than the period when CST was at helm. Then you have people supporting them.
On the other hand, you have people through their support of these activists ignoring a party that holds Hougang, almost won Aljunied and took a big chunk of votes in Ang Mo Kio...Just because a group of activists who do not care about votes started questioning them !!
How do you want to erode the ruling party's power then ?
-
Originally posted by kramnave:
Shit, another idiot believes that LKY goes for regular blood transfusion...
But how do you know ? -
Originally posted by Gutentaginator:
But how do you know ?You go for regular blood transfusions, you come back alive i pay for you...if you are at his age that is
-
Originally posted by kramnave:
You go for regular blood transfusions, you come back alive i pay for you...if you are at his age that is
Any proof to substantiate your statement?Elderly patients do receive blood transfusion.
Results Patients with lower hematocrit values on admission had higher 30-day mortality rates. Blood transfusion was associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality among patients whose hematocrit on admission fell into the categories ranging from 5.0 to 24.0 percent (adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.45) to 30.1 to 33.0 percent (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.89). It was not associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality among those whose hematocrit values fell in the higher ranges. In one of seven subgroup analyses (among patients who survived at least two days), transfusion was not associated with a reduction in mortality for patients with hematocrit values of 30.1 percent or higher.
-
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Any proof to substantiate your statement?Elderly patients do receive blood transfusion.
Results Patients with lower hematocrit values on admission had higher 30-day mortality rates. Blood transfusion was associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality among patients whose hematocrit on admission fell into the categories ranging from 5.0 to 24.0 percent (adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.45) to 30.1 to 33.0 percent (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.89). It was not associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality among those whose hematocrit values fell in the higher ranges. In one of seven subgroup analyses (among patients who survived at least two days), transfusion was not associated with a reduction in mortality for patients with hematocrit values of 30.1 percent or higher.
No proof..My statement was if he is of his age and goes for regular blood transfusion, c omes back alive, I pay for him.
-
Originally posted by kramnave:
No proof..My statement was if he is of his age and goes for regular blood transfusion, c omes back alive, I pay for him.
Even if he does, he won't let anyone has any evidence that he has gone for it. Anyway, whether he goes for it or not is not of much importance. What is important is he and his party must put serving the public as their top priority.